Brickley; Konstantin Pentchev; Allan Hanbury
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
Dear all,
I have finished a first conversion of some key datasets from the "Linked Open
Drug Data" collection to schema.org with medi
I am thinking of the opportunity to use schema.org types and properties
to enhance product pages such as
http://www.astrazeneca.com/Medicines/Neuroscience/Product/Xylocaine
Especially in the light of proposals such as
http://worldofdtcmarketing.com/why-dont-drug-companies-provide-better-co
ntent
Dear all,
I have finished a first conversion of some key datasets from the "Linked Open
Drug Data" collection to schema.org with medical extensions. At the moment, I
converted the datasets from Drugbank [1] and Dailymed [2]. I can work on
mapping other datasets such as RxNorm, DBpedia and Clini
Skickat från min iPhone
23 maj 2012 kl. 23:55 skrev "Matthias Samwald"
:
> Dear all,
>
> I think these details are relevant for reasoning about patient data et
> cetera., but the documentation of schema.org and the proposed medical
> extensions make it very clear that they are not intended
)
From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org] On Behalf Of R.
Cornet
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:26 PM
To: Michel Dumontier; Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
Cc: Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
Simon; Matt
can play. IMO, this illustrates the importance of defining roles and
>> entities separately (rather than through inheritance from a common parent).
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org on behalf of Jim McCusker
>> Sent: Wed 5/2
ub.w3.org
>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@listhub.w3.org] On Behalf Of R. Cornet
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:26 PM
>>> To: Michel Dumontier; Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
>>> Cc: Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
&
n MD, Simon;
Matthias Samwald;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org<mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org<http://schema.org/>
If you follow ontoclean [1], then all you need to know is that i
> *Cc:* Jim McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
> Simon; Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
> medical extensions to schema.org
>
>
>
> If you follow
McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD,
Simon; Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RE: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
medical extensions to schema.org
I would say that if you follow ontoclean, being a patient is a non-rigid
prop
McCusker; Aaron Brown; Dan Brickley; Renato Iannella; Lin MD, Simon;
Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
If you follow ontoclean [1], then all you need to know is that if not
imon; Matthias Samwald;
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health &
> medical extensions to schema.org
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
>
>> Ok. But I still don't see why this needs
ubject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
Ok. But I still don't see why this needs to be specified explicitly.
Otherwise, wouldn't it also be necessa
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
> Ok. But I still don't see why this needs to be specified explicitly.
> Otherwise, wouldn't it also be necessary to specify that a MedicalEntity is
> disjoint from a Movie, a SocialEvent, a DryCleaningOrLaundry, etc? It seems
> to get out of ha
On 22 May 2012, at 23:34, Dan Brickley wrote:
> We don't say anything like that at a schema.org level. Sometimes
> classes have common members, sometimes they don't. If you want us to
> record inter-class disjointness relationships within schema.org we can
> look into that, but for now don't assu
On Tue May 22 09:34:13 GMT-400 2012, Dan Brickley
wrote:
> On 22 May 2012 16:20, Aaron Brown wrote:
> > On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind --
On 22 May 2012 16:20, Aaron Brown wrote:
> On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
>>
>> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
>> marking up public information on the web for search use
On Tue May 22 00:15:04 GMT-400 2012, Renato Iannella <
r...@semanticidentity.com> wrote:
>
> On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
>
> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
> marking up public information on the web for search use cases, not for
> coding o
: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:37 PM
To: Matthias Samwald
Cc: Dan Brickley; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical
extensions to schema.org
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the input. I've added an experimental RDFa version of the healt
On 22 May 2012, at 10:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
> The schema wasn't designed with that use case in mind -- it's focused on
> marking up public information on the web for search use cases, not for coding
> or exchange of clinical data. It might be extensible to a version of that use
> case, if com
cretary
>
> gumz.crys...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu
>
> 715-221-6403
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Aaron Brown [mailto:abbr...@google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 21, 2012 3:37 PM
> *To:* Matthias Samwald
> *Cc:* Dan Brickley; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
&g
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the input. I've added an experimental RDFa version of the health
schema (actually, all of schema.org + the health extensions) at
http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html
I'm not an RDFa expert so no guarantees that it's perfect, but hopefully
this
22 matches
Mail list logo
