Here is a link to the message I sent out last year regarding handling
URNs in concatenated URL forms:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2005Apr/0010
This approach only works if it is explicitly agreed that URN's need to
be accompanied by a handler URL. As stated by ot
half Of William Bug
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 8:20 AM
> To: John Madden
> Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; w3c semweb hcls
> Subject: Re: [rdf] Re: URIs
>
>
>
> I think this is an excellent reference to work from, when dealing
> with the issue of URIs in RDF generation &
I think this is an excellent reference to work from, when dealing
with the issue of URIs in RDF generation & processing.
As I have always seen it (this is admittedly a the view of an RDF
naif), DOIs and LSIDs both seek to fulfill the role one would expect
to be played by URIs in the STM l
Alan et al,
Wow, great topic. I'll need to get my thoughts together on this.
Meanwhile, operationally what a uri "means" is clearly related to the
question of its (non)persistence. I recently found a wonderful
historical review of this topic from the point of view of a library
scientist.
[It was on this list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-
semweb-lifesci/2006Jun/0149]
-Alan'
On Jun 18, 2006, at 12:20 PM, John Madden wrote:
I can't locate the beginning of this thread. Did the discussion
start on another list?
Thanks.
John
On Jun 17, 2006, at 1708, Eric Neuman
I can't locate the beginning of this thread. Did the discussion start
on another list?
Thanks.
John
On Jun 17, 2006, at 1708, Eric Neumann wrote:
This is a very useful and important discussion thread, and I would
like to see others on the list to contribute their thoughts/
concerns as
Eric Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
06/17/2006 12:33:25 PM:
> May I ask all the contributors to include HTML links to any acronyms
> they reference (e.g., NAPTR)? This will make it easier for the rest
of
> us to catch up quickly, and to eventually collect the approaches out
> there into
This is a very useful and important discussion thread, and I would like
to see others on the list to contribute their thoughts/concerns as
well.
May I ask all the contributors to include HTML links to any acronyms
they reference (e.g., NAPTR)? This will make it easier for the rest of
us to
MW>
MW> I believe this SRV-redirection behaviour is part of the LSID spec,
and
MW> we use it for all of the BioMOBY LSIDs...
MW>
It also uses NAPTR's as described in IETF RFC's 3401->3405
to traverse the URN namespace, allowing the dereferencing process to bridge
the gap that separates authorit
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:41 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> something, but as far as I can see, the only authority related to
> namespaces in URLs is the DNS, and while there is the SRV field which
> might be used to direct someone to information about the namespace, I
> don't know whether
10 matches
Mail list logo
