[Puppet-dev] Fwd: Upcoming Puppet 3.7 Windows x64 Support / Breaking Changes for Module Authors

2014-08-19 Thread Ethan Brown
With the upcoming release of Puppet 3.7, we're introducing a Ruby x64 based installer for Windows. In addition, this x64 installer is based on Ruby 2.0.0, which is also an entirely new Ruby version for Puppet on Windows. Note that for the sake of a more measured roll-out of Ruby 2, we will contin

Re: [Puppet-dev] This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Jeff McCune
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > At this point i'm kinda stuck for argumentation, from my perspective, and > the > expressed bewilderment of many contributors it seems silly we even have to > bring this up at all. > I really appreciate that you and others brought this up. T

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Jeff McCune
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 7:55:08 AM UTC-7, Dawn Foster wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm working on this issue right now. I'm traveling this week, so it > may take a week or 2 for us to sort out. I can't guarantee a > particular resolution, since I need to talk to the person who made the > decision

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Dawn Foster
Hi All, I'm working on this issue right now. I'm traveling this week, so it may take a week or 2 for us to sort out. I can't guarantee a particular resolution, since I need to talk to the person who made the decision to do this and see if we can come up with a solution that causes less pain for th

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Trevor Vaughan
+1 to removing CLAs on single licensed modules. This creates an unnecessary barrier to people who may have restrictions from their corporate overlords with the CLA but no issue whatsoever with a pure FOSS contribution. Trevor On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Daniele Sluijters < daniele.sluijt..

[Puppet-dev] Re: This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Daniele Sluijters
Hey, I'm also fairly annoyed by the CLA bot on modules. Most, if not all, modules have been licensed under the Apache License 2.0 since their publication on Github. As such, contributions are automatically covered by this license. It might be worth mentioning this in a CONTRIBUTORS.md but havi

Re: [Puppet-dev] Duplicate features

2014-08-19 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:29 PM, badgerious wrote: > Thanks Rob. I guess I'd vote B as well, because, while A may work even > with some name collisions, it would be I think very confusing to debug if > there were ever a real conflict. As far as how back I want to support, > dunno really, I just t

[Puppet-dev] This is a trivial contribution.

2014-08-19 Thread Igor Galić
Fellow Humans, Recently the puppetcla bot has been activated for most puppetlabs-modules. This has sparked a *lot* of controversies from people who just contribute the most trivial of fixes, * https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-apache/pull/775 * https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-java