Hello,
I'm sending this out because I think it might be of interest to some
of you out there, and because I think very highly of Ingenuity's work
- I worked with their knowledge base for several years and enjoyed
working with the people there. Please respond directly to Ramon:
felciano a
Hi All,
Eric Miller, John Wilbanks, Elizabeth Wu, myself, and approximately
75 other experts in neuroinformatics and the neuroscience publishing
community are at the Pub Med Plus meeting sponsored by the Society
for Neuroscience, NIH Blueprint project, and the NeuroCommons/SC.
Floyd Bloom
I think it would be good to show this at the demo - it demonstrates
that "view source" is effective for the semantic web.
-Alan
On Jun 18, 2007, at 2:24 AM, William Bug wrote:
I will not be able to attend, unfortunately.
However, the Mouse BIRN Atlas Toolkit (MBAT) contributing
programmers
On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Waclaw,
Matthias, if you look carefully at BFO, you'll see that roles are
entities. This means that evidences, as roles, are entities.
Of course. I just wanted to differentiate that an ex
Dear All,
I have added some more stuff to this on Toulmin-style evidential
reasoning; I'll try and finish it tomorrow.
Matt
--
http://acl.icnet.uk/~mw
http://adhominem.blogsome.com/
+44 (0)7834 899570
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Waclaw,
Matthias, if you look carefully at BFO, you'll see that roles are
entities. This means that evidences, as roles, are entities.
Of course. I just wanted to differentiate that an experiment is not
an instance of any class ca
I think there is a very relevant discussion under way in HCLSIG which has
ramifications for our attempts to build an Uncertainty
Ontology. The wiki URL is included below, just in case someone may find it
useful.
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Evidence
Cheers,
Vipul
=
Alan, Satya, Matthias et. al...
Will be great if you could update the wiki with your comments.
Thanks,
---Vipul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 2:30 AM
> To: [E
-- Apologies for multiple copies due to cross
postings
CALL FOR PAPERS : WebDIM4LS 2007
**
International Workshop on Approaches and Architectures for Web Data
Integration and Mining for Life Sciences (WebDIM4LS)
December 3, 2007
http:/
I have been traveling a bit, and apologize that I have been slow to getting the
notes from the Banff f2f discussion on URI's onto our site, but here's a
synopsis for now:
- syntax of URI's:http://auth.org/db/id , http://purl.org/auth/db/id ,
http://myorg.org?urn:lsid:auth:db:id
- who sho
These links point to the majority of last year's URI discussion.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jun/
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Jul/
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Aug/
I looked at the document that
Hi Jonathan et al.,
Eric may add to it, but I just want to describe briefly what I know. At
the Banff HCLS-DI Workshop
(http://neuroweb.med.yale.edu/hcls/Welcome.htm), a number of authors had
presented their work involving their own URI convention/format. As a
result, there was a proposal ca
On Jun 13, 2007, at 12:33 PM, SATYA SANKET SAHOO wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am following part of this thread and feel like popping in.
Maybe it helps.
In clinical trials and 'evidence' based medicine the word evidence
is strictly defined and may no
13 matches
Mail list logo
