Thanks Xiaoshu, very helpful.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Xiaoshu Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 1 December 2008 11:29 p.m.
To: Kevin Richards
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies
Kevin Richards wrote
: Richard Cyganiak
> Cc: John Graybeal; public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
> Subject: Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 26 Nov 2008, at 21:53, John Graybeal wrote:
>>
>>&g
On Behalf Of Harry Halpin
Sent: Friday, 28 November 2008 2:05 a.m.
To: Richard Cyganiak
Cc: John Graybeal; public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 21:53, John Graybeal wro
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, John Graybeal wrote:
> Do you think the argument is mostly settled, or would you agree that
> duplicating a massive set of URIs for 'local technical
> simplification' is a bad practice? (In which case, is the question
> just a matter of scale?)
I'm a bit late to t
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Halpin
Sent: Friday, 28 November 2008 2:05 a.m.
To: Richard Cyganiak
Cc: John Graybeal; public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Dataset vocabularies vs. interchange vocabularies
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
Hugh Glaser wrote:
We call this process "canonisation" :-)
I think you might want to call it "canonicalisation", unless you have
the appropriate documentation to show that your URI's are saints :-)
There's probably some ghastly pun lurking around there somewhere, but
I'll spare you...
Ian
On 27/11/2008 13:43, "Georgi Kobilarov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>> Do you think the argument is mostly settled, or would you agree that
>> duplicating a massive set of URIs for 'local technical simplification'
>> is a bad practice? (In which case, is the question just a matter
st,
Georgi
--
Georgi Kobilarov
Freie Universität Berlin
www.georgikobilarov.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John Graybeal
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 10:54 PM
> To: Richard Cyganiak
> Cc: public-lod@w3.o
Richard wrote:
And that practice can have additional practical/implementation benefits
(and costs). Hence, consider both options;
Indeed, and I think it is still too early to say which strategy will be more
practical and more sustainable in the long term. Right now, the focus of the
LOD c
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 21:53, John Graybeal wrote:
would you agree that duplicating a massive set of URIs for 'local technical
simplification' is a bad practice? (In which case, is the question just a
matter of scale?)
You are asking me if 'local
On 26 Nov 2008, at 21:53, John Graybeal wrote:
would you agree that duplicating a massive set of URIs for 'local
technical simplification' is a bad practice? (In which case, is the
question just a matter of scale?)
You are asking me if 'local technical simplification' is a good reason
o
On Nov 19, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Interestingly, this somewhat echoes an old argument often heard in
the days of the URI crisis a few years ago: “We must avoid a
proliferation of URIs. We must avoid having lots of URIs for the
same thing. Re-use other people's identif
12 matches
Mail list logo
