> "Carole" == Carole Goble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carole> Phil
Carole> er which bit of "I agree" with you don't you get? :-) :-)
Carole> I agree with you!
The bit after it:-)
We are in furious agreement anyway, which is the main thing.
Phil
Kei
yes - reproducibility is predicated on preservability -- that is one of
Phil's points
Carole
Hi Carole et al.,
Does preservability relate to the 3 R's?
-Kei
Carole Goble wrote:
Phil
er which bit of "I agree" with you don't you get? :-) :-)
I agree with you! That is why we hav
Hi Carole et al.,
Does preservability relate to the 3 R's?
-Kei
Carole Goble wrote:
Phil
er which bit of "I agree" with you don't you get? :-) :-)
I agree with you! That is why we have a whole programme of work with
BioCatalogue for workflow monitoring, workflow decay management,
serv
Phil
er which bit of "I agree" with you don't you get? :-) :-)
I agree with you! That is why we have a whole programme of work with
BioCatalogue for workflow monitoring, workflow decay management, service
monitoring, sharing data using packs in myExperiment and e-Labs etc.
Carole
Carole
I don't confuse the concepts, although I sometimes get the names mixed up.
In this case, uploading a workflow (taverna or otherwise) is not going to
guarantee either. I would not expect the workflow that you gave me last year
would necessarily either run now, nor give me the same resul
Phil
yes - do not confuse Reproducibility with Repeatability or Reusability
Carole
Carole Goble
University of Manchester. UK
"KC" == Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KC> Peter Ansell wrote:
>> Wiki's explicitly allow for a permanent link to a particular version of
>
Matthias
sorry for the delayed response -- been on a Greek Island for 3 weeks.
ermyExperiment isn't a wiki. Its a Web 2.0 collaborative environment
built on top of Ruby on Rails.
We have plans to edit workflows through a web interface BUT this is very
limited -- frankly, workflows are p
Paolo Romano wrote:
At 11:31 21/08/2008, Phillip Lord wrote:
> "KC" == Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KC> If some journals are requiring raw data (e.g., microarray data)
to be
KC> submitted to a public data repository, I wonder if workflows
that are
KC> used to analyze th
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Taswell
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:14 AM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Cc: 'Barry Smith'
Subject: RE: Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences:
progress, visions and challenges
Hi,
I'd like to add t
At 11:31 21/08/2008, Phillip Lord wrote:
> "KC" == Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KC> If some journals are requiring raw data (e.g., microarray data) to be
KC> submitted to a public data repository, I wonder if workflows that are
KC> used to analyze the data should also be su
> "KC" == Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KC> Peter Ansell wrote:
>> Wiki's explicitly allow for a permanent link to a particular version of
>> something. Hopefully an implementation of a wiki-like workflow editor
>> online, will have similar characteristics so that you can sti
ay, 20 August, 2008 8:11:36 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane
Subject: Re: Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences:
progress, visions and challenges
Hi Matthias,
Interesting remarks. You'll be interested to know that 'webifying'
workflows (in various ways) is one of the pri
Hi Adrian et al,
Thanks for the information. I just wonder how clinical workflow might be
different from or the same as biological workflow.
Also, I just noticed Licoln Stein was copied in this email. Below is my
early response to Duncan's email:
"It looks like there are a number of ways f
, 20 August, 2008 8:11:36 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane
> Subject: Re: Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences:
> progress, visions and challenges
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Interesting remarks. You'll be interested to know that 'webifying'
> workflows (
Hi Matthias,
Interesting remarks. You'll be interested to know that 'webifying'
workflows (in various ways) is one of the prime interests of people at
myGrid and myExperiment. My personal opinion, a bit from a biologist's
perspective, is that we should be careful not to loose some aspects of
I think the INB in spain have a web-based editor (at least for Moby
services). It's called MOWServ: http://www.connotea.org/tag/MOWserv
M
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:44:46 -0700, David De Roure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
We'd be really pleased to work with anyone interested in developin
Duncan Hull wrote:
Hello Kei
Glad you liked the article.
On 20 Aug 2008, at 14:27, Kei Cheung wrote:
"To my knowledge, there is currently only one project that aims to
bring the pure semantic web to biomedical research. That project is
the Simple Semantic Web Architecture and Protocol (
Peter Ansell wrote:
I hadn't looked at DERI pipes for a while, but it has improved a lot since
last time.
It would be nice to get to the stage where the control flow can be
supported in the same way as Yahoo Pipes.
I wonder if Yahoo Pipes will eventually support SPARQL and RDF in the same
way
Hi All --
Here's another possible item for a cyberinfrastructure.
It's a kind of Wiki for content, written as syllogism-flavored rules, in
*executable* English.
It's live on the Web, and shared use is free.
It also works as an SOA endpoint on the Web.
Here are some examples of a biological an
Hello Kei
Glad you liked the article.
On 20 Aug 2008, at 14:27, Kei Cheung wrote:
"To my knowledge, there is currently only one project that aims to
bring the pure semantic web to biomedical research. That project
is the Simple Semantic Web Architecture and Protocol (SSWAP30)"
It's ni
Matthias Samwald wrote:
Kei Cheung wrote:
Also, it's interesting to see scientific workflows can be published
via Wiki (e.g., myExperiment).
But as far as I know, myExperiment does not allow editing the actual
workflows online, you can only upload and visualize workflow files
that have
Hi Matthias
Just a quick response as director of myExperiment. What you describe - which I
see as even more collaborative editing/authoring of workflows - is very
interesting and could certainly fit well with myExperiment. We'd be really
pleased to work with anyone interested in developing thi
- "Matthias Samwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Matthias Samwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "public-semweb-lifesci"
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 August, 2008 6:53:09 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane
> Subject: Re: Towards a cyberinfrastructure
Kei Cheung wrote:
Also, it's interesting to see scientific workflows can be published via
Wiki (e.g., myExperiment).
But as far as I know, myExperiment does not allow editing the actual
workflows online, you can only upload and visualize workflow files that have
been created on the client-si
uncan Hull wrote:
Hello
A new paper in Nature Reviews Genetics that talks about semantics in
various contexts in the life sciences, might be of interest to this
list...
Stein, L. D. (2008). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological
sciences: progress, visions and challenges. Nat
Hello
A new paper in Nature Reviews Genetics that talks about semantics in
various contexts in the life sciences, might be of interest to this
list...
Stein, L. D. (2008). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological
sciences: progress, visions and challenges. Nat Rev Genet, 9(9
26 matches
Mail list logo
