Re: File API - Progress - Question about Partial Blob data

Extract Widget Mobile :www.extractwidget.com BlimpMe! :www.blimpme.com -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/

Re: Streams and Blobs

Hi Anne, Le 26/02/2013 17:34, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Hi Anne, Did you mean to reply just to me? No, adding the list. * moz-blob Is this the same as blob specified in the XHR2 draft [1

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Streams API; deadline February 2

/2013JanMar/0149.html -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/

Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API

to receive the exact chunks created by the server (point 2 in my previous email) which the FileReader API doesn't preserve. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http

Re: [File API] About Partial Blob Data, XHR and Streams API

Hi Jonas, Le 1/18/2013 11:14 AM, Jonas Sicking a écrit : On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Hi all, Reading the File API, it is not clear to me what the behavior is when reading partial Blob data. The spec says: Partial Blob data

[Streams API] typo

Hi all, I noticed a typo in the W3C Editor's Draft 25 October 2012 of Streams API (section 2.2): not allow and future reads should be not allow *any* future reads. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46

[File API] About Partial Blob Data

but if it is an ArrayBuffer, since it is immutable, it cannot be incremented. So in the case the final length of the Blob is not known yet (e.g. chunked XHR), result has to be a new object each time. Am I wrong here? If not, could you clarify the spec ? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de

Re: RfC: LCWD of Progress Events; deadline September 1

, please update the ED to reflect a CR publication (e.g. add CR exit criteria you used in rev 1.25) and notify me when you are done so I can start a CfC to publish a CR. I agree. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46

Re: RfC: LCWD of Progress Events; deadline September 1

Le 14/08/2011 14:05, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit : On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD

Re: [XHR] support for streaming data

Hi Charles, Le 10/08/2011 23:19, Charles Pritchard a écrit : On 8/9/2011 1:00 AM, Cyril Concolato wrote: Hi Charles, I believe that GPAC seeks through large SVG files via offsets and small buffers, from what I understood at SVG F2F. http://gpac.wp.institut-telecom.fr/ The technique

Re: RfC: LCWD of Progress Events; deadline September 1

specifications are to define properly the use of these events. Section 4.3: Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it? Regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato

Re: [XHR] support for streaming data

transcoding for SVG fragments but for instance individual gzip encoding is possible. I think an interesting use case for XHR would be to be able to request data with some synchronization, i.e. with a clock reference and timestamp for each response data. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences

Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf

Le 11/02/2010 17:33, Robin Berjon a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Feb 11, 2010, at 14:03 , Arthur Barstow wrote: On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, ext Cyril Concolato wrote: Dear Mr. Barstow, We can do so provided you agree to never again call me Mr. Barstow :-). Yeah, we wouldn't want to anger Mr

Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf

Dear Mr. Barstow, As indicated in the mails about MPEG-U, I would like to request that the WG discusses the MPEG liaison regarding widgets. Could you add it to the agenda ? Best Regards, Cyril Concolato Le 10/02/2010 14:29, Arthur Barstow a écrit : Below is the draft agenda for the 11

Re: [widgets-twi] window object

it in the global object. What's wrong with that? It would easier to specify. What's the benefit of using the window object? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom

Re: [widgets] TWI: comments

Hi Marcos, Le 08/02/2010 16:56, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Cyril Concolato * The spec says: When an object implementing the Widget interface is instantiated, if a user agent has not previously associated a storage area with the instance of a widget, then the user

Re: MPEG-U

Robin, Le 09/02/2010 13:41, Robin Berjon a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:20 , Cyril Concolato wrote: Le 04/02/2010 13:35, Robin Berjon a écrit : It would be a lot simpler if the secretariat would just send an email to this list! I agree with you it would be much simpler

Re: [widgets-twi] window object

was the rationale for having the widget object as an attribute of the window object. Why not put in the global object, this would avoid having to handle it differently in each language? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom

[widgets-twi] window object

be implemented in a UA that does not support the window object ? Best regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/

[widgets] TWI: comments

/ setItem such as in widget.preferences.getItem('foo'); and widget.preferences.setItem('foo', 'dahut'); is allowed or if only the brackets notation (widget.preferences['foo']) is allowed. Maybe by adding an example ? Regards, Cyril [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-apis-20091222/ -- Cyril

Re: MPEG-U

will it be discussed ? Regards, Cyril Le 20/01/2010 17:24, Doug Schepers a écrit : Hi, Cyril- Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/20/10 12:24 AM): Le 13/01/2010 19:59, Doug Schepers a écrit : Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/13/10 10:37 AM): Yes, you're right, the problem is that liaisons usually

Re: MPEG-U

Hi Doug, Le 13/01/2010 19:59, Doug Schepers a écrit : Hi, Cyril- Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/13/10 10:37 AM): Yes, you're right, the problem is that liaisons usually are not considered as public documents so the secretariat or MPEG members are not allowed to make them public. ... Anyway

Re: MPEG-U

Hi Robin, Le 12/01/2010 18:13, Robin Berjon a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Jan 12, 2010, at 17:34 , Cyril Concolato wrote: Le 11/01/2010 15:41, Robin Berjon a écrit : Ah, do you have a pointer? I searched for MPEG-U in all the public and member lists yet only this thread shows up. The liaison

Re: MPEG-U

Hi Robin, Le 11/01/2010 15:41, Robin Berjon a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Jan 7, 2010, at 15:59 , Cyril Concolato wrote: sorry to put you on the spot, but I don't recall this being discussed by WebApps I know that a liaison was sent from MPEG to the W3C early may 2009 and that the WG was informed

Re: MPEG-U

interrogation; can you enlighten us? Thanks! -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/

Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ?

Le 05/01/2010 21:13, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Hi all, There is a test in the test suite for duplicated param element with the same name

Re: [widgets] PC simplifying some rules (editorial)

with the test suite (see next email). So hopefully, I should get close to the 100% in the future. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr

Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?

Le 05/01/2010 23:54, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Hi, The test df.wgt contains a feature without name. In this case, the feature element is ignored and the widget remains valid. The test d4.wgt contains an invalid

Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?

Marcos, Le 06/01/2010 10:52, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Wednesday, January 6, 2010, Cyril Concolatocyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Le 05/01/2010 23:54, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.frwrote: Hi, The test df.wgt contains

Re: [widgets] PC simplifying some rules (editorial)

Le 06/01/2010 11:22, Scott Wilson a écrit : On 6 Jan 2010, at 08:56, Cyril Concolato wrote: [snip] 1 fails because we don't implement SNIFF. I don't know if we will. [snip] Actually you don't need to implement SNIFF to pass that particular test, as it only requires you do the extension

Re: [widgets] white space handling

Hi Robin, Le 18/12/2009 18:01, Robin Berjon a écrit : On Dec 18, 2009, at 16:36 , Cyril Concolato wrote: Le 18/12/2009 15:58, Robin Berjon a écrit : P+C doesn't tie processors to a particular version of XML, and lists its white space characters accordingly (and defensively). If you're

Re: [widgets] white space handling

For space characters, why did you add U+000B and U+000C? I think this question is even more important if you note that XHTML 1 indicates that U+000C is an invalid XML char (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_15) Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe

[widgets] white space handling

indicate that the behavior is the same as the basic XML processing. Best regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/

[widgets] features: default value for required

attribute value to the required attribute. *If the required attribute is not used or *if required-feature is not a valid boolean value, then let the value of required-feature be the value 'true'. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group

[widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?

. Regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/widgets

[widgets] duplicated feature elements ?

-- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/widgets

Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute

-- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/

[widgets] test suite: br.wgt

Hi all, In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because a Widget UA will not be able to display it, the user may see an icon but nothing happening when activating it. WDYT ? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato

Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt

Hi, Le 15/12/2009 18:00, Marcos Caceres a écrit : Hi Cyril On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Hi all, In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because

[widgets] PC simplifying some rules (editorial)

. Couldn't you put all the Rules into one section 9.1 and all the Steps in 9.2? Regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure

Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors

on top of Step 5. Step 5 handles the priority of a localized resource over non localized resource sith the same name. This is not the case here. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept

Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors

to be in the correct order, where locales/en/icon.jpg must be first and icon.png must be second. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des

Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors

Robin, Robin Berjon a écrit : On Dec 9, 2009, at 14:31 , Cyril Concolato wrote: Actually, I have a problem with the way the test suite result are expressed. Since there is no normative algorithm for the selection of the actual displayed icon, why should the test suite results but so strict

[widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute

, not in error, greater than 0, width = the specified value - in error or not specified, width = null, empty or 0. Actually, I would prefer 0 since then the attribute can be implemented as an integer not as a string. What do you think ? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate

Re: [widgets] element-based localization

Hi Marcos, Robin, Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: On Nov 27, 2009, at 20:55 , Marcos Caceres wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: I'm trying to implement the element-based

Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang

Cyril Concolato a écrit : Hi all, I'm trying to understand the difference between two tests: [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/test-suite/test-cases/ta-UEMbyHERkI/000/config.xml [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/test-suite/test-cases/ta-UEMbyHERkI/003/config.xml In [1

[widgets] editing problem

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#rule-for-identifying-the-media-type-of-a0 -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des

[widgets] element-based localization

would also create some tests in the test-suite to check that inheritance is applied and used or not depending on the element type.WDYT? Best regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images

[widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang

] and others en like [2]. Am I wrong? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http

Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt

Hi Marcos, Marcos Caceres a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Hi, The test d1.wgt is about the src attribute of the icon element. It says that it tests the following assertion: If the src attribute of this icon element is absent

Re: [widgets] About the test suite

need to duplicate the tests. If not, we can add the SVG files and use a single test (for most cases). Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale

[widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute

the drawback is that you have to scan your zip file for all files in order. The spec and conformance would be simpler without that, without losing features I think. WDYT? Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du

Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute

Robin Berjon a écrit : Hi Cyril, On Nov 20, 2009, at 17:58 , Cyril Concolato wrote: While implementing the required features to pass the tests of the test suite, I was wondering if you really want to keep the default start file table. The benefit of this table seems to be just avoiding

Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute

Marcos Caceres a écrit : On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote: Hi all, While implementing the required features to pass the tests of the test suite, I was wondering if you really want to keep the default start file table. The benefit of this table

[widgets] about test d1.wgt

to be such test with the content element. If you make such test, you should also align the spec in the same manner. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing

[widgets] About the test suite

Hi all, I was reviewing the overview of the test suite [1] and also the compatibility matrix document [2]. I had two questions. Why do the names of the tests have to be so cryptic (e.g. ta-RRZxvvTFHx, ta-dxzVDWpaWg, ...)? Could you use meaningful names like default-start-file-01,

Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3

Hi Marcos, Marcos Caceres a écrit : Hi Cyril, Thank you for again taking the the time to review the PC spec... comments below. 2009/10/25 Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr: Dear all, I made a review of the current specification [1] and I have some comments. I realize that I'm sending

[widgets] Comments on LCWD #3

regards, Cyril [1] Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration, W3C Working Draft 22 October 2009, http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image

Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again

would only support GET requests. For example, http://theFooEngine/barWidget.wgt/index.html#welcome Kind regards, Marcos -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole