hi i’m wondering if any part of transfuser is accessible to us
i heard a sample of it on youtube and liked it
i do remixing
also can we access preset kits in strike
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro
Tools Accessibility group.
To
Hi Slau,
In a previous message in this thread, you mentioned that the AAX plugs
were some what accessible in 10.3.8. I had an instance last night
working on someones rig that was running this build, and I just pulled
up the 7 band EQ that is standard kit in Pro Tools. When navigating
the plug,
Poppa, As far as I'm able to tell, the only way to solo safe a track
is to physically click the solo button in track strip while holding
down command. In other words, when I'm on the solo button, I press
voiceover command f5 to bring mouse focus to the button, and while
holding down command, click
Think hiding all tracks would clear solo, although probably a last resort.
Isn't there a modifier that inverts selection too? That'd get the
workflow down to a couple of clicks. I'm not in front of PT to find
it, anyone know what I'm on about?
Scott
On 1/10/14, matt diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com
I've never gotten the download manager to work for me. I always just click the
link and it works just fine as a normal download in Safari.
Slau
On Jan 9, 2014, at 10:17 PM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried it but error I needed JAVA installed which I do.
I clicked hear to
Hi Gabe,
Well, I think just about everybody here has been indignant at being perceived
as not being able to perform a particular task or get something done as a blind
person. Who here hasn't experienced that frustration? Sometimes it's just not
worth needing to prove oneself. I don't solder
Hi Jason,
I think the easiest way to do this is to bring up the Item Chooser list, type s
o l o to narrow down the list to only solo buttons and simply arrow down
through them. The button that is soloed will stand out in the list as being
engaged.
Hope that helps,
Slau
On Jan 10, 2014, at
Hi Matt,
It is a bit odd that none of the parameters are visible in that particular
plug-in under 10. I wouldn't have guessed at that result. Well, for now, I
suppose one could use the 4-band eQ which appears to be readable. Of course,
under version 11.1, the 7-band EQ is completely readable.
I will try that Matt. For safe solo, it would make mixing much easier when I
get a high track count of instruments that I want to bus and have to rename
each instrument track by track because the client baught that music and it
is just labeled with the producers name rather than the instrument
I was recently put in touch with the president and vice-president at PACE
anti-Piracy, the makers of the iLok key and the iLok License Manager software.
Since i made it clear that I wished to share their response with this
community, I'm pasting it below. In fact, I'm including my original
Here is an artical I read last night after hearing an ingineer talk about using
multable master busses inbetween tracks and aax busses to be able to gain more
head room in the mix and control source signals better.
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun10/articles/pt_0610.htm
--
You received
Thank you Slau, I shared this with the mag as well because so many of the users
over there struggle with the same issue.
- Original Message -
From: Slau Halatyn
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:04 AM
Subject: PACE Anti-Piracy's response
This discussion is a good illustration of why control surfaces are practically
a necessity. Many have dedicated solo clear buttons not to mention the solo
buttons themselves which can quickly be turned on or off. Anyway, always good
to know multiple ways of getting to the same result. Too bad
I just wanted to point out that this article, like so many found items on the
Internet, is a bit long in the tooth. Pro Tools has since moved to a 64-bit
architecture. Of course, the salient point that one can simply turn down a
master fader to decrease the bus output still applies. That said,
Perhaps also mention that this affects Windows
users as well, and that NVDA is a free
screenreader they can use in their testing on the Windows side.
At 03:16 PM 1/10/2014, you wrote:
Thank you Slau, I shared this with the mag as
well because so many of the users over there struggle with the
I understand your posission and you make a valid point, for me I am still on PT
8 and I have found that quite a few people don't know concepts like this within
PT and I hear so many mixes that are pumping extremely hard, for more than one
reason of corse, but by just considering a step like
Oh, depending on what version of QT they've used, there hands really
could be tied quite tight. That said, I'm pretty sure the iZotope
chaps managed to get some semblance of accessibility going pre QT5, so
it can be done.
Good to know it's on the radar anyway. Thanks for keeping us informed.
Yes, true :)
On Jan 10, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand your posission and you make a valid point, for me I am still on
PT 8 and I have found that quite a few people don't know concepts like this
within PT and I hear so many mixes that are pumping
Oh I never tried it on the mac. I usually download stuff like that in windows
and put it on a jump drive to install on the mac.
Gord
On Jan 10, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never gotten the download manager to work for me. I always just click
the link and
QT damn shit
On 2014-01-10 21:04, Slau Halatyn wrote:
I was recently put in touch with the president and vice-president at
PACE anti-Piracy, the makers of the iLok key and the iLok License
Manager software. Since i made it clear that I wished to share their
response with this community, I'm
wo wo wo! Wait a minute here!
ILM is Ilok Manager? that's the same scheme used by JAWS! JAWS made it
accessible! Granted, they did so without the physical ILok dongle, and
yeah, they only give 5 activations, but! that isn't the point. the point
is, if ILok are the ones who made the ILM
Hello sir, or madam, sorry, not sure which you are.
Your comment did absolutely nothing to this thread, and quite frankly, say
nothing but ignorance in the field of QT knowledge. though I don't know much
about it myself, I can tell you it's not quote unquote: damn shit. It can be,
but what
Chris,
ILM and iLok License Manager are not the same thing. It's simply a coincidence
that the first letters for Pace's software product work out to ILM but that's
not the official name..
Slau
On Jan 10, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Christopher gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
wo wo wo! Wait a
OK, then, I stand corrected. My apology.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Slau Halatyn
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: PACE Anti-Piracy's response regarding iLok License Manager
accessibility
Chris,
ILM and iLok
24 matches
Mail list logo
