On 19/01/2009 21:51, "Kingsley Idehen" wrote:
> On 1/19/09 4:31 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>> Don't know if it helps, but the equivalent of the LOD diagram is at
>> http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.png
>> http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.svg
>> Or
>> http://www.
On 1/19/09 4:31 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Don't know if it helps, but the equivalent of the LOD diagram is at
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.png
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.svg
Or
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-circ.png
Although we don't
Don't know if it helps, but the equivalent of the LOD diagram is at
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.png
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.svg
Or
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-circ.png
Although we don't know about the incoming links, such as th
Thanks Tom,
Appended, with values as of today.
Or we can provide a separate picture (as well)?
I should mention that we had a chat with Richard about this when we were in
Galway, and agreed that the maintenance of the original one was a problem,
and maybe we would propose to add just some of the b
Hi Hugh,
You're absolutely right, the datasets hosted at subdomains of
rkbexplorer.com should be broken out and displayed separately in the
diagrams. I would certainly guess it's not intentional omission, just
accidental. Perhaps running those SPARQL queries and circulating
neatly formatted resul
