+1 to nuking proton@ from orbit.
- Original Message -
> From: "Fraser Adams"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 2:52:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Does anyone read this list?
>
> +1 on Alan's comments
>
> Qpid has lots of compon
+1 on Alan's comments
Qpid has lots of components and a single cohesive user list as the
"entry point" is the best way to foster community IMHO.
F.
On 24/03/16 21:29, Alan Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:23 +, Troy Daniels wrote:
This was also the only mailing list that I found a
I support making that change. It's now on my site update todo list.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:23 +, Troy Daniels wrote:
> > This was also the only mailing list that I found a reference to when
> > I was
> > looking at the proton site. Wh
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:23 +, Troy Daniels wrote:
> This was also the only mailing list that I found a reference to when
> I was
> looking at the proton site. Which makes me agree that you (or at
> least
> the documentation) are trying to recruit developers rather than
> users. :-)
It is a h
This was also the only mailing list that I found a reference to when I was
looking at the proton site. Which makes me agree that you (or at least
the documentation) are trying to recruit developers rather than users. :-)
Troy
On 3/24/16, 2:12 PM, "Michael Goulish" wrote:
>
>I do think this lis
I do think this list is meant to be mostly about the
mechanical details of development, and any topics
that would be of interest to actual users is meant to
go on the users list.
The fact that there is no documentation that might
have told you this is actually intentional. It's to
help get you
Troy,
I monitor both this discussion (proton) list and the users.
It is true there is more going on in the users discussion list. I tend to post
to the users list because a lot of times discussion items posted here (proton)
are just not picked here as readily as on users.
I agree with your ge