Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-23 Thread David Davis
FYI, this has been merged. Thanks to all who voted and participated! David On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:38 AM David Davis wrote: > Good catch. I added a short sentence saying the version number should be > incremented by 1. > > David > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM Austin Macdonald > wrote

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-20 Thread David Davis
Good catch. I added a short sentence saying the version number should be incremented by 1. David On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM Austin Macdonald wrote: > +1 > > I suggested an addition, to increment the PUP version whenever a change is > made. I considered suggesting a version scheme to indic

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-20 Thread Austin Macdonald
+1 I suggested an addition, to increment the PUP version whenever a change is made. I considered suggesting a version scheme to indicate major and minor changes, but AFAICT there isn't a practical need beyond a simple integer. If the process is too cumbersome for typo fixing (for example), we can

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-11 Thread Ina Panova
+1 Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dana Walker wrote: > +1 > > Dana Walker > > Associate Software Engineer > > Red Hat > >

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-09 Thread Dana Walker
+1 Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Daniel Alley wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: > >> Hey David, >> >> thanks, +1 >> >> -- >> milan >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-09 Thread Daniel Alley
+1 On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: > Hey David, > > thanks, +1 > > -- > milan > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis wrote: > >> I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. >> Reviews/feedback are welcome: >> >> https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11 >>

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-09 Thread Milan Kovacik
Hey David, thanks, +1 -- milan On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis wrote: > I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. Reviews/feedback > are welcome: > > https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11 > > I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting > m

Re: [Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-09 Thread David Davis
I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. Reviews/feedback are welcome: https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11 I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting model from PUP-1: +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted." +0: "Might benef

[Pulp-dev] Revising PUPs

2018-07-03 Thread David Davis
While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are accepted[0], we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are accepted. I’d like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process for revising accepted PUPs. I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PU