On 9/25/14 9:32 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Ok so, let's start getting consensus on the new pub work flow [1]. I want us to
be the first using the new pub process the second it is available.
Does anyone object to Editors in this group using [1]?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/pubworkflow.html
[ Bcc webp...@ietf.org ]
Hi All,
I recall the IETF's intent to create a web-based push notifications
protocol standard was previously announced on this list. Please note the
draft charter for this WG explicitly mentions WebApps:
[[
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-webpush/
...
On 9/22/14 3:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I think the latest documentation is pretty complete except it’s missing one
major feature: selection.modify [1].
There was a discussion that took place in WHATWG [2] and there was a
disagreement on the use case and the purpose of this particular API
Ryosuke proposes WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of
Selection API and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the
following Editor's Draft as the basis (draft FPWD is [1]):
http://w3c.github.io/selection-api/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen
Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the
latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis:
https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/
The spec has three open Issues, all labeled
Hi Ryosuke, Ben, Kenji, All,
I'm looking for feedback about moving the Selection API [ED] to First
Public Working Draft (FPWD) ...
A `rule of thumb` I generally use when considering if a spec is ready
for a FPWD is if the feature set is mostly complete although there is no
expectation all
All - I just noticed the Uniform Messaging Policy (UMP) [TR] (which
WebApps abandoned several years ago) was never published as a WG Note,
thus someone could mistakenly think the spec is still in development. To
help prevent such a mistake, this is a Call for Consensus to:
a) publish a WG
On 9/15/14 4:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us
know before the 18th.
Although there were some technical comments in reply to this PSA (and
that's great, please keep the comments coming!), as we previously
agreed, those comments
On 9/10/14 10:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Editors, All,
Speaking of ED boilerplate data ... do we want to try to get some
consistency regarding
On 7/9/14 4:15 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Bcc: public-pointer-events ]
FYI, Robin reports the availability of minutes from the September 11 EWS
in Berlin:
[[
as you may know, last week the second edition of the Extensible Web
Summit took place in Berlin. It was fun an interesting
This is a heads-up Hallvord intends to publish a WD of Clipboard API
and events and he is targeting a publication date of September 18. The ED
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html
If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us
know before the 18th.
Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen Orientation
API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the latest ED (not yet
in the LCWD template) as the basis:
https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/
The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and
This is a reminder WebApps will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 27
and 28) during [TPAC2014]. Registration for WebApps' meeting (as well as
all other meetings and events that week) is mandatory.
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/
The registration deadline is October 8. The
[ Sorry for the cross-posting but this is about a joint WD publication
between WebApps and TAG. ]
This is heads-up (aka PublicServiceAnnoucement) about the intent to
publish a new WD of the URL spec (on or around Sept 16) using this ED as
the basis:
http://w3ctag.github.io/url/
As
Subject: [Pubrules] Revised Proposed changes regarding references to
editors' drafts
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:13:48 -0500
From: Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
To: spec-p...@w3.org Prod spec-p...@w3.org
CC: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com, Marcos Caceres
w...@marcosc.com
Hello spec
Hi Editors, All,
Speaking of ED boilerplate data ... do we want to try to get some
consistency regarding boilerplate data in our EDs?
We have quite a bit of variation now. For example Clipboard and others
are toward the more minimalist end of the spectrum:
Hi Michael, All,
Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this
email was accidentally moved to my Back Burner folder where I just
noticed it)!
Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update
their documents accordingly, are there any specs that
On 9/2/14 9:10 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
Sorry. As with showModalDialog() we would really like to make this
feature disappear. I realize this makes some forms of code
generation
harder, but hopefully you can find a way around that in time.
Perhaps we should
On 9/3/14 8:25 AM, Robert Hanson wrote:
That I think what is unclear from the writing of the warning are two
things:
Per the specs' Participate boilerplate, perhaps you should file a bug
(^1).
-Thanks, AB
^1
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebAppsWGcomponent=XHR
WebApps received a Request for Comments re DAPWG's August 28 Last Call
WD of Battery Status API (last published as a [CR], see [Diff]):
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-battery-status-20140828/
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback.
If anyone in WebApps wants to
On 8/27/14 7:33 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/27/14, 4:50 PM, Daniel Appelquist wrote:
with a few minimal editorial changes.
What are the changes, specifically?
The following service indicates only the boilerplate (start of doc
through the Status of the Document section) plus a change in
/public-sysapps/2014Jun/0014.html.
-Thanks, AB
Original Message
Subject:RE: Update on Streams API Status
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:57:05 +
From: Paul Cotton paul.cot...@microsoft.com
To: Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@gmail.com) art.bars...@gmail.com,
Charles McCathie
[ Bcc: www-tag, public-script-coord, public-web-security,
public-web-mobile ; please Reply-to: public-webapps ]
Hi All,
Marcos and Mounir, the Editors of WebApps' Screen Orientation API,
consider their spec feature complete with only a few minor [Bugs] open.
As such, we seek wide review on
Editors - please see Yves' e-mail re RFC2616 replacement and update your
spec(s) accordingly. -Thanks, AB
Original Message
Subject: RFC723x (replace RFC2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
HTTP/1.1)
Resent-Date:Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:19:52 +
Resent-From:
[ Bcc: public-pointer-events ]
On 7/8/14 6:50 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
... to continue the energy of the Extensible Web Summit in San
Francisco [1], W3C is helping to organize the Extensible Web Summit on
September 11, 2014, in Berlin, Germany.
The summit is designed to bring in platform
FYI, if you are interested in some status of Streams, here's some info
from Domenic:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Jun/0014.html
On 6/25/14 11:58 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
In the case of WebIDL, my personal preference would be to not spend
precious effort on WebIDL 1 CR, but instead to:
(1) publish WebIDL 1 CR as a WG Note without attempting to resolve
outstanding issues, other than by clearly annotating the existence of
On 6/23/14 4:04 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
What is the plan, i.e., schedule timeline, for moving WebIDL to REC?
We have now a two year old CR that appears to be stuck and a 2nd
Edition that I'm not sure has made it to FPWD.
Hi Glenn, All,
I don't have any new info re v1 beyond what Boris said a
FYI.
Original Message
Subject:Fwd: [Webpush] Proposed charter
Resent-Date:Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:37:30 +
Resent-From:www-...@w3.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:37:24 +0100
From: Daniel Appelquist appelqu...@gmail.com
To: TAG List www-...@w3.org
FYI -
This is a PSA regarding the publication of a LCWD of the Beacon API:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-beacon-20140624/
WebApps wasn't specifically asked to review the LCWD but I wanted to
mention it since this spec was previously discussed in this group. If
you have any comments, please send
WebApps has been asked to review three LCWDs published by DAPWG:
* HTML Media Capture -
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-html-media-capture-20140619/
* Ambient Light Events -
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ambient-light-20140619/
* Vibration API -
Below is an request for comments for OASIS' Advanced Message Queuing
Protocol (AMQP) WebSocket Binding (WSB) Version 1.0 Community
Specification Draft:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp-bindmap/amqp-wsb/v1.0/csprd01/amqp-wsb-v1.0-csprd01.html
If you have any comments, please submit them by July
Registration is now open for the October 27-31 Technical Plenary and all
Working Group meeting week:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/
WebApps will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 27 and 28).
Registration for WebApps' meeting (as well as any other meetings and
events that
-
-Doug
On 5/14/14 8:54 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 4/25/14 8:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Art–
There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete
implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annotator [1].
https
On 5/28/14 10:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Bcc: public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom ]
As previously discussed, Gary and Travis have moved the D3E event key
and codes from the D3E and UI Events specs to the following new specs:
FYI, these three docs were published today:
http://www.w3
On 6/9/14 12:09 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
I think it might be best to flip the regular bit to off for now,
and only use this time slot when we have other participants. Thus,
consider the weekly call cancelled unless there's an announcement
otherwise.
That sounds like a good plan Dimitri.
This is a heads-up that Hayato-san created a draft WD of Shadow DOM and
the plan is to publish it on June 12:
https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/
If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us
know by June 9 at the latest.
On 6/6/14 8:39 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
I am a big fan of the giant warning at the bottom of the document.
Will it be maintained in the published version? That would be ideal.
My current plan is to submit the document for publication `as is`. That
said, I do think a small part of the
On 6/4/14 10:41 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/WorkMode#Meetings.3F_What_Meetings.3F
I just added an important point to the above doc related to decisions at
meetings. This point is a c--p of the following text in the group's
charter:
[[
http://www.w3.org
On 6/5/14 1:42 PM, Ben Peters wrote:
From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com]
Can this be an attribute on elements instead? Otherwise, browsers would
have to repeatedly call these functions to update edit menu, etc...
This may be an issue, I agree. But since it's dynamic and changes every
Hi All,
Yesterday I received a request to hold a spec-specific distributed
meeting, with the expectation the meeting would use the #webapps IRC
channel as well as the Consortium's voice conference system. Although I
fully support this proposal, and encourage all Editors and active
On 6/4/14 11:42 AM, Ben Peters wrote:
There will be a conference call on June 6th at 08:00 (8am) San
Francisco time (PST) to discuss the recent editing topics
contentEditable=minimal and CommandEvent[1]. We will be on #webapps
with Zakim and will send minutes to this list. The pin and further
Hi Piotr, All,
This is a reminder the W3C's Patent Policy has a goal of assuring W3C
Recommendations can be implemented Royalty-Free and this requires all
spec contributions include a commitment to that policy. This topic was
last discussed in September 2013 and I encourage all Contributors
On 6/2/14 11:28 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Julian Ladbury
julian.ladb...@berrick-computing.co.uk
mailto:julian.ladb...@berrick-computing.co.uk wrote:
I fail to understand why work on this API has been suspended.
Just to be clear, by “this API” I think you
All,
This is a Request for Comments for the June 3 Encoding specification
that WebApps was asked to review:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-encoding-20140603/
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback.
If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official group
[ Bcc public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom]
Two bugs were raised against the May 1 LCWD of DOM Parsing and
Serialization [LC]. Travis created a tracking document for these Bugs
[Track] and considers the two patches ([P1] and [P2]) that address the
comments as non-substantive. As such, he
On 5/21/14 10:47 AM, Brian Kardell wrote:
I've kind of thought of Web Platform Docs as the developer end of
things and w3c specs for implementers and wgs - is it possible to set
something up under that banner?
Perhaps; I haven't followed WPD so if anyone has data about its actual
usage
On 5/14/14 2:46 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
NOTE: in the absence of any non-resolvable feedback, this proposal
will carry i.e. [3] will be updated to include this joint spec.
FYI, this has been done.
(I also explicitly added the Selection API and made a couple of
additional edits based
Hi All,
About two years ago I proposed in [1] creating a new list (f.ex.
public-webapps-devs) that is targeted toward developers using WebApps'
specs. Such a list would be used by developers using the APIs (as
opposed to implementers) as well as other related purposes such as
announcing
On 5/21/14 7:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Developers seem to complain about us using mailing lists to
communicate rather than GitHub or some other centralized platform that
is not email. Might be worth checking with them first.
Yes, good point Anne. I tweeted this Q with some tags that were
[ Bcc www-tag ; Marc - please use public-webapps for IDB discussions ]
On 5/20/14 7:46 PM, marc fawzi wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been using IndexedDB for a week or so and I've noticed that
cursor.advance(n) will always move n items forward regardless of
cursor direction. In other words, when
On 5/21/14 11:17 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
I've been in several discussions on this topic over the past months, a
good example of which is:
https://twitter.com/tobie/status/457075677851037696
In reaction to that, I'm running an experiment to hold such
discussions in a manner that may prove
The minutes from the May 20 Web Components call are available at the
following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2014/05/20-webapps-minutes.html
If anyone has any corrections, please reply to this e-mail.
-Thanks, ArtB
W3C http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WebApps / Web Components
20
On 4/25/14 8:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Art–
There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete
implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annotator [1].
https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/
OK, so
Hi Martin, Doug,
I noticed there are two drafts related to push protocol:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-http2-00
http://dougt.github.io/webpush-protocol/draft-turner-webpush.html
What are the plans and expectations for these specs (f.ex. do they
address different use case
The First Public Working Draft of Service Workers was published today:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-service-workers-20140508/
Congrats Jungkee and Alex and thanks to Philippe for preparing the `pub
ready` version.
-AB
On 5/5/14 12:51 PM, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote:
Push API draft has been migrated to the W3C GitHub repo:
https://github.com/w3c/push-api
And this means the ED is now https://w3c.github.io/push-api/index.html.
[ Bcc: public-webapps and public-html-admin; please Reply-to: www-dom ]
WebApps requests comments on the May 1 Last Call Working Draft of DOM
Parsing and Serialization (DOMParser, XMLSerializer, innerHTML, and
similar APIs):
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-DOM-Parsing-20140501/
If you have
On 5/1/14 5:13 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I'm not, however, opposed to others having such conference calls as long as
minutes/summary of discussions are posted on the mailing list.
The expectation is the meeting will be announced at least 24 hours in
advance and that minutes will be taken in
On 4/30/14 3:25 AM, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote:
We developing the new version at [1], though not yet updated with the changes
in my previous email.
But if may be a good idea to migrate is to the W3C GitHub official repo.
Hi Eduardo,
WebApps already has a few specs using github.org/W3C so
On 4/30/14 10:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
I'll work with Mike/Robin to create a new push-api project, unless
you request otherwise. OK?
Eduardo - Mike created this project https://github.com/w3c/push-api.
Hi All,
The Tracking Protection WG asked WebApps to review their April 24 LCWD
of Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) so this is a Request for Comments:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-tracking-dnt-20140424/
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback.
If anyone in
Hi All,
In addition to what Chaals said below, when folks meet to discuss
WebApps' specs, please do use the #webapps channel to record the
discussion (log is at [1]).
There are a number of cheat sheets re the IRC bots (f.ex. [2]) so
please do use those bots and if desired, we can easily
On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Art–
There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete
implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annotator [1].
https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/
OK, so at this point, I think it would be helpful if you
As discussed a few weeks ago, public-webapps-testsuite is now closed and
all previous subscribers have been unsubscribed.
For all testing related discussions specific to WebApps, please use the
public-webapps list and infrastructure type discussions, please use the
public-test-infra list.
Are there any objections? If not, we will be moving some bugs over (in
case you're tracking them).
Ben - thanks for the heads-up. I think you should go ahead and move them.
-Thanks, AB
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ben Peters ben.pet...@microsoft.comwrote:
The Selection API Bugzilla
On 4/18/14 10:53 AM, ext Xiaoqian Cindy Wu wrote:
on 18/04/2014 02:59, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On April 17, 2014 at 12:21:06 PM, Arthur Barstow
(art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote:
I also noticed: the REC
has a link to an ED
that now 404s and the
errata doc has a link to a differences document
Travis has now closed the last open bug [1] for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
the spec, using the following ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/innerhtml/raw-file/tip/index.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to
On 4/17/14 12:09 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On April 17, 2014 at 5:46:17 AM, Wang, Peter H (peter.h.w...@intel.com) wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve found a small error in document http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/. In “7.12.4 Example
of Usage”:
古老瓷地图
Ancient Chinese Maps
should be
古老中国地图
Ancient
On 4/4/14 3:29 PM, ext Lars Knudsen wrote:
what happened to the initiative to take a holistic view on
DeviceOrientation, Media Queries and orientation lock all together?
Hi Lars,
Based on the minutes from today's Web Mobile meeting [1], it appears you
and others have found a venue to discuss
On 4/10/14 11:41 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I've uploaded the first cut the selection API specification unofficial draft at
https://github.com/rniwa/selection-api
Wow, that was quick; thanks!
To facilitate review, I think it would be helpful if you would please
create a `directly readable`
Alex and Jungkee propose WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of
Service Workers and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the
following Editor's Draft as the basis:
http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to
Thanks for this information Bryan! Yesterday, Jungkee and Wonsuk said
they would like to discuss Push API during today's meeting and suggested
a good time slot would be after the Service Worker slot (which is
13:30-14:30). Can you join via Zakim at 14:30(+) today? I've tentatively
updated the
testing info in PubStatus for DOM PS spec
[recorded inhttp://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webapps-minutes.html#action01]
trackbot Created ACTION-714 - Update testing info in pubstatus for dom
ps spec [on Arthur Barstow - due 2014-04-17].
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues?labels
On 4/7/14 5:33 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, at 8:37, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On March 20, 2014 at 2:30:55 PM, Marcos Caceres (w...@marcosc.com) wrote:
On March 20, 2014 at 12:58:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Agreed. The exact target
On 4/8/14 2:22 PM, ext Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
So - regarding the
short status, plans, expectations and such for your spec(s).
Some details are still being discussed with implementors (special thanks to Ben
Peters at Microsoft for bringing up issues recently). In particular, it's still
On 4/9/14 10:19 AM, ext Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote:
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
* IDB: Zhiqiang; test suite status; plan to create an Implementation Report
I've reviewed the open pull requests and moved all tests into
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master
On 4/9/14 1:06 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 4/9/14 11:19 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote:
On 04/09/2014 09:10 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
My recollection is that during the TPAC2013 meeting, Jonas said that
functionality was implemented so yes, it would be good if someone
would please
clarify
TL;DR: April 21 is the deadline for comments for LC#2 of a revised
Technical Reports (TR) process
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html. If you have
any comments about LC#2 itself, please send them to the public-w3process
list
James identified tests that aren't producing consistent results
http://hoppipolla.co.uk/410/unstable.txt. For WebApps, the test suites
indentified are: eventsource, workers, websockets, webmessaging and
webstorage. Please review these tests and if needed, create an issue
and/or submit a fix.
On 4/3/14 11:24 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On April 3, 2014 at 4:38:41 PM, Mounir Lamouri (mou...@lamouri.fr) wrote:
Test suite:
None yet. No test suite coordinator at the moment.
I can create the test suite.
Thanks Marcos! (I just added you as the Test Facilitator for this spec.)
On 4/3/14 4:38 PM, ext Vincent Scheib wrote:
Thanks for this information Vincent!
Additional specification discussion:
Artillery started a discussion Problems with mouse-edge scrolling and
games in public-webapps Feb 21 2014 raising the topic of limiting
pointer movement to a rectangular
On 4/3/14 11:29 AM, ext Ted Mielczarek wrote:
Implementation status:
Thanks for this information Ted!
Re testing, are you and/or Scott going to submit tests? If not, is there
someone else that can help/lead the testing effort?
Plan for last call status:
I think we'd consider the spec
[ Bcc: public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom ]
On 4/3/14 5:50 PM, ext Travis Leithead wrote:
* DOM PS: Travis; plan and expectations to get the spec back to LC
I finished the last of the bugs today. It's now ready to head back to LC and
then on to CR!
Anne, All - Travis has now closed
On 4/3/14 2:07 PM, ext Ted Mielczarek wrote:
Trying to design an API that's everything to everyone is extremely
hard and likely to produce unsatisfactory results. We chose to focus
on the most useful subset of things that are common to all
controllers. I believe the API we've spec'ed is useful
On 4/4/14 10:19 AM, ext Ted Mielczarek wrote:
Having a wiki to document v.next work would be great, I know we have a
few things to put on there right away. If you can put up a skeleton
page I'd be happy to fill it out with what I see as topics for v.next.
I just created the skeleton doc
On 4/2/14 4:17 PM, ext Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:50 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
File API; led by Jonas (will Arun join remotely?); which high
priority bugs need discussion; status of LC processing; next steps
If a dial
Hi All,
The [Agenda] page for the April 10-11 meeting includes a list of
Potential Topics and other than a meeting with some members of SysApps
on April 10 to discuss the Service Worker and Manifest specs, currently,
all other time slots are unallocated.
Although we will allocate time slots
Hi All,
The people in the To: list are spec Editors that are not registered for
WebApps' April 10-11 meeting. Since you _won't_ attend the meeting, I
would appreciate it if you would please provide a short status, plans,
expectations and such for your spec(s). In general: what are the major
[ Bcc: public-webapps-testsuite ]
Hi All,
WebApps currently has 7 specs in CR, and 4 of them have at least one
Draft implementation report [Interop]. In preparation for the upcoming
meeting, I would appreciate if by April 9 the Test Facilitators these
CRs would please provide a short status,
public-webapps@w3.org
To: art.bars...@nokia.com
ACTION-713: If systeam can autoforward p-w-testsuite to p-test-infra, close
p-w-ts (Web Applications Working Group)
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/713
On: Arthur Barstow
Due: 2014-04-08
If you do not want to be notified on new
On 4/2/14 12:36 PM, ext Eric U wrote:
Status:
The specs are clearly dead; it's just been way down on my
priority list to do anything about it. We should funnel it off to be
a Note [or whatever the proper procedure is--Art?].
Thanks for the quick reply Eric. When a group agrees to stop
Per Eric's e-mail earlier today [1], this is a Call for Consensus for
WebApps to stop work on the File API Writer and File API: Directories
and System specs and to publish a WG Note for these two specs.
If this CfC passes, I propose removing the technical content of the
Notes (like we did
On 3/30/14 8:02 PM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
I think the related testing efforts [1] (the current status [2]) from
many industry players (of course Anne contributed enormous part of the
test too) are improving the Web in a way.
Yes, I agree, and thanks to all that contribute to this effort.
[ Bcc public-pointer-events ]
On 3/28/14 6:28 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
If you fix a bug, please post a link to the commit in the bug for ease
of review and historical record.
Yes, I agree that is a best practice we should all follow.
I added this one point related to Editor roles and
On 3/28/14 1:09 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Sorry. It's a copy paste error. It currently links to
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-04-Agenda.
Oh, ok; fixed; thanks!
WebApps' agenda page is https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/April2014Meeting.
And a Reminder, Reminder today @ midnight
describing if I had s/2004/2014/).
On Mar 14, 2014, at 4:16 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Original Message
Subject:[admin] Please register for WebApps 10-11 April 2014 f2f
meeting; deadline March 28
Resent-Date:Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:51:50 +
Resent-From
WebApps was asked to review the Last Call Working Draft of the Web
Crypto API:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-WebCryptoAPI-20140325/
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback.
If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please do
so ASAP, in reply
Editors - Robin created a new online pub rules checker that is now in
alpha http://pubrules.jit.su/.
If you have any comments about this service, please send them to
spec-p...@w3.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/.
Original Message
Subject:Early
On 3/14/14 3:21 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Mar 14, 2014, at 5:58 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
I think the selection API is ready for recommendation track work. It's
mostly interoperable between non-Gecko browsers.
One factor to consider re WebApps formally working
201 - 300 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
