Re: Deprecating owl:sameAs

ers have picked them everyone. Oh, when will they ever learn? Oh, when will they ever learn? ;-) Martin ------- martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de mh...@computer.org @mfhepp

Last Call for Papers: EC-WEB 2014 - The 15th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies

pages in Springer LNBIP/LNCS formatting. Plase also share this call with colleagues and friends. Best wishes Martin Hepp and Yigal Hoffner General Chairs, EC-Web 2014 Call for Papers EC-WEB 2014: The 15th International Conference on

Call for Papers: EC-WEB 2014: The 15th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies

(apologies for cross-posting) Dear all: Please find a call for papers for your reference. I think the following tracks may be relevant for you: Track 2: Data, Information and Knowledge Management for E-Business Track 3: Semantic Web and Linked Open Data for E-Business Best wishes Martin Hepp

Purl.org Service Down / GoodRelations Specification

OWL version in RDF/XML is available from http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.owl We hope that this issue will not persist for too long, but since purl.org is not under our control, there is little we can do about it at the moment. Best wishes Martin Hepp

Re: New Hewlett Packard patent may be a barrier to Semantic Web services adoption

these technologies. > > The current W3C Patent Policy was adopted 5 February 2004 and may be read at > [1]. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ > > > On Jul 31, 2013, at 15:1

New Hewlett Packard patent may be a barrier to Semantic Web services adoption

onferences back then, please ask your employer or legal department to challenge the patent. It may otherwise put the usage of SWS in business applications at risk. Best wishes Martin -------- martin hepp e-business & web science research grou

Call for Participation: GoodRelations & schema.org Tutorial at ISWC2012

http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Events/ISWC2012 Note: In order to take part in the tutorial, you have to register for the ISWC 2012 conference. See http://iswc2012.semanticweb.org/registration Best wishes Martin Hepp -------- mar

Breaking news: GoodRelations now fully integrated with schema.org!

involved, namely Dan Brickley and Ramanathan V. Guha from Google, and all the other supporters of GoodRelations, listed at http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Acknowledgments. Best wishes Martin Hepp martin hepp e-business & web sci

Re: Can we create better links by playing games?

PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> I can only add to Elena's statement - in fact, it is rather the exception >> than the rule that a Semantic Web task can be turned into a good game that >> attracts large, non-nerd audiences. > > I beg to differ. We all love quizzes. Just have to

Re: Can we create better links by playing games?

ote: > Am 20.06.2012 17:52, schrieb Melvin Carvalho: >> >> >> On 20 June 2012 17:44, Elena Simperl >> wrote: >> Am 20.06.2012 15:19, schrieb Melvin Carvalho: >>> >>> >>> On 20 June 2012 15:11, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> On 6/19/1

Re: Can we create better links by playing games?

iwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/silk/ > [3] http://aksw.org > [4] http://lod2.eu > [5] http://latc-project.eu > > martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0

Re: [Correction] :BaseKB Pro Now Available For Download

, then a single paying customer could regularly download and share your data with the world for free. Any university could do so on safe legal grounds. So your expected monthly revenues will be $ 199 in total. Is that what you intend? Best Martin Hepp On Jun 19, 2012, at 2:23 AM, Paul Houle wrote

ANN: The Accommodation Ontology for Hotels, Camping, Guesthouses, etc.

scenarios in schema.org. Any comments are very welcome! Best wishes Martin [1] http://purl.org/acco/ns [2] http://purl.org/goodrelations/ [3] http://tourism.sti2.at/index.php/Main_Page martin hepp e-mail: mh...@computer.org www

Re: best practice RDF in HTML

We discourage the use of large RDF/XML dump files in the context of GoodRelations, since they are a perfect entry for Denial-of-Service attacks. Also, properly deploying RDF/XML resources on production systems is often difficult in an enterprise context. Even supporting the rdf/xml media type ca

Re: best practice RDF in HTML

. Search engines do not seem to like such blocks towards the end of the page. Best wishes Martin Hepp [1] Hepp, Martin; García, Roberto; Radinger, Andreas: RDF2RDFa: Turning RDF into Snippets for Copy-and-Paste, Technical Report TR-2009-01, 2009. http://www.heppnetz.de/files/RDF2RDFa-TR.pdf [2] http

Fwd: [WI] CfP: International Workshop on Data Quality Management and Semantic Technologies (DQMST) 2012

sitaet der Bundeswehr Munich, Germany > Jing Gao, University of South Australia, Australia > Ke Xu, Microsoft, USA > María Espona, Asociación Argentina de Calidad de Datos, Argentina > Thoa Pham, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland > > > Workshop Chairs > ==

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

ntified and publish the resulting data. > > This would be a really useful service to the community in addition to > criticizing other people's work. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Martin Hepp [mailto:martin.h...@unibw.d

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

very > site it touches." > > Dan -------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

guring out what can be taken from such stats > to help guide linked data vocabulary creation and management. Maybe > others will do deeper focussed crawls, who knows? But it's great to > see this focus on stats lately, I hope others have more to share. > > Dan >

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

, Leon Derczynski wrote: > On 17 April 2012 16:43, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Thanks for your feedback. However, >> >>> PageRank does transfer along the edges of the web graph, so a highly ranked >>> homepage would transfer it's PageRan

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

g the Pagerank in this example, I used the online-service [2], which may provide only an approximation. [1] http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2012/papers/ldow2012-inv-paper-2.pdf [2] http://www.prchecker.info/check_page_rank.php ---- martin hepp e-b

New RDF recipe for outdoor trips and guided tours

Dear all: I just added a new recipe to the GoodRelations wiki, showing how one can describe guided tours and trips using GoodRelations, schema.org, and the Tickets Ontology: http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Cookbook/Outdoor_events Best wishes Martin Hepp

Re: The Battle for Linked Data

; >> Like others in this discussion I am typing one-handed, after earlier biting >> my arm off in preference to entering the Range-14 discussion again. >> But I do think this is an important moment for the Linked Data world. >> >> Best >> Hugh >>

Re: What would break? Re: httpRange-14

o/ns But I think you can hardly get this correct without 1. reading RFC 2616 over and over again and 2. having the privilege of getting feedback from Kingsley. ;-) Martin martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet

Re: ANN: WebDataCommons.org - Offering 3.2 billion quads current RDFa, Microdata and Miroformat data extracted from 65.4 million websites

be a better audience than public-voc...@w3.org On Mar 26, 2012, at 6:38 PM, László Török wrote: > > > Martin Hepp 2012. március 26., hétfő napon a következőt írta: > I do not think that most people take Common Crawl as a 0.0001 % sample of the > Web. > > I personally

wayfair.com adds GoodRelations in RDFa to ca. 2.000.000 items

/richsnippets?url=http%3A//www.wayfair.com/Sleep-Line-LTD-Deluxe-Feather-Bed-Pillow-CSNPDF31W-LDE1000.html Best wishes Martin martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusi

ANN: Free GoodRelations / Google Rich Snippets Module for xt:Commerce released

. With ca. 100,000 installations, xt:Commerce is one of the most popular shop applications world-wide. Kudos to Kevin Siegerth for implementing this! Please spread the word to site-owners running xt:Commerce/Veyton! Best wishes Martin Hepp

Re: status and problems on sematicweb.org

t;>> I think the community is small enough > > Small? The community around big data is exponentially growing. > > -- > Dieter Fensel > Director STI Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Austria > http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ > phone: +43-512-507-6488/5, fax: +43-512-507

Re: status and problems on sematicweb.org

le who started up the wiki. Please, don't >> let it be the rotting memorial to the past of the Semantic Web. >> - >> Sincerely yours, >> Yury Katkov, WikiVote llc >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Markus Kroetzsch > Department of Computer Science, Universi

Free GoodRelations Extension for Prestashop: RDFa for 100,000 Shop Sites

Prestashop! Best wishes Martin Hepp martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www:

Modeling value dependencies and complex quantitative values with GoodRelations

ension of GoodRelations. Best wishes Martin Hepp -------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www:

GoodRelations Service Update 2011-10-01 deployed: Microdata, schema.org, gr:License class

cached versions of GoodRelations! Best wishes Martin Hepp martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620

ANN: Multi-syntax Markup Translator: http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/

cense. Acknowledgements The work on RDF Translator has been supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research (BMBF) by a grant under the KMU Innovativ program as part of the Intelligent Match project (FKZ 01IS10022B). A huge thanks to Alex Stolz for this useful tool! Best wishes Martin

Re: Aemoo: exploring knowledge through pattern lenses

combining it with Facebook OGP: http://www.productontology.org/doc/Laser_printer#facebook Martin On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/3/11 5:12 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> You could take the same route thatwww.productontology.org is using for >> cl

Re: Aemoo: exploring knowledge through pattern lenses

Hi Valentina, >> [4] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.orh/ekp/owl/ nice approach - however, it would be much better if you supported content negotiation for the resources and provided HTML and Turtle and maybe OWL Abstract syntax in parallel to RDF/XML. You could take the same route that www.

Re: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison

; Martin, > > I must admit I did not follow all the intricacies of the relative URI->full > URI conversion, I usually rely on library functions (I know, I am lazy). But > if what you say below is true, isn't that a bug in the microdata spec? > > Ivan > > On Oc

ANN: Renault adds GoodRelations to UK Shop

ducts. Best wishes Martin Hepp [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/Volkswagen/

Re: Next version of the LOD cloud diagram. Please provide input, so that your data set is still included.

As usual, I suggest including the vast amount of GoodRelations data, as listed here: http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Datasets Note that sears.com has rdf:type links to http://www.productontology.org classes, which in turn link to DBPedia and Wikipedia URIs, so at least these 15,00

Great news! sears.com and kmart.com adopt GoodRelations in RDFa!

&blockNo=1&blockType=G1 Sitemap: http://www.kmart.com/Sitemap_Index.xml Plus, sears.com also uses www.productontology.org classes for describing the items. This is a great move in terms of leading edge use of Semantic Web technology for e-commerce. Best wishes Martin Hepp PS: If you have

Google Rich Snippets from GoodRelations in RDFa

%2FProduct%2Fdetail%2FRachael-Ray-Stoneware-2-pc-Bubble-Brown-Baker-Set-Eggplant%2F316398&view= Markup screenshot: http://yfrog.com/z/h339qpp Note: Currently, this may not work from local versions of Google at this moment, so please try google.com. Best wishes Martin

www.productontology.org is now schema.org-compatible

org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"; href="http://www.productontology.org/id/Retention_basin";> Instead of the empty element, you could also use if the WHATWG eventually decides to accept and in the document body, which would be a good thing.

Re: HTTP status for timed-out SPARQL query

> > Looking for some advice from the community. If we time out a slow-running > SPARQL query, what is the most appropriate HTTP status code to return to the > client? We had been trying 408, but the problem with that is that some > clients (notably Firefox) take it on themselves to keep retry

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

IPs or IP ranges or agent tokens of clients accessing /bottrap content. On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > Le 22/06/2011 23:49, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : >> On 21 Jun 2011, at 10:44, Martin Hepp wrote: >>> PS: I will not release the IP ranges from which the

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Sebastian, all: The community may not publicly admit it, but: SW and LOD have been BEGGING for adoption for almost a decade. Now, if someone outside of a University project publishes valuable RDF data in a well-above-the-standards way, you make him pay several hundred Euros for traffic just for

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Andreas, The difference is that amateur publishers enrich the Web with their diverse content. Amateur consumers cause trouble to the Web. Martin On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Andreas Harth wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 06/22/2011 09:08 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Please make a surve

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/22/11 8:05 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Glenn: >> >>> If there isn't, why not? We're the Semantic Web, dammit. If we aren't the >>> masters of data interoperability, what are we? >> The main question is: Is the Semantic W

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Hi Andreas: Please make a survey among typical Web site owners on how many of them have 1. access to this level of server configuration and 2. the skills necessary to implement these recommendations. The WWW was anti-pedantic by design. This was the root of its success. The pedants were the tra

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Glenn: > If there isn't, why not? We're the Semantic Web, dammit. If we aren't the > masters of data interoperability, what are we? The main question is: Is the Semantic Web an evolutionary improvement of the Web, the Web understood as an ecosystem comprising protocols, data models, people, and

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

, aiding infrastructure like > Ping the Semantic Web to optimizing delivery and even distribution of > the data among resouces. > > Best, > Jiri > > On 06/22/2011 03:21 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Thanks, Jiri, but the load comes from academic crawler prototypes firing

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

have themselves get banned, either in robots.txt, or >> explicitly by the server. >> >> - Steve >> >> On 2011-06-22, at 06:07, Martin Hepp wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> Thanks for the link! I will relay this to relevant site-owners. >>>

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

use fighting with bad semweb crawlers is taking too much of his time. Thanks a lot for everybody who contributed to that. It trashes a month of work and many million useful triples. Best Martin Hepp On Jun 22, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Yves Raimond wrote: > Hello! > >> The differenc

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

> and use delay pools [2] to catch hungry crawlers? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > [1] http://www.squid-cache.org/ > [2] http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/DelayPools > > On 21.06.2011, at 09:49, Martin Hepp wrote: > >> Hi all: >> >> For the t

Re: Think before you publish large datasets (was: Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers)

Hi Andreas: I do not publish large datasets, and the complaint was not about someone using them. The complaint was about stupid crawlers bombarding sites with unlimited crawling throughput close to a Denial-of-Service attack. You may want to ask the Sindice guys re implementing polite yet power

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Yes, RDF data dumps without traffic control mechanisms are an invitation to denial-of-service attacks. On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/21/11 11:23 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> A looong time ago, very early LOD days, we (LOD community) talked about the >> importance

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

Thanks for the hint, but I am not talking about "my" servers. I am talking about a site-owner somewhere in Kentucky running a small shop on www.godaddy.com who adds RDF to his site, informs PingTheSemanticWeb, and what he gets in turn are wild-west crawlers that bring down his tiny server by cr

Re: Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

nute intro to WebID >> http://bblfish.net/blog/2011/05/25/ >> (in browsers, but the browser is not really necessary) >> >> On 21 Jun 2011, at 09:49, Martin Hepp wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi all: >>> >>> For the third time in a

Think before you write Semantic Web crawlers

your colleagues and students to NOT write simple crawler scripts for the billion triples challenge or whatsoever without familiarizing themselves with the state of the art in "friendly crawling". Best wishes Martin Hepp

Fwd: [goodrelations] Google bug: foaf:page and Google Rich Snippets

I thought this might also be relevant for subscribers of these lists. Begin forwarded message: > From: Martin Hepp > Date: June 15, 2011 9:44:49 PM GMT+02:00 > To: goodrelations-list > Subject: [goodrelations] Google bug: foaf:page and Google Rich Snippets > > Hi all: >

Re: Multiple types in RDFa vs. in Microdata

#whatwg earlier last week. > > http://openspring.net/blog/2011/06/10/microdata-multiple-vocabularies > > Steph. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet > wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Martin Hepp > wrote: > Dear

Multiple types in RDFa vs. in Microdata

://www.foo.com/Type1"; itemid="http://acme.org/things#1> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"; href="http://www.foo.com/Type2";> This should result in <http://acme.org/things#1> a <http://www.foo.com/Type1>, <http://www.foo.com/Type2> . or am I mistaken? Best Martin Hepp

W3C plans to add the GoodRelations to the RDFa 1.1 default profile

roller Card Average rating: 4.9, based on 99 reviews That is great news! Best wishes Martin Hepp Links: [1] http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1#crawl [2] http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2011/06/09/what_are_the_most_widely_used_vocabulari

Re: Schema.org in RDF ...

I totally agree with Giovanni. But the key question will be real deployment - how much actual content will you contribute as compared to all non-academic Web developers. On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > my2c > > i would seriously advice against using triples with htt

Re: Schema.org in RDF ... expected Types in RDFS

I think that technically, the only thing they want to avoid is people using 2 - 3 different markups for *the same* content, but the way they are currently describe it may make site-owners think that when they want to please Google, they should leave their fingers off RDFa. So the crucial thing

Re: Schema.org in RDF ... expected Types in RDFS

A related matter: Neither Google nor Yahoo are abandoning RDFa parsing. In fact, they improved their parsing in the past two days when they started to accept price information in GoodRelations only if the gr:validThrough value is a xsd:datetime literal in the future. I noticed this when suddenl

Is someone from China crawling http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/ for research purposes?

a university server, trying to gather GoodRelations data for an ISWC submission or similar. If this is your script, please stop it! Apologies for spreading this so broadly, but the crawler does not identify itself and the IPs are from a pretty broad range. Best Martin Hepp

Re: Schema.org in RDF ... expected Types in RDFS

Jun 6, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/6/11 11:30 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >>> As the three major seach >>> engines agree on it, it will become a de-facto standard regardless to >>> wether we like it or not. >> >> Hi, >> do not un

Re: Schema.org in RDF ... expected Types in RDFS

> As the three major seach > engines agree on it, it will become a de-facto standard regardless to > wether we like it or not. Hi, do not understand why you all hop on schema.org. It is absolutely unclear whether schema.org will make it, for the simple reasons that: 1. The schema.org syntax fo

New GoodRelations Landing Page and Wiki

a visual relaunch ;-) In the next coming days, we will also deploy a much improved version of the GoodRelations specification in HTML. A big thanks to my team members Andreas Radinger, Alex Stolz, Uwe Stoll, and László Török! Best wishes Ma

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

, 2011, at 6:54 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/19/11 4:39 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Hi all: >> >> GoodRelations uses English keywords as concept identifiers, same as most >> programming languages except for machine code and most markup languages >> (e.g. &quo

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

Hi Alan, On May 19, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > On Thursday, May 19, 2011, Martin Hepp > wrote: >> Hi Michael: >> On May 18, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote: >> >>> This is a a limitation with current tools. >> >> &q

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

Hi Michael: On May 18, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote: > Alan, I'm glad you made that suggestion. I was also glad to see that Tim-BL > acknowledged that the URIs are just identifiers. Using URIs as identifiers does not imply they must not have human-readable components. Otherwise,

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

Hi Michael: On May 18, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote: > This is a a limitation with current tools. "Current tools", i.e. the ecosystem in which we expect broad adoption of SW technology, is not just a temporary, minor obstacle; it is likely THE most important aspect our technical pro

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

Hi all: GoodRelations uses English keywords as concept identifiers, same as most programming languages except for machine code and most markup languages (e.g. "h1" in HTML, "property" in RDFa) use English keywords. The main reason is that as soon as the raw identifiers need to be handled by hum

ANN: GoodRelations Snippet Generator now with support for www.productontology.org

GoodRelations to Websites of a small business, unless it is using a standard shop software for which an out-of-the box module for GoodRelations is available; for a list, see [1]. Best Martin Hepp [1] http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations#Shop_Software

Re: ANN: Ravensburg/Germany is the world's first city of Semantic Web-based Commerce and Tourism

Hi Kingsley, On Apr 30, 2011, at 11:45 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 4/30/11 4:51 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Hi Kingsley, >> Thanks - this is great! >> Martin > > Martin, > > Please confirm if both of these links work, I ask because there have been > repo

Re: ANN: Ravensburg/Germany is the world's first city of Semantic Web-based Commerce and Tourism

Hi Kingsley, Thanks - this is great! Martin On Apr 30, 2011, at 12:27 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 4/29/11 11:19 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Hi Tim: >> Simple answer: The Google Maps-based visualizations that I had quick access >> to are bound by the Terms of Use set by Go

Re: ANN: Ravensburg/Germany is the world's first city of Semantic Web-based Commerce and Tourism

for doing this. Martin On Apr 29, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > > On 2011-04 -29, at 05:24, Martin Hepp wrote: > >> Dear all: >> >> Ravensburg in Germany has just turned on the regular publication of >> complete, quality-controlled RDF/GoodRelat

ANN: Ravensburg/Germany is the world's first city of Semantic Web-based Commerce and Tourism

"LocationOfSalesOrServiceProvisioning" on the left side, then zoom into Ravensburg (this is near the dark black marker, in the middle of the Southern part of Germany). If you make any use of the data, please let me know. Best wishes Martin -----

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

design choice) and how we are documenting it. > > -Alan > > On Apr 21, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Martin Hepp > wrote: > >> Dear all: >> >> I am considering to rename a few conceptual elements in the GoodRelations >> ontology. However, they are already in use in

Re: Labels separate from localnames (Was: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

ter choice as compared to the alternatives. It is also easy to create graph of cleansed rdfs:labels for goodrelations based on a simple regex. Martin On Apr 22, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 4/22/11 7:36 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >>> See repl

Re: Labels separate from localnames (Was: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

See replies inline ;-) > Sorry to say this, but I think you are making a mistake. To say that the > rdfs:label has to look like a variable name because it is for Web developers > sounds to me like you are saying that the javadoc of a method should look > like a piece of code because it is addres

Re: Labels separate from localnames (Was: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

> owl:equivalentProperty accordingly. Naturally, if this evolution includes new > levels abstraction then rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPopertyOf should be put > to use etc.. Yes, that was in my original proposal. > > We can't really negate reasoning, especially when showc

Re: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

logy_IRI_and_Version_IRI > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/#Ontology_Annotations > [4] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns# > > On 4/21/2011 11:46 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Dear all: >> >> I am considering to rename a few conceptual ele

Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

e foo:NewNameIndividual instead" . c) Since the owl:deprecated property is not defined in OWL1, I would also add the following axiom in order to remain within OWL 1 DL: #OWL 1 DL compatibility of the OWL2 deprecated property owl:deprecated a owl:AnnotationProperty. Thanks in advance! Best M

Re: Design issues 5-star data section tidy up

--- martin hepp www: http://www.heppnetz.de/ email: mh...@computer.org

Re: Design issues 5-star data section tidy up

Hi Egon, for mashing / reusing data, you do NOT need widely open licenses; what you need are 1. STANDARDIZED licenses 2. that are identified by a URI so that you can simply evaluate what you are allowed to do with the data by simple URI comparison. Proprietary licenses are problematic, becaus

Re: Design issues 5-star data section tidy up

t > and Gold for the license? > > On 09/03/11 21:03, Martin Hepp wrote: >> Dear Tim, all: >> >>> ★ Available on the web (whatever format), but with an open licence >>> ★★ Available as machine-readable structured data (e.g. Excel instead of >>>

Re: Design issues 5-star data section tidy up

op site that obeys all linked data rules and puts out a lot of valuable data in RDF does not even deserve a single star. Best Martin Hepp On Mar 9, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Bill Roberts wrote: > I like the new(ish) addition to > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html on 5-star data.

Re: ANN: http://www.productontology.org - more than 300,000 specific OWL DL classes for types of objects

Hi Nathan, > [] a gr:ActualProductOrServiceInstance , > > gr:description "Condition: used." . see http://www.productontology.org/#faq5 and http://www.productontology.org/#faq6 "Q: Why is everything a gr:ProductOrService? Isn't this wrong and dan

ANN: http://www.productontology.org - more than 300,000 specific OWL DL classes for types of objects

Match project (FKZ 01IS10022B). martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unib

Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

Hi: On 20.01.2011, at 15:40, Nathan wrote: David Booth wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:08 +, Dave Reynolds wrote: [ . . . ] To make sure that dereference returns what I expect, independent of aliasing, then I should publish data with explicit base URIs (or just absolute URIs). Publishi

Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)

Hi, First: Thanks for the kind clarification! In parallel, we can discourage people to use rdfs:seeAlso to point to non-RDF resources in the future. It can easily be substituted by foaf:depiction for images and foaf:page for HTML resources without RDFa. Yes, exactly. FYI: The W3C HTTP

Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?

ck back specifically for that case). Please note that the W3C/WAI Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group welcomes comments and feedback on HTTP-in-RDF (despite the long passed deadline). Please send comments to >. Best, Shadi On 17.1.2011 20:23, Nathan wrote: William Waites wro

URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#Event http://purl.org:80/NET/c4dm/event.owl#Event as the same class. Any facts or opinions? Best Martin [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt ---- martin hepp e-business & web science research group univers

Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?

AI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070301#header ---- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://w

Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)

. Best Martin [1] http://developer.search.yahoo.com/help/objects/product#tab2 On 13.01.2011, at 18:41, wrote: John Davies. -Original Message- From: public-lod-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth Sent: 13 January 2011 17:17 To: Martin

Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)

Hi Tim: On 13.01.2011, at 12:29, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: On 2011-01 -13, at 05:10, Martin Hepp wrote: I don't buy in to restricting the meaning of "data" in the context of RDF to "RDF data". You can define "data" however you like for the purpoes of an

Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

data quality heuristics should not be solved at the conceptual level. If old clients employ outdated heuristics, those clients should update their heuristics, IMO. Best Martin On 12.01.2011, at 16:13, Nathan wrote: Hi Martin, Martin Hepp wrote: For my taste, using rdfs:seeAlso is perfec

Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?

Hi Tim: It was the FOAF folks who, initially, instead of using linked data, used an Inverse Functional Property to uniquely identify someone and then rdfs:seeAlso to find the data about them. So any FOAF browser has to look up the seeAlso or they don't follow any links. So tabulator always whe

ANN: Powerful PHP library for consuming GoodRelations data

developers to include GoodRelations data from public SPARQL endpoints in applications. Thanks to Martin Anding, Stefan Dietrich, and Alex Stolz for this great piece of work. Best wishes Martin Hepp martin hepp e-business & web sci

  1   2   3   >