FYI--the American College of Radiology created the BI-RADS
terminology precisely for the purposes of providing a controlled
lexicon for radiology observations on mammography. Extensions on this
are needed to describe findings in ultrasound and MRI (future work in
BI-RADS). There is a possibil
2nd International Workshop on Web Service Composition and Adaptation (WSCA-2008)
Special Theme: Dynamic Services Composition and User Steering
Website: http://www.cs.uga.edu/~jfh/WSCA2008
July 8, 2008, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Affiliated with IEEE International Services Computing Conference 2008
HI Chris --
You wrote...
I think the only option here is to embrace rdf-reification (and to push for
better syntax, query and tool support).
Would the approach in question 8 of
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent
be useful ?
We map such queries automatically
On Feb 13, 2008, at 2:14 PM, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
Dear Matt,
I see 'trust' as a 'view' that can be produced by running a filter
over
the data (provenance). The filter would implement my trust policy, or
one of them. In other words, my trust in a given 'agent' can be due to
the fact th
Dear Matt,
I see 'trust' as a 'view' that can be produced by running a filter over
the data (provenance). The filter would implement my trust policy, or
one of them. In other words, my trust in a given 'agent' can be due to
the fact that it produces data using a certain algorithm. I also place a
Dear Alan,
Thank you for making my point much more clearly than I managed. I'm a
little wary of probabilities in situations like the one you describe, as
it always seems a little hard to pin down what is meant by them. At
least with the symbolic approach, you can give a short paragraph saying
I'd agree - I suspect that simply matching terms doesn't help that much
- we'd need to know the context of it, but then it all gets very sticky.
There is some work on mining the Chemistry literature from Cambridge
(UK) - using ? OSCAR/ Sci-ML I think
We've done a little work in the clin
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Kei Cheung wrote:
Hi Olivier, Alan, et al,
A prototype version of our neuroscience semantic web portal is
accessible at: http://neuroweb3.med.yale.edu
Nice :)
Thanks :-) . There is still a lot of room for improvement.
Bear in mind,
