Brickley; Konstantin Pentchev; Allan Hanbury
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
Dear all,
I have finished a first conversion of some key datasets from the "Linked Open
Drug Data" collection to schema.org with medi
I am thinking of the opportunity to use schema.org types and properties
to enhance product pages such as
http://www.astrazeneca.com/Medicines/Neuroscience/Product/Xylocaine
Especially in the light of proposals such as
http://worldofdtcmarketing.com/why-dont-drug-companies-provide-better-co
ntent
ing.ttl
[5] http://khresmoi.eu/
Best,
Matthias
From: Matthias Samwald
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: Aaron Brown
Cc: Dan Brickley ; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
Dear Aaron,
I think
Skickat från min iPhone
23 maj 2012 kl. 23:55 skrev "Matthias Samwald"
:
> Dear all,
>
> I think these details are relevant for reasoning about patient data et
> cetera., but the documentation of schema.org and the proposed medical
> extensions make it very clear that they are not intended
)
From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org] On Behalf Of R.
Cornet
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:26 PM
To: Michel Dumontier; Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
Cc: Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
Simon; Matt
can play. IMO, this illustrates the importance of defining roles and
>> entities separately (rather than through inheritance from a common parent).
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org on behalf of Jim McCusker
>> Sent: Wed 5/2
ub.w3.org
>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org] On Behalf Of R. Cornet
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:26 PM
>>> To: Michel Dumontier; Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
>>> Cc: Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
&
n MD, Simon;
Matthias Samwald;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org<mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org<http://schema.org/>
If you follow ontoclean [1], then all you need to know is that i
> *Cc:* Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
> Simon; Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
> medical extensions to schema.org
>
>
>
> If you follow
McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
Simon; Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RE: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
medical extensions to schema.org
I would say that if you follow ontoclean, being a patient is a non-rigid
prop
McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD, Simon;
Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
If you follow ontoclean [1], then all you need to know is that if not
imon; Matthias Samwald;
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
> medical extensions to schema.org
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
>
>> Ok. But I still don't see why this needs
ubject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
Ok. But I still don't see why this needs to be specified explicitly.
Otherwise, wouldn't it also be necessa
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
> Ok. But I still don't see why this needs to be specified explicitly.
> Otherwise, wouldn't it also be necessary to specify that a MedicalEntity is
> disjoint from a Movie, a SocialEvent, a DryCleaningOrLaundry, etc? It seems
> to get out of ha
On 22 May 2012, at 23:34, Dan Brickley wrote:
> We don't say anything like that at a schema.org level. Sometimes
> classes have common members, sometimes they don't. If you want us to
> record inter-class disjointness relationships within schema.org we can
> look into that, but for now don't assu
On Tue May 22 09:34:13 GMT-400 2012, Dan Brickley
wrote:
> On 22 May 2012 16:20, Aaron Brown wrote:
> > On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind --
On 22 May 2012 16:20, Aaron Brown wrote:
> On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
>>
>> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
>> marking up public information on the web for search use
On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella <
r...@semanticidentity.com> wrote:
>
> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
>
> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
> marking up public information on the web for search use cases, not for
> coding o
: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:37 PM
To: Matthias Samwald
Cc: Dan Brickley; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the input. I've added an experimental RDFa version of the healt
On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
> marking up public information on the web for search use cases, not for coding
> or exchange of clinical data. It might be extensible to a version of that use
> case, if com
cretary
>
> gumz.crys...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu
>
> 715-221-6403
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Aaron Brown [mailto:abbr...@google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 21, 2012 3:37 PM
> *To:* Matthias Samwald
> *Cc:* Dan Brickley; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
&g
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the input. I've added an experimental RDFa version of the health
schema (actually, all of schema.org + the health extensions) at
http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html
I'm not an RDFa expert so no guarantees that it's perfect, but hopefully
this
Dear Aaron,
I think it might be an interesting exercise to publish some of the "Linked Open
Drug Data" [1] datasets as microdata that adheres to the proposed extensions.
These datasets were published in RDF format by members of the W3C Health Care
and Life Science Interest Group. Mapping these
Dear Aaron,
I think it might be an interesting exercise to publish some of the "Linked Open
Drug Data" [1] datasets as microdata that adheres to the proposed extensions.
These datasets were published in RDF format by members of the W3C Health Care
and Life Science Interest Group. Mapping these
24 matches
Mail list logo
