I read the document and i really enjoyed.
Nice work.
One comment:
Under Q4. How should the RDF representation be mapped to global ontologies
or reference terminologies?
In relation to MIREOT: it may be worth to mention Ontofox (
http://ontofox.hegroup.org/) as a reference implementation of the
Hi,
probably there is not much difference. But with Semantic Web data, insight into
the structure of data is more of a key, as you don't have "schemas".
If I query a database, I would look at tables to understand a structure. If I
look a at a Semantic Web knowledge base, perhaps visualization is
Regarding visualisation of Linked Data, it should be avoided to fall victim to
what was called "the pathetic fallacy of RDF" in one publication [1], i.e.,
visualising RDF data as graphs because the underlying datamodel is a graph, not
because the use-case at hand requires this kind of visualisat
Speaking of Publishing, over the weekend, I noticed that the Country Codes and
subdivision codes (US&Canada) in "Citing Medicine"[1] are a bit out of date. I
can supply you with an ISO 3166 concordance, but you'll also want to address
the issue of "terminology" languages[3] and "bibliographic"
hi david and scott,
from my understanding, the common usage is a bit more confusing. good old
wikipedia has:
" The terms a priori ("from the earlier") and a posteriori ("from the
later") are used in philosophy (epistemology) to distinguish two types of
knowledge, justifications or arguments. A p
About the use of a priori , a posteriori - I will mull that over. I
was pretty happy with the way it seemed to communicate our thoughts, a
little attached actually.. :(
I think it might be better as "post facto"...??
M
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Booth wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 21:16 +0100, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> IG Note (Draft) HCLS IG Note on mapping and publishing life sciences RDF
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XzdsjCfPylcyOoNtDfAgz15HwRdCD-0e0ixh21_U0y0/edit
Excellent remarks, David!
Scott, your draft has coming along very nicely, and I believe it will help
creating additional excitement among the linked data community. With a couple
of compelling use cases we will be able to convince the skeptics that this is
the road to go.
Erich
-Original
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 21:16 +0100, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
[ . . . ]
> IG Note (Draft) HCLS IG Note on mapping and publishing life sciences RDF
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XzdsjCfPylcyOoNtDfAgz15HwRdCD-0e0ixh21_U0y0/edit?hl=en_US
Nice work on this! A couple of small editorial su
Dear all,
Apology that I missed today's presentation due to conflicting engagement.
I believe that we have had strong demonstration that LOD is right way to
go for data sharing and open access. But for HCLS, we still have way to
go to prove its efficiency for supporting data analysis kind of t
Here is another request for comments before we move the HCLS IG
Interest Group note below into html (still fluid but more viscous). I
am requesting comments from the LOD mailing list now as well, where
there have been several related discussions.
In the draft document below, we attempt to supply a
Hi all, it was indeed an interesting meeting. Definitely the topic is
really interesting, here is a nice review paper about visualizing linked
data:
Semantic Web 2 (2011) 89–124 89 DOI 10.3233/SW-2011-0037
IOS Press
Approaches to visualising Linked Data: A survey
Editor(s): Krzysztof Janowicz, P
Indeed, lots of exciting opportunities here :)
I started a wiki page to capture the essence of a task force and relevant
resources
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/Visualization
you're more than welcome to contribute to this document (add your name
too), and we'll soon discuss meeting times etc
m.
Totally agree, Thanks Lena.
Sorry I was not able to join the call today.
Joanne
On Mar 13, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Helena Deus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During the telco today Eric mentioned http://www.distilbio.com/ , which was
> apparently built on top of exhibit3, seems like a great way to start.
Hi all,
During the telco today Eric mentioned http://www.distilbio.com/ , which
was apparently built on top of exhibit3, seems like a great way to start.
I would propose not to limit ourselves to "ways to visualize RDF graphs",
but to actually try to plug linked data into data visualization para
Michel,
A task force on visualization is a great idea. And it would make sense to have
it aimed at and work with helping each of the other task forces utilize
visualization capabilities. It's something I've been thinking about with
respect to the work we did on the TMO/TMKB. How do we demonst
Related to this topic .
Changing the Equation on Scientific Data Visualization
by: Peter Fox, James Hendler
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6018/705
The changing face of visualisation in a world of data intensive science.
http://eresearchau.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/peter-fox.pdf
On
Hi Nitin,
That is rather broad. What's the goal? Is it only about papers? Or is
it to learn of actual implementations and how far along the industry
is with SemWeb uptake? Keep in mind that Pharma doesn't have an
incentive to publish about how well their enterprise applications work
(do they?).
H
Hi all,
At today's HCLS Life Sciences Forum (see minutes [1]) we had Alex Garcia
present on the topic of RDF visualization, indeed important for the whole
of the HCLS community. In addition to a Semantic Web Journal review article
[2], is anybody aware of comprehensive lists of use-cases for huma
*
TSD 2012 - SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS
*
Fifteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2012)
Brno, Czech Republic, 3-7 Se
Call for Papers:
18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management
(EKAW 2012)
National University of Ireland Galway Quadrangle
October 8-12, 2012.
http://ekaw2012.ekaw.org
The 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge
Management is co
*
TSD 2012 - SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS
*
Fifteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2012)
Brno, Czech Republic, 3-7 Se
22 matches
Mail list logo
