[Pulp-list] vagrant provisioning fails

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Myers
I think most folks using vagrant recently have hit this, which is that "vagrant up" explodes on the dnf upgrade provisioning step. I've been poking at this off and on, and I have a diff that "fixes" it: --- $ diff -u Vagrantfile.example Vagrantfile --- Vagrantfile.example 2016-02-25 10:09:05.084

Re: [Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Randy Barlow
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Kodiak Firesmith wrote: > Will there be an "LTS-like" version released periodically for stable > production use? I mean, I get that it's not a supported product like > Satellite 6, but since I'm planning to use it in production I'd like to be > able to sti

Re: [Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Bryan Kearney
On 03/21/2016 10:02 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:56:04AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote: you guys are thinking a three month time based cadence? That is the current proposal. We discussed it during a meeting last week and it was suggested that something between 3 and 6 months

Re: [Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Kodiak Firesmith
Will there be an "LTS-like" version released periodically for stable production use? I mean, I get that it's not a supported product like Satellite 6, but since I'm planning to use it in production I'd like to be able to stick with a single version for about 12 months without feeling like I need t

Re: [Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Randy Barlow
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:56:04AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote: > you guys are thinking a three month time based cadence? That is the current proposal. We discussed it during a meeting last week and it was suggested that something between 3 and 6 months would work well. We can always adjust if we f

Re: [Pulp-list] Red hat minor version sync

2016-03-21 Thread Jeremy Cline
On 03/21/2016 09:36 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > Oleg, As I understand it rpm repositories don't support versioning, and > generally RHEL repos are constant being updated with new/better content. > Given that, unless there is a feed available for specifically RHEL 6.6 I > don't know of a way to do t

Re: [Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Bryan Kearney
On 03/21/2016 09:36 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: Jeremy and I wrote up a quick draft of a 2.9.0 release schedule over the weekend. We hadn't been using the Redmine Wiki, so we just put it on the main page for now: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki This is a draft and a Wiki, so feel free to su

Re: [Pulp-list] Red hat minor version sync

2016-03-21 Thread Brian Bouterse
Oleg, As I understand it rpm repositories don't support versioning, and generally RHEL repos are constant being updated with new/better content. Given that, unless there is a feed available for specifically RHEL 6.6 I don't know of a way to do this today with Pulp. One option is to sync a repo and

[Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

2016-03-21 Thread Randy Barlow
Jeremy and I wrote up a quick draft of a 2.9.0 release schedule over the weekend. We hadn't been using the Redmine Wiki, so we just put it on the main page for now: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki This is a draft and a Wiki, so feel free to suggest changes. We'd like to get this nailed do

[Pulp-list] Version 2.8 bug 1749 and production usage of Pulp

2016-03-21 Thread Vaclav Adamec
Hi, I still hitting this bug https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1749 and unable to use latest version. And seems that it's not critical for anybody else than me :-) So I'm a quite curious is there anybody else who use Pulp for Centos6 consumers ? How many users really use Pulp ? is it stable enough to u