Hi All,
I'm curious as to what decisions (if any) have been made here.
Thanks,
Trevor
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
wrote:
I'm in 100% agreement with John here.
Right now, I have a forked Hiera that I'm using based off of some patches
that I have
I was also curious where (and if there was a guess when) to look for nightly
builds so I can start testing the decisions made.
Thanks,
jl
On Dec 7, 2014, at 16:33, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm curious as to what decisions (if any) have been made here.
On Friday, November 21, 2014 2:47:05 PM UTC-6, Eric Sorenson wrote:
5 - Why not use a metapackage which has no content of its own, but has
requirements on specific versions of the other 'real' packages that contain
the actual programs?
• Avoiding a coordinated major version
I'm in 100% agreement with John here.
Right now, I have a forked Hiera that I'm using based off of some patches
that I have PRs in for. Once this gets resolved, I'll merge everything back
to the mainline, but I *must* have the ability to deviate when necessary
for the best results of my users.
On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Eric Sorenson eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com
wrote:
7. Umm.. I think that's all.
Wow thanks for all the responses, there are a ton of very good questions in
here -- some of them got answered inline and I think we rolled up the rest into
this little FAQ. which
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Eric Sorenson
eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Eric Sorenson eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com
wrote:
7. Umm.. I think that's all.
Wow thanks for all the responses, there are a ton of very good questions
in here -- some of
I can only imagine how much time has been lost over the years trying to
support ruby 1.8.7. I think this is a great move as long as we can still
install puppet using gems under a newer ruby. Will the ffi gem be part of
the AIO package?
I won't even bother creating a ticket for a bug I just
