Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies

Kevin Richards wrote: This mention of owl:sameAs reminds me of the mention of the "sameAs issue", at ISWC, that has developed in the semantic web arena. I can imagine what this issue is, but am not 100% sure, so can anyone explain this issue to me? I remember there is a discussion on one

Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies

It may have meant a number of things. But if you look at thread "Managing Co-reference (Was: A Semantic Elephant?)" which you can find in the middle of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008May/thread.html you should get a sense of some of what might have been meant. A chunk of read

Re: A VoCamp Galway 2008 success story

François, We chose the current model (ds1 -> containsLinks -> ls -> target -> ds2) because we want to record which dataset contains the links. We have some use cases that require this. Your proposal (ds1 <- target <- ls -> target -> ds2) doesn't capture that bit of information. Note that

Re: A VoCamp Galway 2008 success story

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Richard Cyganiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > François, > > We chose the current model (ds1 -> containsLinks -> ls -> target -> ds2) > because we want to record which dataset contains the links. We have some use > cases that require this. Your proposal (ds1 <- tar

Re: A VoCamp Galway 2008 success story

Hi Richard, My problem is the following. I'm working on a system for interlinking and fusing Web datasets. The output of the interlink module is a named graph containing a set of owl:same_as statements (a linkset). This graph is itself described using a few properties indicating how it was ge

Potential Home for LOD Data Sets

All, Please see: ; potentially the final destination of all published RDF archives from the LOD cloud. I've already made a request on behalf of LOD, but additional requests from the community will accelerate the general comprehension and awareness at

Re: A VoCamp Galway 2008 success story

Thanks Yves. Sorry, I haven't had the time to get into the voiD details, but it is certainly the case that we have a lot of linksets that are independent of the KBs; in fact, that is our primary linkage mechanism. So if voiD has a problem with that, then there may be a problem. (In fact years of

DBpedia+Virtuoso EC2 AMI

All, Quick FYI. What is Virtuoso+DBpedia AMI for EC2? An pre-installed and fully tuned edition of Virtuoso that includes a fully configured DBpedia instance on Amazon's EC2 Cloud platform. Benefits? Generally, it provides a no hassles mechanism for instantiating personal, organization, or s

Re: DBpedia+Virtuoso EC2 AMI

Kingsley Idehen wrote: All, Quick FYI. What is Virtuoso+DBpedia AMI for EC2? An pre-installed and fully tuned edition of Virtuoso that includes a fully configured DBpedia instance on Amazon's EC2 Cloud platform. Nice work :) Benefits? Generally, it provides a no hassles mechanism for ins

Vocabulary browser requested

Hi, does anybody know of a working and feasible vocabulary browser? I'm thinking of some neat (preferably web-based) GUI which allows to load (autom. via some API in the back or manually by the user) several vocabularies which are possibly interlinked either explictly (by rdf:domain/range

Re: Vocabulary browser requested

Andreas Langegger wrote: Hi, does anybody know of a working and feasible vocabulary browser? I'm thinking of some neat (preferably web-based) GUI which allows to load (autom. via some API in the back or manually by the user) several vocabularies which are possibly interlinked either explict

Re: DBpedia+Virtuoso EC2 AMI

Dan Brickley wrote: Kingsley Idehen wrote: All, Quick FYI. What is Virtuoso+DBpedia AMI for EC2? An pre-installed and fully tuned edition of Virtuoso that includes a fully configured DBpedia instance on Amazon's EC2 Cloud platform. Nice work :) Benefits? Generally, it provides a no hass

RE: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies

Thanks Xiaoshu, very helpful. Kevin -Original Message- From: Xiaoshu Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 1 December 2008 11:29 p.m. To: Kevin Richards Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web Subject: Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies Kevin Richards wrote: > Thi

Re: Vocabulary browser requested

Hi Andreas, www.Knoodl.com is a web-based, vocabulary browser/editor which supports all that you ask for. It is publicly hosted and is free to use. Let me know if you would like any more information. Mike Lang On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Langegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi,

Re: Vocabulary browser requested

On Monday 01 December 2008, Michael Lang(Jr.) wrote: > www.Knoodl.com is a web-based, vocabulary browser/editor which > supports all that you ask for.  It is publicly hosted and is free to > use.  Let me know if you would like any more information. Oh, that's really cool! One thing I'd like to s

Re: Vocabulary browser requested

Hi, thanks for all the hints! I like the schemaweb, because it uses a crawler, but also like the other more "publisher"-oriented tools. I was looking for a more user-oriented tool. Basically we have to options to access a LOD dataset: browsing (thats what typically people do at the momen

Re: Vocabulary browser requested

The privacy policy of knoodl is worth a look before you put your stuff on it. In a brief bit of tryout I couldn't make a number of things work -- particularly visualization, I was really hoping for that one! -- but maybe it's because I'm Safari/Mac-ish? Or operator error. Anyway, I seco

RE: Vocabulary browser requested

The US National Cancer Institute oversees a large vocabulary curation and maintenance system for selected health care vocabularies. This is used in production so it is quite mature and reliable. The vocabulary management infrastructure is built on Semantic MediaWiki and Protégé. See https:/