Hi,
Sorry if this isn't the right place to discuss sprockets.
If I want to list dependent files in order, but not concatenate them, is that
possible with command line sprocketize?
This is so I can set up a project to allow concatenated or non-concatenated js
to be used, but still use the
On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:08:53 Andrew Dupont wrote:
Weighing in again, decades after starting the thread.
First, I'm fine with calling it Function.IDENTITY instead of Function.K.
On Sep 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
Make sense. Shouldn't that be Function.empty and
n Wednesday 07 October 2009 16:02:28 kangax wrote:
On Oct 7, 9:16 am, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:52:56 Jim Higson wrote:
Forked an untested implementation:
http://gist.github.com/204008
Ah, just had a better idea and edited again. Does
In another thread I wrote:
The biggest problem with events at the moment is only Elements can fire
them. This makes MVC difficult because the Model (javascript objects) not
the view (HTML elements) would ideally fire the events.
For Prototype2, maybe there should be an observable mixin.
it into account.
Best,
Tobie
On Oct 7, 9:50 am, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
In another thread I wrote:
The biggest problem with events at the moment is only Elements can
fire them. This makes MVC difficult because the Model (javascript
objects) not the view (HTML elements
Forked an untested implementation:
http://gist.github.com/204008
Jim
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:41:28 Jim Higson wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 12:34:50 Allen Madsen wrote:
Jim,
Check this modification of Tobie's code out.
http://gist.github.com/203978
The problem you're
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:52:56 Jim Higson wrote:
Forked an untested implementation:
http://gist.github.com/204008
Ah, just had a better idea and edited again. Does the same but without adding
new Elements to the document and without requiring observable object instances
to have any
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 08:09:21 Tobie Langel wrote:
Finally, Sam is working on a new API for event delegation in 1.7 /
2.0. If changes are to be made, they should be discussed once he's
posted his initial implementation.
If I could suggest...
The biggest problem with events at the moment
On Thursday 01 October 2009 21:56:30 Mike Rumble wrote:
You could also encapsulate this in a function wrapping Element#remove,
which IMHO is something Prototype should do out of the box.
Quite disagree:
* If I remove an element and add it elsewhere, I don't expect its events to
have been
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 06:49:15 Joran Greef wrote:
Prototype's existing String.empty and Array.empty interfaces would
imply that Function.empty return a boolean indicating perhaps that the
function is empty.
Well, it *could* do:
Function.empty = function(){};
Function.empty.empty =
On Saturday 26 September 2009 04:04:22 kangax wrote:
On Sep 24, 11:20 pm, Andrew Dupont goo...@andrewdupont.net wrote:
Unless anyone has serious objections, or has a better idea, I'm going
to add these as aliases of `Prototype.emptyFunction` and
`Prototype.K`, respectively. They belong
On Friday 25 September 2009 04:20:06 Andrew Dupont wrote:
Unless anyone has serious objections, or has a better idea, I'm going
to add these as aliases of `Prototype.emptyFunction` and
`Prototype.K`, respectively. They belong better there, since in theory
the `Prototype` namespace is for
On Friday 25 September 2009 13:08:57 Rick Waldron wrote:
On the subject of end developer confusion, I'd like to make a suggestion
regarding the naming...
Function.emptyFn
Function.returnFn
Because they say exactly what they are. This is how I've named (almost...
$.function.emptyFn() and
A bit like the parameter to Element#up, the selector would define where to
stop. Eg:
html
body
div class=content
p
blah
span id=interesting-content
not really so interesting
/span
/p
/div
/body
/html
$('interesting-content').ancestors('div#content')
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 16:18:20 T.J. Crowder wrote:
@Jim,
Ie, Class.create takes any number of objects of functions or functions.
If functions, the function name is used.
I see where you're coming from, but FWIW I'm with Allen on this one.
Also, there's no standard way to get the
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 09:02:28 Jim Higson wrote:
I see where you're coming from, but FWIW I'm with Allen on this one.
Also, there's no standard way to get the name of a function until
ECMAScript5 (which standardizes the truly outrageous idea that
function instances should have
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 03:57:13 Allen Madsen wrote:
TJ,
I guess I don't understand why it wouldn't work. I'll illustrate how I
understand it and you correct me where I'm wrong.
var A = Class.create({
nifty: function(){}
});
var B = Class.create(A, {
nifty: function(){
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 13:56:14 Joran wrote:
Dear Tobie
Thank you for your reply. Could I suggest a few more questions?
1. Does EcmaScript 5 preclude one from modifying
Object.prototype.toString?
2. Over-writing Object.prototype.toString does not at first glance
appear to cause it
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:27:49 Allen Madsen wrote:
Jim,
I like your suggestion, except that there would be no way to create private
variables and functions that could be used in more than one function. For
example, with my suggested method I could do:
I suppose if you wanted both you
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 14:56:06 Allen Madsen wrote:
Hey TJ,
For your two suggested additions. I don't think I have ever had a use for
either. One thing I would like to suggest though is that Class.create take
an object or a function as an argument. Since it is essentially a
requirement
On Friday 04 September 2009 14:09:32 T.J. Crowder wrote:
[...] I do _not_ mean that I
think callSuper is a great name; I don't and I expect suggestions
like yours to result in a better name. But something unlikely to
clash makes it simpler for people to do a global search-and-replace to
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 17:41:11 YaoXing Zhang wrote:
Diodeus,
Maybe you would like to try YUI Compressor which will reduce the size even
more. I'm using prototype 1.6.2 and after compressing it becomes from 127Kb
to 74Kb.
And then you can gzip it... reduces by (IIRC) 50%-ish again.
I
22 matches
Mail list logo
