On 10 September 2014 09:12, Spencer Krum krum.spen...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes integration would have to be opt-in. I'm sure the maintainers of those
tools would want it that way anyways. And everything would have to respect
the http_proxy variable, everyone's favorite variable in corporate
If anyone does tool integration PLEASE make it opt-in.
It's always fun trying to explain why your tools are pounding on the inside
of a corporate firewall.
Trevor
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Gareth Rushgrove gar...@morethanseven.net
wrote:
On 7 September 2014 15:57, Spencer Krum
Yes integration would have to be opt-in. I'm sure the maintainers of those
tools would want it that way anyways. And everything would have to respect
the http_proxy variable, everyone's favorite variable in corporate settings.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
On 7 September 2014 15:57, Spencer Krum krum.spen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Puppet-dev,
I've been working, with a lot of help from some others, on a new project at
http://puppet-analytics.org. It is very much in the experimental/development
phase and I'm looking for feedback and help.
The goal
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Spencer Krum krum.spen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Puppet-dev,
I've been working, with a lot of help from some others, on a new project
at http://puppet-analytics.org. It is very much in the
experimental/development phase and I'm looking for feedback and help.
Thanks for the positive feedback Andy!
I'm wondering if there would be a way of saying all of these installations
are for the same 'site'. That would remove a module looking popular simply
because it is installed a lot, but only by two or three groups. Maybe that
information is valuable,
Hi Puppet-dev,
I've been working, with a lot of help from some others, on a new project at
http://puppet-analytics.org. It is very much in the
experimental/development phase and I'm looking for feedback and help.
The goal of this project is to enable module authors and users greater
visibility
