Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-29 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi, Folks- I've put together a wiki page [1] that I propose to send to the AC as a further clarification on the charter discussion. How does this look to you? Does everyone agree that this is fair representation of the changed work in the WebApps WG charter? [1]

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-29 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Folks- I've put together a wiki page [1] that I propose to send to the AC as a further clarification on the charter discussion. How does this look to you? Does everyone agree that this is fair representation of the changed work

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-29 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Folks- I've put together a wiki page [1] that I propose to send to the AC as a further clarification on the charter discussion. How does this look to you? Does everyone agree that this is fair representation of the changed work

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-29 Thread Doug Schepers
Hi, Maciej- I'm a little frustrated to be having this conversation now, after I tried for several weeks to get comments on the charter before sending it to W3M, and then to the AC. There was substantial discussion on both the member-only list and on this public list (which you engaged in),

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-29 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Maciej- I'm a little frustrated to be having this conversation now, after I tried for several weeks to get comments on the charter before sending it to W3M, and then to the AC. There was substantial discussion on both the

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-28 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Maciej, On 26/03/10 3:24 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: Apple has chosen not to participate in Widgets standards work at the W3C. That's not true, Apple has directly influenced and participated in the work: remember [1], and the

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-26 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Maciej, On 26/03/10 3:24 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Mar 25, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Maciej, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:50 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: WARP is a split from P+C, its ancestor is in

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-25 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Maciej, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:50 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: WARP is a split from P+C, its ancestor is in the first draft. Sounds fine to document it that way, since the precursor is not clear from backtracking

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-23 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 23, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: On Mar 23, 2010, at 06:39 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote: Indexed Database API Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving Uniform Messaging Policy Selectors API Level 2 Widgets Access Request Policy Widgets URI Scheme Widgets View Mode I tried to omit

Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-22 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
The following items are not listed as new in the draft charter, although they do not appear in the previous charter and are not an obvious continuation of a previous charter spec: Indexed Database API Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving Uniform Messaging Policy Selectors API Level 2

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

2010-03-22 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Maciej- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 3/22/10 10:36 PM): The following items are not listed as new in the draft charter, although they do not appear in the previous charter and are not an obvious continuation of a previous charter spec: