On Feb 15, 1:27 pm, David Bishop wrote:
> Does this sound reasonable? Is it currently possible (and if so,
> pointers are welcome!)? If I could make my trained developer monkey do
> the actual work, would patches implementing this be accepted?
You may also be interested in the --summarize optio
On Feb 15, 10:04 am, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
> Say we have a directory called /FOO-- we want to only have in it what
> puppet puts into it.
...
> puppet resource file /tmp/empty_me ensure=directory purge=true
> source=/tmp/empty recurse=true recurselimit=1 force=true
I use this pattern myself, so
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:12:57PM -0800, trey85stang wrote:
> Thanks Ben, that is simple enough.
Other people have had success with putting HAProxy in front of
Apache/Passenger stacks too. Which is simpler in terms of structure, but
more components.
--
ben
--
You received this message becau
I think you're saying that it's close enough that it shouldn't matter. In the
context of this thread, there's a huge difference though. If the puppet client
is in a DMZ, (and can't connect to the puppetmaster) it needs the catalog to be
pushed to the client. Not just the server telling the cl
Thanks Ben, that is simple enough.
On Feb 15, 8:38 pm, Ben Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:30:29PM -0800, trey85stang wrote:
> > while I am at it, what is the best way to load balance between
> > multiple servers using passenger? a dedicated load balancer or can
> > the balancing be
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:30:29PM -0800, trey85stang wrote:
> while I am at it, what is the best way to load balance between
> multiple servers using passenger? a dedicated load balancer or can
> the balancing be done within passenger like mongrel?
As you're using Passenger you could get Apach
while I am at it, what is the best way to load balance between
multiple servers using passenger? a dedicated load balancer or can
the balancing be done within passenger like mongrel?
On Feb 15, 8:11 pm, trey85stang wrote:
> Hey All, I'm still experimenting with a puppet backend for 6000
> hos
Hey All, I'm still experimenting with a puppet backend for 6000
hosts. I have switched from mongrel to a passenger backend on a
single puppetserver.
Afterwards any node that is not defined in the external nodes script,
is now rejected even if they have an entry in my nodes.pp manifest.
With the
Thanks for trying to help, Trevor.
On Feb 15, 8:31 pm, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The the puppet user read everything under this directory space on the server?
Yes, the puppet user can read everything. I've just triple-checked by
running $ sudo -
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Rus Hughes wrote:
[snip]
>
> require 'puppet'
>
> Puppet::Reports.register_report(:nagios) do
> Puppet.settings.use(:reporting)
> desc "Sends reports directly to Nagios"
>
> def process
> begin
> exec "/usr/lib/nagios/eventhandlers/submit_pupp
in spite of this not actually being a "push" mechanism if it walks like a
duck. it would be nice if the documentation and previous discussions on this
were more clear or even better if it's not a "push" then the it should be
"redefined" within puppet world. IMHO
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The the puppet user read everything under this directory space on the server?
On 02/15/2011 10:46 AM, PeterBurkholder wrote:
> In my haste to catch my train I forgot a few points.
>
> 1) I've tried now with 2.6.4 and had the same problem
> 2) I've us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is completely possible.
Look at the threads on pushing out pre-compiled configurations.
You do lose some features, such as pulling from the puppet filestore unless
that's OK with you.
Trevor
On 02/15/2011 02:16 PM, Kristopher wrote:
> I would
System information:
Distro: Ubuntu 10.4.x
Ruby: ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02
Puppetmaster: 2.6.1
Puppetclient: 2.6.1
Dashboard: 1.0.4-1
I was running a puppet run manually like this:
# puppetd --test --verbose
This is the log for the run:
notice: Ignoring --listen on onetime run
info: Retrievi
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 17:11, Gabriel Filion wrote:
> On 11-02-15 05:25 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
>> You can also create class level dependency so it is less tightly
>> coupled to a specific resource which may benefit you in the long run
>> should you need to refactor dns_config class.
>>
>> class rando
On 11-02-15 05:25 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
> You can also create class level dependency so it is less tightly
> coupled to a specific resource which may benefit you in the long run
> should you need to refactor dns_config class.
>
> class random_app {
> require dns_config
> ...
> }
hmm this actuall
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:39, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> On 2011/02/14, at 12:21, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> I think this discussion totally deserves a feature/bug report in redmine,
>> because both positions are reasonable. They do point to a hole where our
>> specifation seems vague, and where
Not sure where I got 'host" from... replaced with with "hostname" and
that works!
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
> I just run into the same issue the fact "host" is not found inside
> a template:
>
> In a template I have:
>
> <% if host == "balmoral" -%>
> ...
> <% en
I have this ouput when I do a "yum check-update" which is the command
which is run in the yumhelper.py :
Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
This system is not registered with RHN.
RHN support will be disabled.
Skipping security plugin, no data
compat-dapl.i386 2.0.13-4.el
I just run into the same issue the fact "host" is not found inside
a template:
In a template I have:
<% if host == "balmoral" -%>
...
<% end -%>
I get error:
Error 400 on SERVER: Failed to parse template
gu_iptables/iptables.conf.erb: Could not find value for 'host'
Any luck with this?
T
Hi Puppet Users,
In my configuration, I modify in the "pre" stage the ldap.conf file
which is originally generic and useless.
Then, in the main stage, I try to modify the ownership of files with
ldap users and groups and I have an error "Cannot find user/group".
I have done several tests :
- jus
On 2011/02/14, at 12:21, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Hey.
>
> I think this discussion totally deserves a feature/bug report in redmine,
> because both positions are reasonable. They do point to a hole where our
> specifation seems vague, and where we *should* have made a decision: right
> now we
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:05, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> […]
>> So I've got two modules, one for "random_app" and one for "dns_config".
>> "dns_config" has a file resource "resolv.conf" which is just what the name
>> implies.
>>
>> I wa
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:05, Derek J. Balling wrote:
[…]
> So I've got two modules, one for "random_app" and one for "dns_config".
> "dns_config" has a file resource "resolv.conf" which is just what the name
> implies.
>
> I want service 'foo' in my random_app module to subscribe to dns_confi
Other people answered other parts of this, but to be totally clear:
'puppet kick' is *NOT* a push mechanism for puppet. It is a mechanism
to trigger the regular, pull-based, puppet run on a specific machine.
In the bigger picture I would strongly suggest you just open the
single port used for pu
We're starting to integrate mcollective into our puppet usage here at
work, and we've discovered a (heretofore unknown) need for more logging
"levels".
Using the puppetd mcollective agent, we would like to kick off single
puppet runs. What we're hoping for is that we could take the output from
pup
Hello All,
I'm using puppet 0.25.5, and I'm having issues with an ERB template and
its syntax. Instead of declaring a var true or false, I'd like to do
something if the variable is defined, otherwise ignore. So here's what I
have in my template:
<% if defined?("VAR") and VAR == "ABC" th
My experience is having "listen = true" in the puppet conf and starting the
client with --no-client does prevent the puppet pull. This works for me so
that I can issue a puppet kick on the server to only serve changes when I
want to.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Kristopher wrote:
> I would like to confirm that the following is not possible:
> I have servers I would like to manage via puppet in my DMZ, I have my
> puppet server in the trusted zone of my network. Due to this
> arrangement (which cannot be changed due to oth
Nan's suggestion worked. I thought I'd tried these steps but maybe not
in the right order.
Thank you, Nan!
Here were the steps:
mrisher@lab2:~$ sudo /etc/init.d//puppetmaster stop
* Stopping puppet configuration management tool master
server [ O
On 15 February 2011 19:21, Kristopher wrote:
> I would like to confirm that the following is not possible:
> I have servers I would like to manage via puppet in my DMZ, I have my
> puppet server in the trusted zone of my network. Due to this
> arrangement (which cannot be changed due to other serv
I'm happy to announce we've recently added Randall Hansen as our
Director of User Experience at Puppet Labs.
He's on IRC as 'soh', and in his own words...
I got hooked on human-computer interaction in 1986, writing Pascal
programs to help dad navigate a Tandy 1000SX. I followed a twisty
path thr
I would like to confirm that the following is not possible:
I have servers I would like to manage via puppet in my DMZ, I have my
puppet server in the trusted zone of my network. Due to this
arrangement (which cannot be changed due to other services running on
the puppet master) puppet clients cann
I would like to confirm that the following is not possible:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr.
I tried looking in the language tutorial for this, but I couldn't find a
reference for how to do it, but I'm sure it must be possible.
So I've got two modules, one for "random_app" and one for "dns_config".
"dns_config" has a file resource "resolv.conf" which is just what the name
implies.
I w
On Feb 12, 10:16 pm, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:01, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Monkeys Typing
> > wrote:
> >> I have an exec in my samba module to join the new servers to the
> >> domain, a simple "net ads join -U adminaccount".
>
> >> I s
Say we have a directory called /FOO-- we want to only have in it what
puppet puts into it. I want to remove any symlinks, empty directories,
or files in it that don't belong -- but only one level deep. If the
subdirectory has content, I don't want it removed -- ideally, I'd like
a failure. This i
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Rus Hughes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We'd like to run puppet regularly in noop then trigger an event after
>> the run depending on the results, namely to hook puppet in to our
>> Nagios implementation so that if an
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to run puppet regularly in noop then trigger an event after
> the run depending on the results, namely to hook puppet in to our
> Nagios implementation so that if anything changes for any reason we
> receive an alert.
>
> We al
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:43 AM, tortuegeniale
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Getting some troubles installing bind:
> err: Could not run Puppet configuration client: Could not find user
> bind
It looks to me like you don't have a User 'bind' on the target system,
and you haven't defined one in the above
I'm rather new to puppet and I've been trying to get a module to work
on the client servers. Right now I'm trying to get
http://forge.puppetlabs.com/ghoneycutt/pam to run. When I try to run
it I get these two errors:
err: //pam/File[/etc/pam.d/sshd]: Failed to retrieve current state of
resource:
Hi,
We'd like to run puppet regularly in noop then trigger an event after
the run depending on the results, namely to hook puppet in to our
Nagios implementation so that if anything changes for any reason we
receive an alert.
We already have puppet configured to send out puppet reports via email
How do I make sure "puppetrun" is using the same configuration directory
Passenger is using? when I run "/usr/sbin/puppetrun --configprint confdir"
all I get is "finished" as the end result... and nothing else... has anyone
experience this before? I'm running:
CentOS 5.4
httpd-2.2.3-31.el5.ce
In my haste to catch my train I forgot a few points.
1) I've tried now with 2.6.4 and had the same problem
2) I've used 'ensure => directory,' and variations of 'recurse =>
true', 'recurse => remote' to no effect
3) The 'secrets' directory is created, but nothing recursive copied
into it
4) The fi
Hi all,
Getting some troubles installing bind:
I'm working on debian squeeze, both client and server are 2.6.2,
mod_passenger added.
in my class definition:
class conf_bind_nshost {
include motd
motd::register{"${name}": } #Register in motd
module
package { "bind9":
ensure => "1:9.7.2.
sorry, /etc/hosts. It was a typo in my bug report, I used the correct
filename on the client itself.
The routing issue is not the culprit -- puppetd is clearly able to
reach the puppetmasterd server -- so we're stuck somewhere inside
either what the client says or what the server responds with.
S
Good morning,
I am missing something, probably something obvious, in making file
serving
recursion work. I've boiled this down to a simple site.pp, and I
still can't
get a recursive copy to work, although a single file works fine. I'm
using puppet 2.6.5 on both the master and
the client, and th
On 02/11/2011 03:42 PM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running puppet 0.25.5 and I'm running into an issue with virtual
> defines for setting up my NGinx Vhosts.
>
> The define is as follows:
>
> class nginx{
>
> ...
>
>
> # Setup a resource to create the configuration f
On 02/11/2011 12:13 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> dragonfly said:
>> I wish to have puppet copy a file to /etc/cron.hourly/ on target
>> machines, however when puppetmaster attempts to build the catalog it
>> complains about a syntax error in both nodes.pp as well as in the
>> manifest init.pp for th
On 02/10/2011 11:00 PM, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
> Sorry am confused... it's end of day
>
> This does seem to flatten my array:
>
> $myarray = [ ["a","b"],["c","d"] ]
>
> While this does not:
>
> $myarray1=["a","b"]
> $myarray2=["c","d"]
>
> $myarray = [ $myarray1,$myarray2 ]
>
> Thanks.
Ye
I'm an advocate of both camps.
I use puppet in standalone mode when I'm demonstrating puppet to a new
client.
It's lightweight, I can use NFS or a CM repository to provide the
recipes to a server and run it standalone post kickstart. It's the
perfect mode for small scale repeatable system builds. Q
@ Mark
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I set the /etc/host but that doesn't appear
/etc/host or /etc/hosts ??
Is that a typo ?
On 15 February 2011 10:49, mark risher wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I set the /etc/host but that doesn't appear
> any different from specifying --server xyz on
> realize(User[1], User[2], User[10])
>
>
> ah, but your collection syntax requires that you have to know the gid of
> the resources you are realizing :)
>
> There are certainly cases where the collection syntax is easier, but I
> feel that the vast majority of virtual resource realizat
53 matches
Mail list logo
