Bradley Davis wrote:
> Do you think it would be worthwhile to add that note into the
> documentation? Or add a clarification to the general installation
> chapter as well as the nodes chapter? Numerous people on my team read it
> the same way, where resource manager and celerybeat were not to be ru
Do you think it would be worthwhile to add that note into the
documentation? Or add a clarification to the general installation chapter
as well as the nodes chapter? Numerous people on my team read it the same
way, where resource manager and celerybeat were not to be run on more than
one node?
On
Bradley Davis wrote:
> It makes it seems that pulp_resource_manager and pulp_celerybeat should
> not be running on the child node server. When looking at the Nodes
> chapter, neither services are mentioned.
Hello Brad!
Apologies for the confusion. Each node is a complete Pulp installation
that is
