Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Gary Larizza
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Henrik Lindberg < henrik.lindb...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > On 23/02/16 01:47, Henrik Lindberg wrote: > >> Hi, I am thinking ahead a bit regarding puppet 5 and how we should deal >> with all the requests for features that require deprecations. (There are >> some re

[Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 23/02/16 01:47, Henrik Lindberg wrote: Hi, I am thinking ahead a bit regarding puppet 5 and how we should deal with all the requests for features that require deprecations. (There are some related things like requests for additional validation and warnings that are different from deprecations)

[Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 24/02/16 20:24, Walter Heck wrote: On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 11:49:17 AM UTC+1, Trevor Vaughan wrote: I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. If it could be part of the metadata.json, that would be ideal and would allow for attestation on the Fo

[Puppet-dev] Debian Package Naming Paradigm: Static Codenames only on apt.puppetlabs.com

2016-02-24 Thread Melissa Stone
We've stopped using the rolling release names (stable, testing) for our Debian packages and instead use the direct codenames. This maps better to our processes and is more maintainable over time. What this means is that the stable/testing portions of the apt repos will be removed. All packages will

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Trevor Vaughan
+1 to the mode support in the metadata.json Dependency checking will be more fun. Trevor On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Walter Heck wrote: > On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 11:49:17 AM UTC+1, Trevor Vaughan wrote: >> >> I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. >>

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Walter Heck
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 11:49:17 AM UTC+1, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. > > If it could be part of the metadata.json, that would be ideal and would > allow for attestation on the Forge if appropriate. > I gave this some thou

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Ryan Whitehurst
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Henrik Lindberg wrote: > On 24/02/16 11:49, Trevor Vaughan wrote: >> >> I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. >> >> If it could be part of the metadata.json, that would be ideal and would >> allow for attestation on the Forge if appropri

[Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 24/02/16 11:49, Trevor Vaughan wrote: I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. If it could be part of the metadata.json, that would be ideal and would allow for attestation on the Forge if appropriate. The global --strict=off should override any module-level setting.

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: How strict do you want puppet to be?

2016-02-24 Thread Trevor Vaughan
I'm also a fan of per module which can override a global setting. If it could be part of the metadata.json, that would be ideal and would allow for attestation on the Forge if appropriate. The global --strict=off should override any module-level setting. Thanks, Trevor On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at