Well this is exactly what I figured. That is why I did not write the company.
It is a level head that will prevail and the record shows that. Great work slau
I understand everyone's need to have access to the lock.we will just have to
wait I believe that the challenge avid sent out can serve us
How quickly we forget. There was a fair amount of work that went into PT
regarding modernizing and updating a lot of the code base to get to the point
where all that was needed to be done was label elements and buttons. Yes that
process went relatively quick once the Program got to a point
Thanks John.
I'll try to contact to Toontrack again. But I don't think I'll get the anser
better than you got.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
John Gunn
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 7:33 PM
To:
That's a good idea Nick.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Nick Gawronski
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 3:11 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Superior Drummer with ProTools
Hi, I would reply and explain
The way I use Logic drums is to do all the sequencing in PT and dump the midi
into logic. Select a producer kit, lock the tracks to audio, then bounce them
out as multitrack. You’ll get about 12 files, 1 for each microphone. The new
logic kits are absolutely fantastic and incredibly playable.
On 1/31/15, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
How quickly we forget. There was a fair amount of work that went into PT
regarding modernizing and updating a lot of the code base to get to the
point where all that was needed to be done was label elements and buttons.
Yes that
I am going to use my roland v drum module to do that with. I can play them in
real time and then mix the audio in ProTools. My Roland sounds are great but I
just do not have the control that logic and ProTools will allow. Your
suggestion will help even more thank you.g
Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
We all had to learn, figure stuff out and ask questions at some point. As i
said i treat loops the same way i treat any other track audio. Thats the beauty
of it. So yes while we can’t see loop handles and drag them to extend them
with the mouse we can still select,copy and paste as many
To everyone that sent a letter to the B-B-B or made a call to Pace,
Feel assured you are being heard.
Pace’s CEO E-O Allen Cornce in an email to Slau Halatyn made reference
to a complaint,
Quote, “What I don't agree with is the assertion that accessibility
support is simple and easy. If it was, we
I plan to do my audio with ProTools I will do my midi things like drums through
logic Pro X.Matt do you not use addictive drums?
Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
On Jan 31, 2015, at 9:29 AM, TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
We all had to learn, figure stuff out and ask questions at
Thanks Kevin.
I'm using it with Sonar. Is it really accessible in LogicX?
I'm interested.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Kevin Reeves
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 9:11 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re:
Hi Ricky,
Just to clarify things a bit!
On our bimonthly conference call with Avid yesterday
BTW only Mike Vin myself were on the call this time!! ;)
the Pace subject came up as it usually does, and Lets just say the some higher
ups at Avid were contacted AFTER! the namm show by Pace.
He talks about balancing newer developments with legacy OS support so
far as I can tell, not bringing back any old APIs.
It's already been pointed out once, but I'll do it again. It took
years, and I do mean quite a few of them, before anything got touched
by Avid. During those years there were
I dono...
I guess I have mixed feelings. I agree with you on the one hand, but I also
agree with Mike. October? Really?
OK, look at it this way, no, the newer technology wouldn't necessarily be
implemented this way nor be totally up to date par, but! why couldn't pace
give us two
The reason the web API got killed if i understood correctly, was because it was
a piracy vector. There was some loop hole in it that iLok loaders in cracked
copies of PT was using. Either way i do remember it being a besuness decision.
Much like them not getting to it before v2.0. Say what you
Very well said!
E
Sent from Chris's iPhone in Barbados!
On Jan 31, 2015, at 16:54, Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
You Know Scott,
Call me an innocent. but reading this objectively, there seems no incentive
for this person to give you what you want at all, not now, or
Remember in Paces case Majority of their business comes from industry
customers, not end users. There for so long as PT and the other major business
customers continue to pay them and continue to stress that we need feature X,
Y, and Z to protect our assists yes we the end user could continue
Wow, how long does it take to type all that, even if you're a fast typist?
Sent from Chris's iPhone.
On Jan 31, 2015, at 13:17, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I dono...
I guess I have mixed feelings. I agree with you on the one hand, but I also
agree with
Hi. well i’m setting up a mix in p t. a couple of things i thought i’d ask
about. IHaving a small issue when soloing tracks.
i’m trying to sub mix some tracks. So i created an augs track, and then signed
it to a bus . i then sent the tracks i wanted to my augs track. all fine.
now. from this
All well and good...but again I do not speak of what you believe is or
is not important to the individual with the power to make this happen.
I speak of what motivates them?
And that answer might surprise you.
After all the argument about market share percentage has not prevented
others in
Well, word on the grapevine (which is all most of us have to work with
here) is that Avid are aware of the Pace situation. It's been hinted
here that the few people who have Avids ear are doing what they can to
keep the topic current whenever they have Avids ear. Beyond them, I
can't think of
Hi Poppa. actually i managed to get solo safe happening. Turns out what i was
doing was running my finger along the bottom of the track pad, locating the
left mouse button, and what i did not realise was that this was moving the
cursor. So i changed the way i do this, come in from the left hand
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
got it working.
On 1 Feb 2015, at 8:14 am, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
correction here.
i’ve looked again, and it is only happening on tracks assigned to the augs
Really don’t want to get in a back and forth about this, I would
rather we save our energy for the accessibility challenges outside of
this forum.
Also my schedule won’t allow it.
From first hand knowledge ProTools 10, and 11, in Mountain Lion and
Mavericks was unusable.
When I say this
got it working.
On 1 Feb 2015, at 8:14 am, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
correction here.
i’ve looked again, and it is only happening on tracks assigned to the augs
track, and the augs track it self. So this must be a solo safe issue i
assume. the question is, how can i
Karen,
I completely agree. You make some very valid points.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: Letter Update from Pace Anti-piracy
You Know Scott,
Call me an
I'm gonna pretend that I didn't hear that.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Letter Update from Pace Anti-piracy
Wow, how long does it take to type all that, even if
Surprise!
the nice thing about being human Scott is that we are all unique.
That means any number of things might motivate a person, sometimes at the
same time.
Now please remember I am firmly dancing outside of the box here.
But let me give you a very simple and totally hypothetical example
Yep, a lot of that makes sense Kare, and up until a few years ago I'd
have been in complete agreement. Since then, I've had what I suppose
you could call a crisis of faith when it comes to looking at the big
picture with this accessibility stuff. I'm not claiming this is right
necessarily, but
correction here.
i’ve looked again, and it is only happening on tracks assigned to the augs
track, and the augs track it self. So this must be a solo safe issue i assume.
the question is, how can i turn this on, and weather the track pad can be used
to do this.
Steve
On 1 Feb 2015, at 7:59
You found out that you needed to solo safe your busses and sends? PS, what
steps are you taking to click on solo safe? I tend to have to try a few
different key combonations until I get it right each time and it's a PEDA.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
That would be at best a waste of your time. I can say for sure from my
previous dialogues that the development team at Toontrack know what
accessibility is, and they aren't fussed about supporting it. Whether
that'll change as new blood trickles in, who knows, but right now
don't expect effort on
Not sure how to do what part in particular? Audio and rex loops are generally
just regular audio files you can import into a project and edit/ manipulate
like you can any other project audio. It’s advantage is it has tempo data
embedded in the file so getting it to snap to project tempo or
Well, a speculative date and some detail is more than we had
previously, and to be blunt, it's more than complaints would have
gotten us. Thanks for passing this along and keeping the dialogue
alive. If nothing else, I believe that it is on the radar of their
engineers ahead of time, a good sign.
34 matches
Mail list logo
