=== Deadline extension: 22nd Feb ===
Due to popular demand, we have extended the submission deadline by one week
until February 22.
2nd Workshop on: USAGE ANALYSIS AND THE WEB OF DATA (USEWOD2012)
& USEWOD DATA CHALLENGE
Workshop at WWW 2012 – Lyon, France, 17 April 2
=== Second Call for Papers ===
2nd Workshop on: USAGE ANALYSIS AND THE WEB OF DATA (USEWOD2012) & USEWOD DATA
CHALLENGE
Workshop at WWW 2012 – Lyon, France, 17 April 2012
http://data.semanticweb.org/usewod/2012/
Overview
The purpose of this workshop is to
Hi guys,
the LDoW2011 data is being imported into data.semanticweb.org (just like the
data from 2010), so any URIs used on the LDoW website resolve nicely. However,
there are a few housekeeping triples that the LDoW dataset is missing (graph
name, workshop acronym, etc.), which means that it do
*** Extended Deadline: 15 February 2011 ***
Due to numerous requests, we have decided to extend the submission deadline for
USEWOD2011 by one week to the 15th of February. Note that this is a hard
deadline, there will be no further extension!
=== Third Call for Papers
Just a quick reminder that the deadline for USEWOD2011 is approaching fast!
=== Second Call for Papers ===
Workshop on: USAGE ANALYSIS AND THE WEB OF DATA (USEWOD2011)
& USEWOD DATA CHALLENGE
Workshop at WWW 2011 – Hyderabad, India, 28 or 2
Hi all,
ESWC2010 just got underway today in sunny Crete, and so we thought it might be
good opportunity to announce the addition of a new dataset [1] in the corpus of
linked conference metadata at data.semanticweb.org (aka "Semantic Web Dog
Food"): All papers (except posters/demos and workshops
Hi,
ISWC2009 is about to begin tomorrow, and we're sure to have an
interesting week ahead of us! Just like in previous years, ISWC2009
provides information about its papers, authors, events, etc. as linked
open data. The data is freely available at http://data.semanticweb.org/conference/isw
*** Extended Paper Submission Deadline to September 13th, 2009 ***
(apologies for multiple postings)
--
CALL FOR PAPERS
--
1st International Workshop on User-gen
(apologies for multiple postings)
--
CALL FOR PAPERS
--
1st International Workshop on User-generated Services (UGS 2009)
co-located with the 7th International Con
(apologies for multiple postings)
--
CALL FOR PAPERS
--
1st International Workshop on User-generated Services (UGS 2009)
co-located with the 7th International Con
On 25.06.2009, at 19:11, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Jeff Finkelstein, Customer Paradigm wrote:
Martin-
I agree that the .htaccess file is a big stumbling block for many
people
with low-cost hosting. Would a lightweight php-based application
that could
write to the .htaccess / create the RDF
Hi Martin,
On 25.06.2009, at 17:44, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Hi all:
After about two months of helping people generate RDF/XML metadata
for their businesses using the GoodRelations annotator [1],
I have quite some evidence that the current best practices of
using .htaccess are a MAJOR bo
Hi Luciano,
a lot of RDF libraries will do this for you. I usually use the rapper
tool [1], which comes with the Redland RDF API. Another option I find
nice is cwm (which can do a lot of other things as well) [2].
Cheers,
Knud
[1] http://librdf.org/raptor/rapper.html
[2] http://infomesh.ne
Hi Joachim,
all I know is that the original LOD cloud figure on the ESW wiki [1]
is made with OmniGraffle [2]. Whether or not there is some automatic
process involved I don't know.
Cheers,
Knud
[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData
[2] http://www.
,
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
From: Knud Hinnerk Möller
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:46:07 +0100
Hi all,
sadly I won't be able to attend, but I'm happy to announce that there
is linked data available for WWW2009 on the dog food server now [1].
It's based on data from EPrints I got from Christopher Gutteridge
(thanks to Daniel Schwabe for establishing the connection!).
Enjoy linking a
Hi,
On 20.03.2009, at 03:11, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
The point was this: _if_ you would like your data to be
incorporated into
the dogfood site, then it should have dogfood namespace URIs,
otherwise we
cannot serve it. We hope to offer people who want to contribute to
the site
what ab
s once you change a bit of the
data, e.g. correct the spelling of my last name in the page.
if its one source, then fine, the source is changed and its indexed
again if it has been copied.. everybody loses, i'd say :-)
Giovanni
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Knud Hinnerk Möller
wrote:
Hi again,
On 19.03.2009, at 14:58, Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Knud :)
2009/3/19 Knud Hinnerk Möller :
Hi Tom,
great stuff, and nice you're using some of our swc vocabulary!
Once a <http://data.semanticweb.org/ns/swc/ontology#DogfoodTsar>
always a <http://data.semanticweb.org/n
Hi Tom,
great stuff, and nice you're using some of our swc vocabulary! I'd
love to import the data into the dog food site - the more data we have
there, the better. However, as your data is at the moment, only the
people would show up as resources on our site, since everything else
is in
On 16.12.2008, at 17:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Knud et al,
I think Ravinder has started the process of fixing the current
Semantic Web layer cake :-) Which is a very good thing (imho, but
not seeking a Layer Cake discussion explosion).
I'd rather say his proposal (objects->facts->links
Hi,
I'm not sure about the discovery part - that seems to be more a meta-
layer with data describing linked datasets (VoiD [1]). However, I
agree that inference would have to be in layer 4 and up. Things like
non-explicit object consolidation, vocabulary and ontology mapping,
etc. will be
Hi,
On 28.07.2008, at 16:23, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Am I allowed to declare something as subproperty of rdfs:label?
As far as I know, yes.
I'm
guessing this is one of those things that is allow in RDF, but not in
OWL DL?
I would be surprised if that is the case. What makes you think so?
On 14.07.2008, at 09:55, Tom Heath wrote:
Question: is it worth creating a duplicate RDF graph by using RDFa in
HTML documents, when there is also RDF/XML available just one
I don't know how other stand on this, but I always thought of RDFa and
RDF/XML for solutions to different problems.
24 matches
Mail list logo
