On 5/2/11, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
> Apologies. I feel like I have failed to properly contextualize this issue.
>
> Let me back up and see if I can't help create a different frame of
> reference. This email is already too long so I've avoided examples.
> Please let me know what isn't apparent and
Apologies. I feel like I have failed to properly contextualize this issue.
Let me back up and see if I can't help create a different frame of
reference. This email is already too long so I've avoided examples.
Please let me know what isn't apparent and I'll explain further.
1) Imperative templat
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
>> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
>> interface names while still acce
On , Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
Hi,
a question related to the evolving draft on
http://www.w3.org/TR/clipboard-apis/ (which actually is slightly better
styled on http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html - I should
figure out why ;-))
We want to enable some sort of access to HTML cod
It's pretty much impossible for me to figure out which things are new
or which i've missed in previous rounds. (It's also possible that I
didn't review this spec, in which case, I'm sorry.) I don't believe
these comments significantly affect the document, i.e. they're mostly
editorial, although som
Hallvord,
Le 2 mai 2011 à 09:00, Hallvord R. M. Steen a écrit :
>> I am not at all against your proposal but I tend to see two reasons
>> "against" it:
>> - I expect mostly the server to be providing the HTML, the javascript code
>> does probably not need to process it further (they trust each
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
> interface names while still accepting null values.
>
> / Jonas
This implies the bug can be
I see this as a possibly useful feature, even if it may not bring a
sensible difference for CKEditor.
In CKEditor we do clipboard data manipulation through the following steps:
1. Take the data string and send it to the browser, so it can clean up
things a bit (we set innerHTML for a ).
2.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Keean Schupke wrote:
> As long as we have a binary mode I am happy.
Something I didn't think to mention: what exactly is "binary mode" for
DOMStrings? I guess it means you encode as big-endian UTF-16, then
sort bytewise? This is kind of evil, but it matches what
After calling the clear() method on IDBObjectStore, the result of the
IDBRequest is set to undefined according to the "steps for clearing an object
store".
However, the result property in IDBRequest says that the result value is
undefined when the request results in an error: "This is undefined
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Simon Heckmann wrote:
> There is a new version of the proposal out:
> http://www.simonheckmann.de/proposal/draft2
> This gets problematic when a browser has to ask for several permissions at
> the same time. Figure 1 illustrates this behaviour as seen in Google Ch
On Friday, April 29, 2011 at 8:19 PM, frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
> Marcos
>
> I'd suggest you first send an email with the top 10 substantive changes to
> the list, e.g. which algorithms change from mandatory to optional or optional
> to mandatory etc, which processing rules you are re
Hi Tab, All - can you Tab, or someone else, commit to processing the
comments and bugs for the Workers LCWD?
Given Hixie's bug list [1], perhaps we shouldn't wait for him.
-Art
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0385.html
On Apr/28/2011 1:35 PM, ext Arthur Barst
Marcos, All - re processing comments submitted against the 22-Mar-2011
P&C LCWD, FYI, below are the comments I noted.
Are there any other comments, bugs, etc. that need to be considered?
-AB
Original Message
Subject: [widgets] Reminder: Last Call Working Draft of Widgets P&C
On 05/02/2011 04:50 AM, ext Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
event.clipboardData.getDocumentFragment()
which would return a parsed and when applicable sanitized view of any
markup the implementation supports from the clipboard. Rich text editors
could now use normal DOM methods to dig through the con
On Sunday, 1 May 2011, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> I agree that we will eventually want to standardize the set of allowed
>> collations. Similarly to how we'll want to standardize on one set of
>> charset encodings supported. However I don't thin
Am 02.05.2011 um 10:28 schrieb Charles McCathieNevile:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 10:04:58 +0200, Simon Heckmann
> wrote:
>
>> There is a new version of the proposal out:
>> http://www.simonheckmann.de/proposal/draft2
>
> You're thinking along very similar lines to the way we are thinking inside
On Mon, 02 May 2011 10:04:58 +0200, Simon Heckmann
wrote:
There is a new version of the proposal out:
http://www.simonheckmann.de/proposal/draft2
You're thinking along very similar lines to the way we are thinking inside
Opera about this problem, in terms of UI.
However, I'm not so sur
There is a new version of the proposal out:
http://www.simonheckmann.de/proposal/draft2
Am 29.04.2011 um 15:33 schrieb Simon Heckmann:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have read a lot in the last month about the future of html and web
> applications and I am very impressed by the progress this makes.
Hello everyone,
I have read a lot in the last month about the future of html and web
applications and I am very impressed by the progress this makes. However, I
have come across some thing that annoys me: Permissions. I know they are
important and I know they are needed but currently I find th
Hello everyone,
I have read a lot in the last month about the future of html and web
applications and I am very impressed by the progress this makes. However, I
have come across some thing that annoys me: Permissions. I know they are
important and I know they are needed but currently I find th
21 matches
Mail list logo