Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web SQL Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3. Web

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3], Art[4], Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the primary concerns raised are the normative User agents must implement the SQL dialect supported by Sqlite 3.6.19

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3], Art[4], Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the primary concerns raised are the normative User agents must

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3], Art[4], Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the primary

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:46 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web Sockets API and then either publish it as LC (if Adrian agrees) or at least WD. The deadline is 18

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web Sockets API and then either publish it as LC (if Adrian agrees) or at least WD. I think it

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:09 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web Sockets API and then

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web SQL Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3. Web

RE: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-15 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Saturday, December 12, 2009 11:27 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: Charles McCathieNevile wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:46:12 -0800, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the following specs: 1.

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-12 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:46:12 -0800, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web SQL Database

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-12 Thread Arun Ranganathan
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:46:12 -0800, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web SQL Database

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-11 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
Hi Art, This is Oracle's official position on Web SQL Database: Oracle does not believe that Web SQL Database is ready for Last Call. Oracle believes that: 1. It is not good for the industry to start a new SQL language standard track. A better approach would be to define a profile based

Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December

2009-12-11 Thread Jonas Sicking
As always, I should point out that there is no such thing as an official mozilla position. With that out of the way, my feelings are: * I don't think that source code makes a good specification. It's bound to specify things that we'd rather not specify (i.e. bugs in the code), and it'll make it