On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
3) How are information resources (e.g. the very abstract ‘database
entry’, or the slightly less abstract ‘XML document associated
with a database entry’) best represented in BFO-friendly ontologies?
In my most recent revision, I line [
> "Evidence" is important, but is complex. If evidence is from
> collection of facts, then exactly how do those facts provide the
> evidence (there are many types of analyses you can do on raw data to
> produce evidence). So evidence is a function of the facts, the
> analysis method, the method o
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 22:20 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure
> 1) What relations do we use to connect a biological entity with artificial
> entities describing it, e.g. ‘protein records’, ‘sequence records’, ‘Pubmed
> records’?
I&#
At 09:43 PM 6/10/2007, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Matthias,
Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where
the HCLSIG
community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs
related to
"Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that
Matthias,
Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where the HCLSIG
community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs related to
"Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that
HCLSIG/BIONT can give some feedback on this:
1. S
eers,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 6/10/2007 4:20 PM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure
Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure
Alan did a great job at coordinating previousl
Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure
Alan did a great job at coordinating previously separate ontologies of several
participants of the HCLSIG into a coherent infrastructure for the Banff demo.
As we all agree, we should try to keep the momentum going and keep the pace of
ontology
I'd be happy to help post it on the site.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ivan Herman
Sent: Wed 5/16/2007 5:07 AM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: Banff demo
I have seen the mail of Bill Bug on the abstract, and
To break it down a bit more -
If the intent is to solely summarize the demo Alan gave as opposed to
the demo supplemented by Susie's introduction, here's the portion of
what is given below that was intended to summarize the PDF of Alan's
presentation - devoid of any context-setting or pedag
Bill,
that is certainly way too long and complicated for the audience of the
SW activity log. The text should be of 1-2 shorter paragraphs and aimed
at SW techies...
Ivan
William Bug wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Here's the revision of the abstract that was drawn directly from the
> Banff presentation
Hi Ivan,
Here's the revision of the abstract that was drawn directly from the
Banff presentation PDFs:
posted by Bill Bug on 5/12 as a summary both of Don & Matthias copy
and the Banff presentations -William Bug 5/12/07 10:22 PM
Accelerating integrative neuroscience research through S
I have seen the mail of Bill Bug on the abstract, and I was wondering
whether somebody of your group could write a one-two paragraph abstract
on the demo, with pointers, that could be added to the Semantic Web
Activity News:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/anews
this is, in fact, a blog whose rss feeds
Let me just say: it was impressive.
For those how were not at the meeting: the only comment was from a guy
called Giovanni Tummarello, used to be in Ancona and is now at DERI
Gallway: he went to the mike just to say, essentially, thank you in the
name of the whole Semantic Web community. If you ha
I would also like to to thank and congratulate all who helped with the demo,
and especially Susie, Alan, Kei, Don, and Eric P, for their steadfast
commitment and convincing presentation during the W3C Semantic Web track at
Banff WWW2007 last week!
The demo is quite impressive (go take a look a
iginal Message -
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Montgomery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "William Bug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Banff demo
On May 12, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Mark Montg
: William Bug
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: Banff demo
Vunderbar!
Thanks to all who worked hard to pull this off!
It's hard to get the full impact just perusing the slides, but it
looks to me that you pulled togeth
CTED]>
To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
Subject: Re: Banff demo - and pending Soc. for Neuro abstract
(due: 5/17 -
Thu)
Quoting William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Woohoo!!!
I wish I knew that last week when filing a grant progress
report. ;-)
But seriously Kei, that's wonderfu
orator. My google account is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have also requested access via google.
thanks,
jb
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 01:07:36 -0400
From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
Subject: Re: Banff demo - and pending Soc. for Neuro abstract (due:
enting"/first authors must be SfN full
or student members.
We should also give some thought as to which sessions we'd want to
submit to, and whether we'd want to request to give a talk or a
poster. The typical thing when you have >1 submission on a related
research eff
Adding to the milestones, the SWHCLS paper was just officially published
in the special issue "Semantic e-Science in Biomedicine" of BMC
Bioinformatics. See the URL below.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/S3/S2
Let's keep the momentum going!
Cheers,
-Kei
William Bug wrote:
Vund
would hope be more receptive.
Congrats- a good step. - MM
- Original Message -
From: William Bug
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: Banff demo
Vunderbar!
Thanks to all who worked hard to pull this of
Vunderbar!
Thanks to all who worked hard to pull this off!
It's hard to get the full impact just perusing the slides, but it
looks to me that you pulled together a very compelling demo that
examined several questions of biological relevance to neuroscientists
studying neurodegenerative dis
I have updated the page http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Banff2007Demo
with slides, pointers to the triple store etc.
-Alan
23 matches
Mail list logo
