On 3/16/14 9:57 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
[Draft]
http://www.w3.org/2012/webapps/charter/Overview.html#deliverables
That should be:
[Draft] http://afbarstow.github.io/WebApps/charter.html#deliverables
Original Message
Subject: [admin] Please register for WebApps 10-11 April 2014 f2f
meeting; deadline March 28
Resent-Date:Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:51:50 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:50:41 -0500
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars
On 3/13/14 7:43 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Hi,
It appears that there is a lot of new features such as CSS regions and shadow
DOM that have significant implications on selection API, and we really need a
spec. for selection API these specifications can refer to.
Thankfully, Aryeh has done a
On 3/11/14 5:45 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote:
FYI. For those not used to Blink's process, that doesn't mean the
feature is planning to ship yet but Google is working on this. The API
we are aiming for is a bit different from what the specification
currently describes as mentioned in the original
Hi Bryan, Eduardo, All,
While working through the push notification versus push message
thread, I noticed Push API directly refers to System Messages as
defined by SysApps' [runtime] spec. Based on the Note at the top of
[runtime], it appears work on that spec has stopped. As such, what is
On 3/13/14 1:52 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote:
System Messages are definitely abandoned, I do not think any
specification should use them. Even in SysApps, we started working on
something called Event Pages (similar to what Chrome Apps does) before
Service Worker took off.
Given this, seems
On 3/12/14 10:27 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
SGTM
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Yves Lafon yla...@w3.org
mailto:yla...@w3.org wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
[[
strongWork on this document
On 2/19/14 7:09 PM, ext Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
Seems like our specs are getting a little behind implementations. In IE11 we
are finding that several new sites, notably those using WebGL content, have a
On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
What do you recommend?
It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about
putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTML
and no longer has normative weight.
I
On 1/21/14 3:36 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Although WebApps' current charter [Charter] does not expire until the
end of May, since it can take a while to agree on a new charter
(especially if new deliverables are proposed), I created a Draft
[Draft] today. A diff of the current charter vs
Hallvord is working toward publishing a new WD of Clipboard API and
Events on (or around) March 11, based on [ED].
If you have any comments about this proposal, please reply to this
thread by March 7 at the latest.
-Thanks, AB
[ED]
Hajime proposes WebApps publish a new WD of HTML Imports on March 6,
based on [ED].
If you have any comments about this proposal, please reply to this
thread by March 3 at the latest.
-Thanks, AB
[ED]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/imports/index.html
On 2/26/14 9:43 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All,
Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I
think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be
replaced with a WG Note that clearly indicates WebApps' work on the
standalone spec has
, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On 2/26/14 9:43 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All,
Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid
confusion, I think WebApps' last TR
Yarco - WebApps is no longer working on the HTML Templates spec. That
feature was moved to [HTML5] and that spec says feedback should be sent
to public-html-comments @ w3.org.
-Regards, ArtB
[HTML5] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
On 2/19/14 5:24 AM, ext Yarco Wang wrote:
Hello, Guys:
there?
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All,
Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I
think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced
with a WG Note that clearly indicates WebApps' work on the standalone
spec has stopped and the feature is now part of HTML5.
On 2/13/14 5:00 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
As promised, here's the plans and expectations summary for the Web
Components spec umbrella. Apologies for taking so long.
Thanks for this information Dimitri! (I just updated the Plans column of
[PubStatus] accordingly.)
To the extent WebApps
On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was
merged to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML,
which might raise the question did HTML do something different than
what this spec used to say?).
Yes, I agree
On 2/21/14 1:33 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
## Recommendations to implementers/W3C
From our findings, this is what we would recommend implementers and the W3C
consider when standardizing this technology.
* It has to be possible for users to follow hyperlinks in standalone
applications. Even
On 2/17/14 9:17 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
The only process requirement for a FPWD is that the group record
consensus to publish it. However, it's usually helpful if the FPWD
On 2/17/14 6:47 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
I personally would like to see it become an official draft of the
Working Group if it isn't already
Yes, me too.
(the Publication Status page implies not,
On 2/17/14 8:03 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
BTW, I noticed there is no Bugzilla component for Service
Workers so I will ask Mike Smith to create one).
I think they bug tracker on GH is being used instead. It's already very
or propose them on the list:
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/April2014Meeting
Thanks to Daniel Austin and eBay for hosting the meeting!
-AB
On 2/11/14 7:49 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All - as mentioned last month, we are organizing a f2f meeting for
this coming Spring and the dates are April
[ Bcc public-webapps-testuite ]
Thanks to Dom and Tobie, [w-p-t] PRs are automatically tagged with WG
identifiers (pattern is wg-WGname f.ex. wg-webapps). This means
there is an easy way to get a list of the open PRs for WebApp's tests:
Congratulations to Anne, Jungkee and Chaals on the publication of a
Progress Events Recommendation
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-progress-events-20140211/ .
(I updated this spec's PubStatus data to state that no additional work
is planned and that the feature is now part of XHR.)
Hi All - as mentioned last month, we are organizing a f2f meeting for
this coming Spring and the dates are April 10-11 in San Jose CA US.
WebApps' Thurs/Friday meeting will follow an April 8-9 meeting of the
HTMLWG at the same location.
If April 10-11 causes any major and non-resolvable
This is a Request for Comments for the Device API WG's February 11 LCWD
of the Vibration API:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-vibration-20140211/
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback.
If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please do
so
On 2/6/14 9:06 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Could chairs of the working group please clarify whether we have had a reach of
consensus on the default encapsulation level in shadow DOM?
As described in [WorkMode], WebApps' asynchronous participation and edit
first work modes means group members
In case anyone missed it, yesterday Opera announced they released their
Presto test suite to Github:
https://github.com/operasoftware/presto-testo/tree/master/core/standards
Thanks Opera!
Although they previously submitted several test suites for WebApps'
specs, it appears there are some new
On 2/6/14 11:31 PM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
After meeting with the WHATWG folks and discussing the various scenarios being
targeted by the Streams specs as well as other considerations, we all agreed
that we have the same goals and should work together to get alignment and avoid
having
On 1/31/14 10:21 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
* Do we want to continue both efforts (and thus reflect this in the
charter update)?
Given the feedback on this thread, I don't think there is consensus to
only focus on one API so I added the Mozilla FileSystem API spec to the
set of File
On 2/5/14 12:00 AM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Hi,
Apparently there has been discussions about hats and cats selector combinators
in www-style:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0032.html
In that Tab (Atkins) from Google made a comment saying that Chrome will be
shipping
On 1/31/14 10:44 AM, ext Ian Clelland wrote:
Hi Art,
For what it's worth, theFile API: Directories and System is also
implemented (and supported) by Apache Cordova[1]. The implementation
is essentially complete for mobile applications on Android, iOS and
FireOS, with nearly-complete support
FYI, Mark's URI Design and Ownership Internet Draft (aka URI, Get Off
My Lawn) is now a Last Call Working Draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-01.
Please read the doc, especially the `Best Current Practices for
Standardising Structured URIs` section if your
Hi Eric, Arun, Jonas, All,
During the review of the first draft of WebApps' proposed charter
extension, Marcos raised (indirectly) a question [1] about the plan for
WebApps' various file system APIs and I agreed to followup.
We have the two specs that Eric edits:
* File API: Writer
On 1/27/14 11:41 PM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
Thanks for all the comments. I've updated the WD of XMLHttpRequest
Level 1 as such:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/xhr-1/TR/Overview.html
FYI, the new WD was published earlier today
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20140130/.
Hi All - just a heads-up the TAG has started to review the Quota API:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/21
Thanks Domenic! Looking forward to the feedback.
-AB
Hi All,
In case folks missed it, on January 16, Hiroki Nakagawa submitted an
Intent to Implement and Ship Quota Management API (unprefixed) e-mail
to the [blink-dev] list.
If anyone has implementation/ship data for Firefox, IE, WebKit, etc.,
please let us know.
-Thanks, AB
[blink-dev]
On 1/27/14 10:48 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
I'm wondering if we can change the group's work mode to not requiring CFCs for
ordinary working drafts? Unless I'm not getting something, they seem to add an
unnecessary delay to getting stuff published.
Hi Marcos,
Strictly speaking there is no
On 1/23/14 8:48 PM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
I understand your concern. Indeed, we editors should have made it
clearer providing updates on the status and more importantly a new TR.
The goal of the snapshot version of the spec is clear. It aims to
standardize all widely implemented parts of
Hi All,
Although WebApps' current charter [Charter] does not expire until the
end of May, since it can take a while to agree on a new charter
(especially if new deliverables are proposed), I created a Draft [Draft]
today. A diff of the current charter vs. the draft is available at [Diff].
Congratulations Anne on today's publication of the CORS Recommendation!
Thanks to you, all of the contributors [1] and to WebAppSec for pushing
this through.
-Cheers, ArtB
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-cors-20140116/#acknowledgments
On 1/16/14 11:57 AM, ext Coralie Mercier wrote:
It is
FYI. (If you want to followup, please reply on www-tag @ w3.org)
Original Message
Subject:Guidance on the usage of promises for API developers
Resent-Date:Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:50:19 +
Resent-From:www-...@w3.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:49:30 +
From:
bugs as DUPs (and
include a reference to the associated Issue).
-Thanks, ArtB
[1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Submitting_tests
[Issue-474] https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/474
[Bugz] http://tinyurl.com/WebApps-testing-Bugz
On 12/19/13 9:54 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Bcc
Original Message
Subject: RfC: LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline 7 January
2014
Resent-Date:Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:30:47 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:21:07 -0500
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Mihai - your e-mail fails the respectful manner requirement of the
group's e-mail policy (see [1]).
Please restrict the content of your e-mails to respectful technical
comments.
If you continue to fail to abide with this policy, your posting rights
to this list will be removed.
-Thanks,
On 12/16/13 12:53 PM, ext James Graham wrote:
On 16/12/13 16:43, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 12/16/13 11:20 AM, ext James Graham wrote:
On 12/12/13 16:20, James Graham wrote:
On 12/12/13 15:13, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/11/13 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[IR] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps
[ Bcc: public-webapps-testsuite ]
Hi All,
I think it would be helpful if WebApps had a common way to manage test
case bugs, in particular:
1. A common way to report a test bug
2. An easy way to determine if a specific test suite has any open bugs.
(For example, if someone goes to the
[ Bcc public-webapps-testsuite ]
Hi All,
On December 17 a Candidate Recommendation of Pointer Lock was published
and that triggered a Call for Implementations:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-pointerlock-20131217/
Congratulations to Vincent (who also agreed to be the spec's Test
On 12/2/13 3:30 PM, ext Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On Dec 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Since this CfC was started, Arun reopened [23853] on November 28 and [23946]
was filed on November 30.
Arun - what's the plan here vis-à-vis this CfC?
-Thanks, ArtB
[23853] https://www.w3.org
On 12/16/13 11:20 AM, ext James Graham wrote:
On 12/12/13 16:20, James Graham wrote:
On 12/12/13 15:13, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/11/13 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[IR] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers
Looking at this link, there are passes marked for obviously
One of the discussion topics for the TAG's December 19 call [Agenda] is
the Push API [ED]. Members of the TAG have assembled comments in:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/blob/master/2013/08/Push_API_initial_comments.md
As well as the following thread:
On 12/12/13 7:31 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:42:15 +0100, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
The first Call for workers Test Results was sent over a half-year ago
and another one a few weeks before WebApps' Shenzhen meeting. Despite
those requests, the workers
On 12/11/13 6:39 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:09:38 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
We at Mozilla just finished our implementation of Shared Workers. It
will be turned on in the nightly releases starting tomorrow (or maybe
thursday) and will hit release on
On 12/10/13 10:21 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Coralie Mercier cora...@w3.org wrote:
- DOM Parsing and Serialization
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Parsing/),
There were several outstanding comments against publishing and the WG
published anyway? What is
This is a Request for Comments for the Last Call Working Draft of DOM
Parsing and Serialization:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-DOM-Parsing-20131210/
If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps @ w3.org by
7 January 2014.
The bugs for this spec are [Bugs].
-Thanks, AB
On 12/6/13 3:28 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org
mailto:a...@chromium.org wrote:
1. The parser does not know that it needs to use MyElement.@@create
to create the JS objects when it sees a my-element.
2. No callbacks for enteredView,
On 12/6/13 2:04 PM, ext James Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Both Travis and I supported keeping that information in the
boilerplate. The W3C Staff told us it must be removed before the
LC
[ s/public-webapps-testsuite/public-webapps/ Uuugh ]
On 12/7/13 10:22 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
[ + IanJ; Bcc public-w3process since this thread is an instance of issue-71; (see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public
On 12/6/13 7:40 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
On 11/26/2013 08:43 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Earlier today Travis closed the last open bug for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
that spec, using the following ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg
Takayoshi would like to publish a new Working Draft of Input Method
Editor API. This is a Call for Consensus to do so using the following
document as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/default/TR4.html
Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new
On 12/4/13 3:53 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Thanks for the update Feras.
Re getting `wide review` of the latest [ED], which groups, lists and
individuals should be asked to review the spec?
In IRC just now, jgraham
On 12/3/13 11:46 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
I don't have any objections to waiting for the folks to catch up.
We'll just keep it in LC until next year.
Given the feedback on this thread, I don't think we have broad consensus
to move Custom Elements to CR so I support Dimitri's proposal.
Thanks for the update Feras.
Re getting `wide review` of the latest [ED], which groups, lists and
individuals should be asked to review the spec?
In IRC just now, jgraham mentioned TC39, WHATWG and Domenic. Would
someone please ask these two groups to review the latest ED?
Aymeric - would
No comments or bugs were submitted against the 31 October LCWD of
Pointer Lock. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a
Candidate Recommendation of the spec using the LCWD as the basis:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerlock-20131031/
This CfC satisfies: a) the group's
Because of the upcoming EoY publication `black out`, December 7 is the
last day to start a 1-week CfC to publish a document in 2013. As such,
if you want a spec published in December (December 17 is the last
publication date of the year), please speak up as soon as possible.
-Thanks, ArtB
Hi All,
Although it appears the Technical Plenary and all WG meeting week for
2014 is not formally scheduled, it is my understanding it will be in the
Silicon Valley area at the end of October or early November. My
recommendation (based on what I know now) is that WebApps should plan to
Marcos proposed in [1] that WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft
(FPWD) of Manifest for web apps and bookmarks and this is a Call for
Consensus to do so, using the following document as the basis for the FPWD:
http://w3c.github.io/manifest/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement
On 11/21/13 1:44 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All,
Arun completed processing the comments [Comments] for the Last Call
version of File API [LCWD]. Although the comments resulted in changes
to the spec (see [Diff]), no new features were added and the changes
are considered bug fixes. The most
Hi Vincent, All,
I didn't notice any comments or bugs. Did I miss anything? If not, I'll
start a CfC to publish a Candidate Recommendation.
-Thanks, AB
On 10/31/13 3:32 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
This is a Request for Comments for the Last Call Working Draft of
Pointer Lock:
http
On 11/27/13 7:17 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant technical
requirements (e.g
On 11/27/13 8:52 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
WebApps has a relatively long history of giving Editors quite a bit of
artistic freedom aka edit-first-review-later policy so I don't see what
Travis has done
On 11/26/13 1:45 AM, ext Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote:
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 2:58 AM
Please contact me if you can commit to helping with this effort and you
have `relevant` experience.
After reconsidering your invitation at TPAC about
updates
to the ED in-flight, and I want to make sure we base the CfC on the right ED
content :-)
Hopefully this is workable to the group. Thanks!
-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 4:00 AM
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD
Earlier today Travis closed the last open bug for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
that spec, using the following ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/innerhtml/raw-file/tip/index.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to
Original Message
Subject:RfC: LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline November 28
Resent-Date:Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:36:52 +
Resent-From:public-webapps@w3.org
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:32:49 -0400
From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
To: public-webapps
sysbot+trac...@w3.org
Reply-To: Web Applications Working Group public-webapps@w3.org
To: art.bars...@nokia.com
ACTION-704: Find another test facilitator for idb spec (Web Applications
Working Group)
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/704
On: Arthur Barstow
Due: 2013-11-19
Hi All,
Arun completed processing the comments [Comments] for the Last Call
version of File API [LCWD]. Although the comments resulted in changes to
the spec (see [Diff]), no new features were added and the changes are
considered bug fixes. The most significant change is the Constructor
APIs
: Start a cfc to publish lcwd of dom parsing and serialization (Web
Applications Working Group)
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/701
On: Arthur Barstow
Due: 2013-11-18
If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please
update your settings at:
http://www.w3.org
Hi Dimitri, Dominic,
Ryosuke is here in Shezhen at WebApps' f2f meeting. We would like to
have one or both of you join us (via voice conference) on Tuesday
morning to talk about Web Components and his comments below.
Please look at the agenda page and let us know your availability for the
. I am especially interested in
whether or not you consider any of the bug fixes you applied as
substantive and/or add a new feature (which would require a new LC).
-Thanks, ArtB
[1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/LCWD-FileAPI-20130912
On 9/12/13 10:39 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ Bcc
On 11/1/13 8:52 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 10/31/13 11:52 PM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
Agreed. Some of the points listed appear to be things already
addressed. Takeshi and I have some feedback on the initial mail, but
will wait and provide thoughts on the proposal instead. Looking
Hi Aymeric,
On 10/29/13 7:22 AM, ext Aymeric Vitte wrote:
Who is coordinating each group that should get involved?
I thought you agreed to do that ;).
MediaStream for example should be based on the Stream interface and
all related streams proposals.
More seriously though, this is good to
On 10/31/13 8:51 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
(I'm trying to get a sense if this meeting should be canceled or
perhaps reduced to 30 mins.)
Thanks for the feedback All.
At the moment, it appears Manifest is the only topic of mutual interest
and that further discussion within SysApps (e.g
On 10/31/13 11:52 PM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
Agreed. Some of the points listed appear to be things already addressed.
Takeshi and I have some feedback on the initial mail, but will wait and provide
thoughts on the proposal instead. Looking forward to seeing it.
On 11/1/13 8:32 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ + public-webapps ]
Hi Janina, All,
I added a 30 minute slot on Monday November 11 from 13:30-14:00
(Shenzhen time). Unless I hear otherwise from you, I will assume this
slot is OK and that we will meet in WebApps' meeting room.
To help
, this is new thinking for us, just approved
this week. I'm certain, though, James can have something for us in time
for our meeting.
Janina Sajka, IndieUI Chair
Arthur Barstow writes:
[ + public-webapps ]
Hi Janina, All,
I added a 30 minute slot on Monday November 11 from 13:30-14:00
(Shenzhen
[ My apologies in advance for cross-posting but I think it's needed for
this coordination topic. ]
Hi All,
Last June, the Chairs of WebApps and SysApps agreed to allocate a time
slot @ TPAC Shenzhen for a joint meeting from 16:00-17:00 on Monday
November 11 [1].
The one topic currently
Hi,
For the purposes of tracking your comments for the September 12 File API
Last Call Working Draft, please let us know if Arun's reply is
satisfactory or not. In the absence of a reply from you by November 7,
we will assume Arun's reply is OK with you.
-Thanks, ArtB
On 10/23/13 6:04 PM,
This is a Request for Comments for the Last Call Working Draft of
Pointer Lock:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerlock-20131031/
If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps @ w3.org by
November 28 using a Subject: header of [pointerlock].
-Thanks, AB
A Recommendation of Widget Interface was published today:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-widgets-apis-20131031/
Congratulations Marcos!
This publication means that of WebApps' 7 widget related documents, 5
are now Recommendations and the other 2 are WG Notes. As such, the
group's widget
The Push API Patent Advisory Group published their `report` and it
recommends WebApps continue to work on the spec
http://www.w3.org/2013/10/push-api-pag-report.html.
On 10/30/13 12:53 PM, ext Coralie Mercier wrote:
The Push API Patent Advisory Group (PAG) [1] has published a report
Kinuko has made substantive changes [1] to the Quota Management API
since the FPWD was published. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to
publish a new Working Draft using the ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Agreement to this CfC: a) indicates
Feras and Takeshi have begun merging their Streams proposal and this is
a Call for Consensus to publish a new WD of Streams API using the
updated ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
Please note the Editors may update the ED before the TR is published
Bugzilla bugs for these issues (if applicable).
-Thanks, ArtB
Kenneth
On Oct 25, 2013 5:30 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On 10/2/13 12:31 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Mounir,
If any of the data for the Screen Orientation
On 10/2/13 12:31 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Mounir,
If any of the data for the Screen Orientation API in [PubStatus] is
not accurate, please provide corrections.
Also, if you have any new information re your plans for the spec -
last published 06-Dec-2012 - or the spec's status
[Bcc public-pointer-events ]
Hi All,
The Advisory Board spent the last two years discussing updates to the
Technical Reports process f.ex. to make it less heavy-weight [AB]. The
results are in the following Draft document that is proposed to replace
Chapter 7 of the (current) Process
[Bcc public-pointer-events ]
Hi All,
The Advisory Board spent the last two years discussing updates to the
Technical Reports process f.ex. to make it less heavy-weight [AB]. The
results are in the following Draft document that is proposed to replace
Chapter 7 of the (current) Process
This is a Request for Comments for the Last Call Working Draft of Custom
Elements:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-custom-elements-20131024/
If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps @ w3.org by
November 21 using a Subject: header of [custom-elements]
-Thanks, AB
Travis and Gary would like to publish a new WD of UI Events and this is
a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/d4e/raw-file/tip/source_respec.htm
Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new
WD; and b) does not
301 - 400 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
