Thanks for your feedback... Good stuff.
-Original Message-
From: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cliff Wells
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:55 PM
To: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pylon with Apache
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 11:21 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> There is also another way of integrating with apache:
> http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/mod_wsgi/
When I saw this module, I thought "oh, cool" and actually (briefly)
considered trying to port it to Nginx, but came back to the arguments
There is also another way of integrating with apache:
http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/mod_wsgi/
Wichert.
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
> > > What are the advantages
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:42 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
> > > What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead
> > > of just usingmod_python?
> >
> > Ty
On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
> > What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead of
> > just usingmod_python?
>
> Typically, proxying is:
>
> 1. easier to setup thanmod_python
> 2. easi
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:33 -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> I find using Paster and proxying through Apache is simply less
> frustrating than using mod_python. Furthermore, you can completely
> leave Apache out of the mix during development which means no setup to
> worry about.
One more: in
I find using Paster and proxying through Apache is simply less
frustrating than using mod_python. Furthermore, you can completely
leave Apache out of the mix during development which means no setup to
worry about.
Happy Hacking!
-jj
On 4/27/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
> What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead of
> just using mod_python?
Typically, proxying is:
1. easier to setup than mod_python
2. easier to upgrade Python (no mod_python/python version issues)
3. doesn't r
cons to doing a proxy
instead of just using mod_python?
AtDhVaAnNkCsE !!
-Original Message-
From: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shannon -jj Behrens
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:58 PM
To: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pylon wit
On 4/20/07, Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/20/07, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Actually it's the word "database" that's that's throwing me, admin is
> > totally cool :) Unless I'm missing the whole point, and I doubt that I am,
> > you guys are writing code to
On 4/20/07, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually it's the word "database" that's that's throwing me, admin is
> totally cool :) Unless I'm missing the whole point, and I doubt that I am,
> you guys are writing code to generate "scaffold" views and controllers for
> projects' declared
On 4/19/07, Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/19/07, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > There is a discussion on this list called "automatic database
> > > administration tool" that you might want to rea
> In TurboGears, they have CatWalk, but it's for SQLObject. Django has
> this feature as well. Pylons doesn't. When I chose Pylons, I felt
> that it had benefits that were more important than this one feature.
> But, your mileage may vary. If this is a feature that you absolutely
> must have,
On 4/19/07, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/19/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
> ideas
> > > in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
> two.
> > >
> > >There a
On 4/19/07, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/19/07, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > There is a discussion on this list called "automatic database
> > administration tool" that you might want to read. Pylons does not include
> > these tools out-of-the-box.
> >
> >
>
On 4/19/07, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/19/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
> > ideas
> > > in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
> > two.
> > >
> > >##
On 4/19/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
> ideas
> > in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
> two.
> >
> >There are not predefined views
> >
> >based on these in Pylons. You
> ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel ideas
> in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are two.
>
>There are not predefined views
>
>based on these in Pylons. You can certainly
> write an application that uses an ORM for database
Thanks for your help.
These links are helped me to install my first pylon app under apache.
One info:
When I want to set proxy to root, I need to define as:
ProxyPass / http://localhost:5000/
ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:5000/
So: the last / sign is needed to apache transfer addresses in
On 4/18/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Shannon -jj Behrens írta:
> > 4. To deal with the reload problem, *in development* I like to set
> > Apache's MaxRequestsPerChild to 1.
> Yes, this is the only way to get out from "Module Reloading" hell.
> But I don't know that this "MaxRequ
Shannon -jj Behrens írta:
> 1. You can use any DBAPI adaptor with Pylons in order to talk to a
> database without using an ORM. I've used one before on Linux to talk
> to SQLServer.
> 2. Some ORMs may not support ODBC. I do know that SQLAlchemy works
> with both SQLServer and Oracle, though.
Th
On 4/17/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Jose Galvez írta:
> > as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
> > has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
> > on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all packa
On 4/17/07, durumdara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Jose Galvez írta:
> > as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
> > has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
> > on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all pack
Hi!
Jose Galvez írta:
> as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
> has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
> on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
> there is also the mxODBC package. On linux I'm not s
as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
there is also the mxODBC package. On linux I'm not sure. As for
Apache, I use pylo
Hi,
On Apr 12, 5:55 pm, "durumdara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I want to ask about Pylons:
> Can I use Pylons under Apache?
Sure you can. Check out
http://docs.pythonweb.org/display/pylonscookbook/Deployment,
there are plenty of options.
> We have PHP, Python sites (8-10 virtual hosts) an
Hi!
An user helped me with this:
You could consider modwsgi:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/
And next I found this info:
http://pylonshq.com/project/pylonshq/wiki/ModPython
But I need to get answer to these questions too:
1.)
The development under modpy sometimes became very hard, beca
27 matches
Mail list logo
