[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
There were 7 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes, with no other votes received. The vote has passed. I will re-tag the 0.10-rc3 tag in the repo as 0.10 proper, add the release files to the dist release svn repo, and release the maven staging repo. The website will be updated later after the artifac

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem): PROTON-979: [1] It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global state. If SASL gets to initialise libcrypto first then when the SSL code tries to do it it fails. Just another emphasis that neither openssl nor Cyr

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I vote +1: I've tested proton-c & python on: Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64) Ubuntu 14.04 (amd64/i686) Raspberry Pi2 (Raspbian Jesse) FreeBSD 10.1p17 Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 12 (2013) [Some of these test have had Java & tox as well but it's been uneven) And modulo some (severe) irritations (see the

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Great, well done figuring it out! Care to vote yet? :) Robbie On 13 August 2015 at 21:16, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem): > > PROTON-979: [1] > > It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global > state. If SASL gets to

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Ted Ross
On 08/13/2015 03:20 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: To clarify, my run was also using the x86_64 / amd64 version, using a VM. Neither of us have been able to reproduce what Andrew saw, so unless we can get a better idea what it is specifically then I am inclined to say that we proceed. If there is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
To clarify, my run was also using the x86_64 / amd64 version, using a VM. Neither of us have been able to reproduce what Andrew saw, so unless we can get a better idea what it is specifically then I am inclined to say that we proceed. If there is an issue and it can be identified, I'm sure it will

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Ted Ross
I ran the tests under Ubuntu 14.04 (for amd64) running an x86_64 Linux kernel (using Docker). All of the tests, including the SSL tests pass. -Ted On 08/13/2015 09:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues (once I figured out what packages

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues (once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing? Robbie On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu12

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Andrew Stitcher
I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17 Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine. This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works. Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL - investigating whether this is my config or something more.

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Cliff Jansen
+1... a smaller set of Windows tests than Chuck's, but looks good to me On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. > > Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Timothy Bish
On 08/11/2015 04:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. > > Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. > > The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: > https://dist.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Robbie Gemmell
+1 I performed some of my earlier testing of RC2 using Qpid C++ 0.34, ActiveMQ 5.12, and Qpid JMS master. I also verified that I was now able to connect to qpidd using DIGEST-MD5 following the fix for PROTON-975. Robbie On 11 August 2015 at 21:08, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have put

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
+1 I tested the python bindings. Built the buindings through cmake and ran tests. I also ran tox and tested the pip install process. It seems to work as expected. Thanks On 11/08/15 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordin

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Chuck Rolke
:08:01 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3) > > Hi all, > > I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. > > Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. > > The release archive and sig/checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Ted Ross
+1 I tested proton-c against Dispatch Router. It all looks good. -Ted On 08/11/2015 04:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archi

[VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)

2015-08-11 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts fo