2008/7/23 Olivier Bodenreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Peter Ansell wrote:
>>
>> 2008/7/22 Olivier Bodenreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>
>>> Regarding the UMLS Metathesaurus, there are various kinds of restrictions
>>> listed in the license agreement
>>> (http://wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov/umlsl
Peter Ansell wrote:
2008/7/22 Olivier Bodenreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
Regarding the UMLS Metathesaurus, there are various kinds of restrictions
listed in the license agreement
(http://wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov/umlslicense/snomed/license.cfm), which is why most
UMLS-based services (e.g., Kn
Alan,
Good point. Maybe something more like:
http://www.ihtsdo.org/sct/23145879439
John
On Jul 21, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
[not cc]
Using "#" doesn't scale well if you ever plan to have a page per
URI, such as these that we are currently creating for OBI, and for
w
I
Even through SNOMED CT cannot be made available as a, say, RDF
endpoint, I think it is still useful to consider (non-
dereferenceable) URIs based on SNOMED CT concept identifiers for
annotation purposes in Semantic Web applications.
And as an IHTSDO rep, I agree with Olivier on the a
2008/7/22 Olivier Bodenreider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> As the NLM guy on this forum, I probably need to clarify the intellectual
> property restriction issues with the UMLS.
>
> The Semantic Network is entirely owned by NLM and free of IP restrictions.
> Conversion to OWL has been studied in the p
As the NLM guy on this forum, I probably need to clarify the
intellectual property restriction issues with the UMLS.
The Semantic Network is entirely owned by NLM and free of IP
restrictions. Conversion to OWL has been studied in the past by... Vipul
(yes, "our" Vipul).
Representing the UM
> However, what would be possibly even more useful, is if you
> are willing to share the conversion methods rather than the
> outcome. In this way, people can use the method to create
> their own representation of SNOMED CT if they have the
> license for the original version. Moreover, they
nt: Sunday, July 20, 2008 01:41
> To: eric neumann; Kei Cheung
> Cc: Susie M Stephens; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: BioRDF Announcement
>
>
> On 7/17/08 4:22 PM, "eric neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I had mentioned before, having
On 7/17/08 4:22 PM, "eric neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I had mentioned before, having all of NLM's MeSH and much of UMLS available
> as RDF/SKOS/OWL for researchers would be very well received by the growing SW
> community. I'd like to add this to the list of BioRDF activities going
>
Kei,
Happy to hear we'll be looking at other potential 'key areas' for
accelerating adoption.
I would put close to top of the list how we can help establish stable URI
for public data with reasonable RDF models behind them (resolvable). Having
several versions of NCBI data was OK for phase 1, but
Hi Eric,
As listed at http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup, the old BioRDF
objectives were:
1. Build a life sciences demo that spans from bench to bedside using RDF and OWL to gain a stronger understanding as to the work required.
2. Explore the effectiveness of current tools fo
Hi Kei, Susie,
Can you point me to the new objectives of BioRDF-- been out of the loop for
a while and would like to see our new directions based on our earlier
lessons learned.
cheers,
Eric
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am honored but also humbled
I am honored but also humbled with this announcement. I am fortunate to
be part of this great community effort. I look forward to working with
all of you and others to extend this community effort.
Cheers,
-Kei
Susie M Stephens wrote:
We're very pleased to announce that Kei Cheung is goin
13 matches
Mail list logo
