Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-29 Thread Ina Panova
Voting on PUP-6 ended on August 28. The PUP passed with five +1 and no -1. Tomorrow I will send out an announcement with the link to the adopted and documented process of Commit bit assignment. Thanks all for participating! Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-27 Thread Milan Kovacik
+1 Thanks Ina! milan On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I left some more feedback. The only substantive request is > s/supermajority/two-thirds/ since supermajority can mean several things > per: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority > > Assuming those comments are

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-24 Thread Brian Bouterse
I left some more feedback. The only substantive request is s/supermajority/two-thirds/ since supermajority can mean several things per: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority Assuming those comments are addressed, I'm +1. Thank you so much for putting this together @ipanova! On Fri, Aug 2

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-24 Thread Ina Panova
I tried to address all the comments and updates the PR. Please give another look and vote once you're ready! Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-24 Thread Ina Panova
I tried to address all the comments and updates the PR. Please give another look and vote once you're ready! Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-23 Thread Dana Walker
+1 I'm a little concerned about the stated drawbacks, but even the alternatives can have issues, so I think this is a good place to start and we can amend the process later if we run into problems and/or we arrive at a good solution to mitigate the drawbacks. --Dana Dana Walker Associate Softwa

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-17 Thread Robin Chan
+1 I like the clarification to the removal piece. You may accept the suggestions if they are helpful. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:32 AM, David Davis wrote: > Assuming there are no major changes to the PUP, I’ll vote +1. > > Thanks for putting this together. > > David > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-17 Thread David Davis
Assuming there are no major changes to the PUP, I’ll vote +1. Thanks for putting this together. David On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:21 AM Ina Panova wrote: > PR updated, > ready for re-review. > > > > > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where

Re: [Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-17 Thread Ina Panova
PR updated, ready for re-review. Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Ina Panova wrote: > I have opened a PR for PUP-6 [0] which describ

[Pulp-dev] Commit bit PUP-6

2018-08-16 Thread Ina Panova
I have opened a PR for PUP-6 [0] which describes the commit bit assignment/revocation process. Please take a look to review and provide feedback. I'd like to call for a vote by August 28, 2018. Per PUP-1[1], are the voting options: +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted.