On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Dirk Rothe wrote:
Am 03.09.2016, 18:34 Uhr, schrieb Andi Vajda :
Here is how one can reproduce what I just did:
- cd ~/apache
- git clone --branch branch_6x https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr.git
lucene.6x
- cd
- svn update
make sure you have a modern setuptools (i
Am 03.09.2016, 18:34 Uhr, schrieb Andi Vajda :
Here is how one can reproduce what I just did:
- cd ~/apache
- git clone --branch branch_6x
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr.git lucene.6x
- cd
- svn update
make sure you have a modern setuptools (if you are on linux, the
setuptoo
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Andi Vajda wrote:
Thank you Jan for starting this thread !
Of the nine people that responded, three were interested in a new 6.x
release, with two offering to help make a new release happen.
A couple of others showed interest in
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Andi Vajda wrote:
Thank you Jan for starting this thread !
Of the nine people that responded, three were interested in a new 6.x
release, with two offering to help make a new release happen.
A couple of others showed interest in JCC only.
Here is what I can propose:
1
Hi,
(Sorry, just joined the list and so I'm unable to use a "real reply" in
my mail client)
As for my company, our answers are:
[X] Still mostly happy with the 3.6 release, planning to upgrade to 4.x
some time in future (please don't ask when, also requires a lot of
changes in our product).
Thank you Jan for starting this thread !
Of the nine people that responded, three were interested in a new 6.x
release, with two offering to help make a new release happen.
A couple of others showed interest in JCC only.
Here is what I can propose:
1. I can make sure a PyLucene can be buil
[X] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help!
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Alexander Yaworsky
> wrote:
>
> Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally
> long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story). Here's my
> opinion, as a user. 1. Be in
Hi,
I'm a user of JCC only. I would like to see a python-3 version but I do not
have the skills / time to do it myself unfortunately. I can help in testing.
I have looked at other alternative for JCC but none seems to provide the
integration such well, the "import" statement also is difficult in
No, it wouldn't.I haven't tried py4j, just looked at docs and the key
word I see is 'dynamic'. We used dynamic wrappers (I don't remember
exact names, that was too long ago, but the problem using JNI that way
is poor performance. JCC, in contrast, generates wrappers that provide
outstanding perform
Would it make more sense to move to py4j like spark uses. JCC is awesome
tech but installing it is a pain
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, at 09:35 AM, Alexander Yaworsky wrote:
> Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally
> long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story).
Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally
long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story). Here's my
opinion, as a user. 1. Be in sync with lucene is a must. 2. Be in sync
with python is a must. Therefore,
> Question: What should happen to PyLucene now?
>
> [ ]
[x] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases
With emphasis on the "happy" part. Not meant to be discouraging in any way.
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 06:12, Joe Cabrera wrote:
>
> [X] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help!
The tests need porting :-)
Andi..
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Dirk Rothe wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.07.2016, 11:32 Uhr, schrieb Jan Høydahl :
>>
>> Hi
>>>
>>> As you all know
On 1/07/2016 11:32, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Hi
As you all know not much has happened with PyLucene lately.
So I’m throwing out this poll to check the sentiment of the community.
Question: What should happen to PyLucene now?
[ ] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases
[X] P
[X] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help!
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Dirk Rothe wrote:
> Am 01.07.2016, 11:32 Uhr, schrieb Jan Høydahl :
>
> Hi
>>
>> As you all know not much has happened with PyLucene lately.
>> So I’m throwing out this poll to check the sentiment of th
Am 01.07.2016, 11:32 Uhr, schrieb Jan Høydahl :
Hi
As you all know not much has happened with PyLucene lately.
So I’m throwing out this poll to check the sentiment of the community.
Question: What should happen to PyLucene now?
[X] Still mostly happy with the 3.6 release, pondering for at le
Hello :)
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 11:32 AM
To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [POLL] What should happen to PyLucene now?
Hi
As you all know not much has happened with PyLucene lately.
So I’m throwing out
Hi
As you all know not much has happened with PyLucene lately.
So I’m throwing out this poll to check the sentiment of the community.
Question: What should happen to PyLucene now?
[ ] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases
[ ] Please, a new 6.x release (but I can’t contr
18 matches
Mail list logo
