Re: [pygtk] Python 2.1 / Gtk+ 2.0

2001-03-14 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Peter Kese wrote: Hi! I am planning a project based on pygtk in which I am planning to use Python 2.1 NumPy 18.0 - makes use of new Python 2.1 features PyGtk - as I need to be portable to Unix and Windows GdkPixbuf As it is

Re: [pygtk] Python 2.1 / Gtk+ 2.0

2001-03-14 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:07:35PM -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote: Okay, I'm confused. On the one hand, James says: James First of all, there will never be a gtk 1.4 (they decided that James about a year ago)... then later writes: James I don't think the C API has really

Re: [pygtk] Python 2.1 / Gtk+ 2.0

2001-03-14 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Skip Montanaro wrote: Okay, I'm confused. On the one hand, James says: James First of all, there will never be a gtk 1.4 (they decided that James about a year ago)... then later writes: James I don't think the C API has really changed much since 1.4

Re: [pygtk] Python 2.1 / Gtk+ 2.0

2001-03-14 Thread Skip Montanaro
James You have taken my response out of context :) The question was James whether pygtk worked with python 2.1, and I was saying that the C James API (of python) has not changed incompatibly for a long time. Thanks for the clarification. It hadn't occurred to me that the second 1.4