It's possible but I doubt it would go down as a Special Session. That
isn't to discourage anyone from trying though.
You could surely apply for a software demonstration slot, and anyone
can do a BoF.
You could also apply for a SIG meeting, but ISCB has become
increasingly careful in eva
Well, I certainly view ontologies as just one part of the semantic web
universe, particularly from the enterprise perspective. .02- MM
- Original Message -
From: "Andrea Splendiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Suzanna Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Paolo Romano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "
I think the bio-ontologies SIG and Semantic Web would intersect. One can do
SW without ontology and one can do ontology without SW.
I think the data integration idea is a much better one. I think it a
mistake to have too narrow a technology focus. The ISMB folk definitely
like to see some
Yes, right.
Can semantic web be seen as distinct from ontologies ?
best,
Andrea
Il giorno 20/set/07, alle ore 21:38, Suzanna Lewis ha scritto:
There has been a SIG on bioOntologies for the last ten years. If
you are planning on doing anything, then perhaps you should contact
those folk fir
There has been a SIG on bioOntologies for the last ten years. If you
are planning on doing anything, then perhaps you should contact those
folk first.
On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
my 0.001 cents,
If you look at the other sessions, there's nothing so
technolog
my 0.001 cents,
If you look at the other sessions, there's nothing so technologically
oriented. And there's already a session on ontologies.
Maybe a SIG ? (that by the way seem to be more interesting) with a
focus on data intergation in life sciences ? (just to give a
traslational touch).
At 16:50 20/09/2007, Eric Jain wrote:
Paolo Romano wrote:
as I see it, ISMB is always being preferring Science, instead of Technology.
In principal, perhaps, but "technology" stuff seems to attract
plenty of attention (maybe not as main talks, but as SIGs, BOFs,
posters and demos, plus of
Paolo Romano wrote:
as I see it, ISMB is always being preferring Science, instead of
Technology.
In principal, perhaps, but "technology" stuff seems to attract plenty of
attention (maybe not as main talks, but as SIGs, BOFs, posters and demos,
plus of course there are all the technology vend
Hello,
as I see it, ISMB is always being preferring Science, instead of Technology.
So, a session on the Semantic Web could be seen
as non adequate to the exceptionally high scientific level of the meeting.
My 1 cent.
Paolo
At 14:12 20/09/2007, Marco Roos wrote:
Hello all,
I would like t
Hello all,
I would like to show my support for the idea of my colleague Scott on
the list. I've heard rumour that semantic web people have started
doubting whether their own inventions, especially OWL, are catching on.
In my view they have to be more patient. As far as I can see there are
no
The next HCLS TC will actually be held on Thursday, 27th of September at the
usual time.
Thanks
Eric Neumann and Tonya Hongsermeier
HCLSIG co-chairs
The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
FYI
I suppose that it is a little too early for a special session at ISMB on
semantic modeling, semantic web.. Hmm.. Neural degenerative disorders?
-scott
--
M. Scott Marshall
tel. +31 (0) 20 525 7522
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall
http://adaptivedisclosure.org
--- Begin Message ---
F
12 matches
Mail list logo
