Hmm, I just realised that this message that I posted earlier (when this topic
was current ;-) bounced because I forgot which email account I was
subscribed to this list through and posted through the wrong addy... doh! So
here is the message anyway since I think the gladepyc author has
Christian Robottom Reis writes:
Why _not_ libglade, btw?
The user has to have it installed.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
I agree that a) and b) are yucky. I much prefer:
c) using `make' to re-generate the code whenever you change
the .glade file, and never otherwise change the code.
I guess... you have to rely on the generated code being good, of course,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
Is there that much difference between using libglade to load a .glade
file versus loading a .py generated from the same .glade file?
Well, you can maintain the glade file through glade throughout the
lifetime of your product, versus either a)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:57:04AM -0200, Rodrigo Senra wrote:
Does anybody still use glc.py ? If not, what do you use instead to
generate code templates from glade (if you do) ?
Just an FYI, since you asked, I am using gladepyc to generate
the main part of the GUI I'm building, along
Hello Rodrigo, I'm the guy who wrote gladepyc.
On Thursday, 18 October 2001, you (Rodrigo Senra) wrote:
...
Cool tip about gladepyc, is there a good reason for the absence of a link
to this project in PyGTK Home Page ?
Good idea. Don't know why, I didn't think about it before. However I
|Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED],
|on Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:02:25 -0200 (BRST)
|about Re: [pygtk] Patch to those who use glc.py (Python Glade Code Generator)
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Rodrigo Senra wrote:
Does anybody still use glc.py ? If not, what do you use instead
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Rodrigo Senra wrote:
As for Libglade I already had heard, but haven't tried though (I will now!)
Libglade is trop cool. It loads the glade file in runtime and renders the
widgets for you. No more defining boxes in code, or digging through lines
and lines of pack_start()
Hi,
I have sent an e-mail to glc.py creator's Bill Allen with a
patch that fixes notebook code generation. The same patch is included
in this message. Till now I have not receive a response from him.
Does anybody know a way to contact him ?
Does anybody still use glc.py ? If not,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Rodrigo Senra wrote:
Does anybody still use glc.py ? If not, what do you use instead to
generate code templates from glade (if you do) ?
There is the libglade alternative, which IMHO is much superior to code
generation; if you must use code generation, there is the
10 matches
Mail list logo
