Re: [Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:44:20PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: BUUT... maybe I am thinking about this all wrong after all. Possibly the better way is to give facter a custom set of facts... and then since facter output gets automatically stored on the master when puppet runs on the client If

[Puppet Users] Prefixing syslog messages with client names

2010-10-12 Thread Kenneth Holter
Hi. The puppetmaster is set up to log to syslog, which is working fine. The downside is that most of the log entries created by the puppetmaster does not indicate which puppet client that message if from. So basically I have lots and lots of syslog entries created by the puppetmaster, but no

[Puppet Users] [0.25.5] Default provider

2010-10-12 Thread Tim Stoop
Hi all, To start, using puppet 0.25.5 on Debian Lenny with Ruby 1.8.7.72-3lenny1. I'm giving ruby a shot and am trying to build my own types for several applications and modify available types found on the 'net for our usage. However, I keep running into problems with the default provider it

Re: [Puppet Users] Prefixing syslog messages with client names

2010-10-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Kenneth Holter wrote: Hi. The puppetmaster is set up to log to syslog, which is working fine. The downside is that most of the log entries created by the puppetmaster does not indicate which puppet client that message if from. So basically I have

Re: [Puppet Users] Prefixing syslog messages with client names

2010-10-12 Thread Mohit Chawla
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Bruce Richardson itsbr...@workshy.orgwrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Kenneth Holter wrote: Hi. The puppetmaster is set up to log to syslog, which is working fine. The downside is that most of the log entries created by the puppetmaster

[Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread Philip Brown
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:44:20PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: BUUT... maybe I am thinking about this all wrong after all. Possibly the better way is to give facter a custom set of facts... and then since facter output gets automatically stored on the master when puppet runs on the client On

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Philip Brown phil.googlen...@bolthole.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:44:20PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: BUUT... maybe I am thinking about this all wrong after all. Possibly the better way is to give facter a custom set of facts... and then since facter

[Puppet Users] Puppetrun reports certificates were not trusted

2010-10-12 Thread Christian
Hi all, All my nodes are signed successfully with the puppetmaster. A manual puppetd run works perfectly on every node. A report is generated for each run in puppet-dashboard. All machines are correctly synchronised via ntp. Using puppetrun on one of my node works without problem. However using

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:48:30AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: Is it crucial that the data be current at the beginning any puppet run? Is the data itself used in configuring the host, or is it just the presence of current data that has an effect on how/when puppet runs? Weeelll.. this

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread R.I.Pienaar
hello, - Bruce Richardson itsbr...@workshy.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:48:30AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: Is it crucial that the data be current at the beginning any puppet run? Is the data itself used in configuring the host, or is it just the presence of current data

Re: [Puppet Users] [0.25.5] Default provider

2010-10-12 Thread Patrick
On Oct 12, 2010, at 5:56 AM, Tim Stoop wrote: Hi all, To start, using puppet 0.25.5 on Debian Lenny with Ruby 1.8.7.72-3lenny1. I'm giving ruby a shot and am trying to build my own types for several applications and modify available types found on the 'net for our usage. However, I

[Puppet Users] modifiying facts that facter collects

2010-10-12 Thread David Grundy
Hello All. Is there some way to create new facts for facter to report? Is there a configuration file somewhere for facter? Thanks in advance. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to

[Puppet Users] Re: serialized or limited parallelism

2010-10-12 Thread donavan
On Oct 11, 2:09 pm, Philip Brown phil.googlen...@bolthole.com wrote: Is there any pre-existing functionality in puppet, to allow limiting parallelism? There's nothing inherent in puppet, besides the 'splay' options. The other common solution is to use the $rand_from_fqdn custom Fact pattern.

Re: [Puppet Users] modifiying facts that facter collects

2010-10-12 Thread Patrick
The phrase you're looking for to add facts to a single machine is custom facts. (Google it) If you want to push them out automatically using puppet, try adding facts. (Google it) On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:20 PM, David Grundy wrote: Hello All. Is there some way to create new facts for facter