RE: An Universal Exchange Language

-for.html - Dave From: Rémy Choquet [remy.choq...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:18 AM To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language When I see this: "Data Aggregation “Middleware” An important feature of to

RE: An Universal Exchange Language

enclosing one of our abstracts for further reading T N Bhat -Original Message- From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Clark Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:55 PM To: Mark Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: An U

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Totally kidding, Mark. I guess my "sense of humor" is a bit too dry. On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Mark wrote: > Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the > originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who > invented it!! > > Just pay

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

When I see this: "Data Aggregation “Middleware” An important feature of today’s environment is that there is relatively little standardization in the health data captured and stored by different providers of healthcare services. Although a great deal of data already exist in the form of claim

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who invented it!! Just pay me a salary for evangelism ;-) M On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:55:07 -0800, Tim Clark wrote: I think we are qualified and

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

I think we are qualified and should apply for the $ - we could make a YouTube video of our application and send it in. People could learn something - and we might get rich. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark wrote: > But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, w

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Right, and those "things" mean different "things" in different contexts (clinical, molecular, demographic, etc...) Which means also that the relevant metadata is different in the different contexts On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark wrote: > But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, we would need some form of unambiguous identifier for "things"... and given the distributed nature of the biomedical domain, we'd want to make sure that there was some way of resolving that identifier to obtain metadata about it from a

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

When is the proposal deadline and how many pages do we need? Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile -Original message- From: Mark To: Tim Clark , Joanne Luciano Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Matthias Löbe" Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:01:21 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: An Universa

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

anne Luciano wrote: > >> Tim. >> >> It's short for ROTFLOL. >> >> :-) >> >> Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile >> >> -Original message- >> From: Tim Clark >> To: Mark Wilkinson >> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, &

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Mark, please provide me with your bank account #, I will transfer the money immediately through my friends in Nigeria. On Dec 14, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Mark wrote: > give me the $40M and I'll tell you all about it! > > M > > > "Tim Clark" wrote: > >> Mark, that is very interesting, I was unawar

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

age- > From: Tim Clark > To: Mark Wilkinson > Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Matthias Löbe" > > Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:48:41 GMT+00:00 > Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language > > Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTF

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Tim. It's short for ROTFLOL. :-) Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile -Original message- From: Tim Clark To: Mark Wilkinson Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, "Matthias Löbe" Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:48:41 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language Mar

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

give me the $40M and I'll tell you all about it! M "Tim Clark" wrote: >Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTFL >language, please forward details. :-) > >Tim > >On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthias Löbe > wro

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Mark, that is very interesting, I was unaware of the new ROTFL language, please forward details. :-) Tim On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthias Löbe > wrote: > > >> Any suggestions? > > > ROTFL!! :-) > > M > > > > > -- > Dr

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Hi Mathias -- You asked for suggestions related to a future Universal Exchange Language. I'd suggest that the Language should look outwards towards human usability and understandability, as well as inwards towards the technology. Fortunately, there's a system that supports this. It's called Exe

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Jim wrote: "Like it or not, they were probably thinking of HL7 and ISO 21090. We would need to show how semweb solutions are a better solution, or how it is tied too much to healthcare, leaving out life sciences, population science, chemistry, etc. We don't yet have *a* solution for this, we hav

RE: An Universal Exchange Language

ber 14, 2010 5:09 PM To: Matthias Löbe Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language 2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe mailto:matthias.lo...@imise.uni-leipzig.de>> Hello to all, A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is architectura

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Actually, I'm fairly certain from interim, high level, reports, that they do have a semweb solutions in mind, but for unknown reasons modified the language in the final report. ?! On 12/14/10 2:09 PM, Jim McCusker wrote: 2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe >

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe > Hello to all, > > A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is > architecturally neutral, XML-based, extensible, optimized for > representing structured data, and that should have the ability to > include/ reference controlled vocabularies. That

Re: An Universal Exchange Language

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:54:10 -0800, Matthias Löbe wrote: Any suggestions? ROTFL!! :-) M -- Dr. Mark Wilkinson Assistant Professor, Medical Genetics Faculty of Medicine, UBC Principal Investigator, Bioinformatics Institute for Heart and Lung Health St. Paul's Hospital Vancouver, BC,