Re: [Puppet Users] puppet for switches

2010-05-04 Thread Luke Kanies
On May 4, 2010, at 9:25 PM, James Turnbull wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/05/10 1:53 PM, Geoff Crompton wrote: This might be a crazy idea, but it just popped into my head, and I wanted to know if it's possible. Perhaps not possible right now, but possible in a theore

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet for switches

2010-05-04 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/05/10 1:53 PM, Geoff Crompton wrote: > This might be a crazy idea, but it just popped into my head, and I > wanted to know if it's possible. Perhaps not possible right now, but > possible in a theoretical sense. > > Is it possible that puppet cou

[Puppet Users] puppet for switches

2010-05-04 Thread Geoff Crompton
This might be a crazy idea, but it just popped into my head, and I wanted to know if it's possible. Perhaps not possible right now, but possible in a theoretical sense. Is it possible that puppet could be modified to be used to manage switches that have a command line based interface? When I man

Re: [Puppet Users] Issue with naginator and elusive nagios cfg file corruption (#3712)

2010-05-04 Thread Joe McDonagh
On 05/04/2010 03:00 PM, David Schmitt wrote: Am 03.05.2010 21:33, schrieb Joe McDonagh: Hello, I have run into a data corruption problem with naginator that is fairly difficult for me to track down. Hand-written configurations do not suffer from this fate. This was present in .24.8, and still pr

Re: [Puppet Users] Issue with naginator and elusive nagios cfg file corruption (#3712)

2010-05-04 Thread David Schmitt
Am 03.05.2010 21:33, schrieb Joe McDonagh: Hello, I have run into a data corruption problem with naginator that is fairly difficult for me to track down. Hand-written configurations do not suffer from this fate. This was present in .24.8, and still present in .25.4. I'd love to complete this auto

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.5.4 and Ruby 1.9.1

2010-05-04 Thread Cameron Smith
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:01 AM, James Turnbull wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Cameron Smith wrote: > > Thanks for the info James! > > I'll drop down and try again :) > > Cameron > > It'd be great if you could the specific issues you had as bug tickets so > we can be

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.5.4 and Ruby 1.9.1

2010-05-04 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cameron Smith wrote: > Thanks for the info James! > I'll drop down and try again :) Cameron It'd be great if you could the specific issues you had as bug tickets so we can be sure we fix them for Ruby 1.9.x Thanks James Turnbull - -- Author of: *

Re: [Puppet Users] adding users help.

2010-05-04 Thread Thomas Bellman
On 2010-05-03 19:06, merritt wrote: I want to be able to add additional resources to my virtual users, such as force a file or directory to exist if I realize that user, if someone could point me in the right direction, I’m guessing i need to use a definition I’m just not sure on the best way to

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.5.4 and Ruby 1.9.1

2010-05-04 Thread Cameron Smith
Thanks for the info James! I'll drop down and try again :) On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 4/05/10 1:32 AM, velvetpixel wrote: > > First time Puppet user so please bear with me :) > > > > Is Puppet 2.5.4 compatible wit

Re: [Puppet Users] PSON error?

2010-05-04 Thread Patrick
Do you have version 0.25.x puppet clients connecting to version 0.24.x servers? This looks a bit like that error. On May 4, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Kent Rankin wrote: > Can anyone shed any light to this error message? We're getting a > number of them. > > Tue May 04 08:18:35 -0400 2010 ///File[

[Puppet Users] PSON error?

2010-05-04 Thread Kent Rankin
Can anyone shed any light to this error message? We're getting a number of them. Tue May 04 08:18:35 -0400 2010 ///File[/usr/local//] (err): Failed to generate additional resources using 'eval_generate': Could not intern_multiple from pson: source did not contain any PSON! Thanks. -

Re: [Puppet Users] mcollective scalability

2010-05-04 Thread R.I.Pienaar
hello, Probably best to send this kind of thing to mcollective's mailing list rather than puppets :) - "linuxdatacenter" wrote: > I've been thinking a lot about running mcollective on my production > servers recently, especially about its nice integration with puppet > (using facts and so

[Puppet Users] mcollective scalability

2010-05-04 Thread linuxdatacenter
I've been thinking a lot about running mcollective on my production servers recently, especially about its nice integration with puppet (using facts and so on). However I've got some concern about its scalability - how publish/subscribe middleware scales in terms of speed and flooding the network.

Re: AW: [Puppet Users] Re: complex data types in puppet & facter

2010-05-04 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/05/10 5:59 PM, Patrick wrote: > I think that Rwolf is puppet 0.2*6*.x. > That's correct. Next maintenance release is 0.25.5 - currently in testing. Next feature release is Rowlff which doesn't have a version number assigned as yet and is the f

[Puppet Users] Introducing Scaffold

2010-05-04 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I?ve just written and released Scaffold (http://github.com/jamtur01/puppet-scaffold) ? a very simple Puppet scaffolding templating tool. It integrates with Puppet to create a variety of Puppet configuration and objects. You can install it via a gem cu

[Puppet Users] Re: use both ldap and text files

2010-05-04 Thread walexey
I want use node_terminus=ldap, not 'exec'. On 30 апр, 17:25, Michael DeHaan wrote: > /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp (which probably loads your nodes.pp) and > an external node source can be used together. > > So if you have an external nodes tool that queries LDAP, it would also > work with site.p

Re: AW: [Puppet Users] Re: complex data types in puppet & facter

2010-05-04 Thread Patrick
I think that Rwolf is puppet 0.26.x. On May 4, 2010, at 12:43 AM, Bernd Adamowicz wrote: > Ok, found the answer myself. Just installed 25.5-rc2 on client and server and > tried it. But same error message when parsing the template. > >> Is there an elegant way to use complex facts in puppe

AW: [Puppet Users] Re: complex data types in puppet & facter

2010-05-04 Thread Bernd Adamowicz
Ok, found the answer myself. Just installed 25.5-rc2 on client and server and tried it. But same error message when parsing the template. > > > > Is there an elegant way to use complex facts in puppet's erb > templates? > > > > Puppet will support hashes in the next major version (Rwolf), > alth

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: New user: How to deploy new version of a custom RPM package?

2010-05-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
JRendell writes: [...] > I specifically want to use the RPM provider, not the yum provider. Ah, sorry. I missed that, somehow, and have never used the RPM provider. I think other people have answered your questions there, though, which I hope is helpful to you. Thanks for not hating me for my

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: New user: How to deploy new version of a custom RPM package?

2010-05-04 Thread Peter Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I specifically want to use the RPM provider, not the yum provider. > Otherwise (as I understand it) I will have to set up a yum repository > for each machine (or at least environment), and updating/rolling back > our app will be more complicated than

[Puppet Users] Re: complex data types in puppet & facter

2010-05-04 Thread badamowicz
> > Is there an elegant way to use complex facts in puppet's erb templates? > > Puppet will support hashes in the next major version (Rwolf), although I am > not sure if the interaction between Puppet and Facter will support it. Dan, does this mean it will be possible to have a template like this