On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> So, I have this working, but I'm not quite sure why I needed to do it this
> way.
>
> I took a look at the exec:returns property and the associated 'sync' define.
>
> I was getting an error about returning an invalid event and I wasn't
> sure
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 14:24, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Erg? I thought we were on a push to try and avoid reading the contents
> of unknown size files into memory where possible?
Well, it isn't a great idea; you are not obliged to do anything in
prefetch: if your file is of unbounded or unreasonab
Erg? I thought we were on a push to try and avoid reading the contents
of unknown size files into memory where possible?
Also, does this work with 0.24?
Still waiting for those last few bumps to be ironed out of 2.6.
Thanks,
Trevor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Mo
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 14:14, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> I *think* I get what you're saying, but how would you translate this
> to something that needs to see if an entry in a file is synchronized?
So, let me be clear: *if* you can avoid replacing sync, that would be
good. If you can't, and it is
Daniel,
I *think* I get what you're saying, but how would you translate this
to something that needs to see if an entry in a file is synchronized?
Yes, I know that I could possibly use parsed file, but it didn't work
out of the box the way I needed and it was faster to start from
scratch than try
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 13:05, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> So, I have this working, but I'm not quite sure why I needed to do it this
> way.
> I took a look at the exec:returns property and the associated 'sync' define.
This is, for reference, a bad model to build new types off; like file,
it predat
Fancy.
I tried searching for several things but came up empty. This is
probably something that should go on the dev wiki (if anyone is of a
mind to do so).
Thanks!
Trevor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Stefan Schulte
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> So, I have this working, but I'm not quite sure why I needed to do it this
> way.
>
> I took a look at the exec:returns property and the associated 'sync' define.
>
> I was getting an error about returning an invalid event and I w
So, I have this working, but I'm not quite sure why I needed to do it this way.
I took a look at the exec:returns property and the associated 'sync' define.
I was getting an error about returning an invalid event and I wasn't
sure what type of event I was supposed to return in sync.
I noticed th
