[pypy-dev] Msgspec Compatibility - would this be possible?

be supported by pypy? Regards, Phyo. On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 3:20 PM Phyo Arkar Lwin wrote: > Unfortunately https://github.com/jcrist/msgspec/issues/22 , it dosen't > support pypy. > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 2:56 PM Phyo Arkar Lwin > wrote: > >> I had tried , and it

[pypy-dev] Re: v7.3.12 has been released

Unfortunately https://github.com/jcrist/msgspec/issues/22 , it dosen't support pypy. On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 2:56 PM Phyo Arkar Lwin wrote: > I had tried , and it fails at msgspec dependency - which is build using > gcc . I had opened a bug in their repo but it is working fine

[pypy-dev] Re: v7.3.12 has been released

I had tried , and it fails at msgspec dependency - which is build using gcc . I had opened a bug in their repo but it is working fine on cpython. https://github.com/jcrist/msgspec/issues/443 On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:43 PM Phyo Arkar Lwin wrote: > Thanks a lot , i haven't tried with py

[pypy-dev] Re: v7.3.12 has been released

Thanks a lot , i haven't tried with pypy with litestar 2.0-dev which we have moved to msgpack. I will test it this evening and let you know. On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:26 PM Matti Picus wrote: > On 16/6/23 09:50, Phyo Arkar Lwin wrote: > > > Hi guys , grats! > > Long

[pypy-dev] Re: v7.3.12 has been released

Hi guys , grats! Long time i haven't use pypy. Question , does pypy support pyo3 now ? There are a lot of rust-python binded libs now and i cannot use them , when i tried last year. I am contribution to development of litestar framework which use rusted python libs , which i coin't get pypy to run

[pypy-dev] Re: CFFI docs

How about HPY : https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy I think it is the best route currently? On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:39 AM Alex Martelli via pypy-dev < pypy-dev@python.org> wrote: > Hi Maciej, Armin, et al! > > Together with co-authors I've CC'd, I'm getting close to finishing the 4th > edition

Re: [pypy-dev] Making PyPy relevant

PyPy version is moving up version a lot faster than before. And Pypy 3.8 is mainstream in most development houses and enterprise. It seems P do not People rarely using latest python version But i agree on point that PyPy need to grow its userbase. Many of the people i talked with still think pypy C

[pypy-dev] Microsoft is hirign to speed up python , they just need to support this project here.

Hello PyPy, I think you guys need to talk to them. It seems GVR forgets existence of pypy. https://twitter.com/gvanrossum/status/1402756021358006272?s=19 ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Feedback on pypy.org website revamp

- old logo is better - looks really great on mobile too. - color theme looks too facebookish - overalk huge thumbs up On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 7:56 PM Antonio Cuni wrote: > I agree, I like the old logo better. > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ronan Lamy wrote: > >> Do we really need a new logo?

Re: [pypy-dev] Suggestion : Build Using PyPy page to showcase.

Thanks, any plans for showcase site? We can build one, if you need help. On Jun 13, 2017 11:33 PM, "Maciej Fijalkowski" wrote: > Hey Phyo > > Good job, thanks for the feedback! > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Phyo Arkar > wrote: > > We had launched our

[pypy-dev] Suggestion : Build Using PyPy page to showcase.

We had launched our chat-room for medical consultation , in our country. It is reaching 5000 users in first month and growing fast with 400 concurrent user max , daily. We need a page to showcase projects running 100% on pypy runtime! Regards Phyo. ___

Re: [pypy-dev] 2, 7 and 3.5 release is almost here - please help check you favorite platform

I want to mean if there any Significant performance difference between Pypy 2.7x and 3.5x On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:38 PM Phyo Arkar wrote: > I am so excited to jump to 3.5x , thanks a lot guys. > Any significant difference compare to 2.7x or features not passing tests ? > > On Fri,

Re: [pypy-dev] 2, 7 and 3.5 release is almost here - please help check you favorite platform

I am so excited to jump to 3.5x , thanks a lot guys. Any significant difference compare to 2.7x or features not passing tests ? On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 AM Matti Picus wrote: > On 23/03/17 12:46, Armin Rigo wrote: > > > Hi Phyo, > > > > On 21 March 2017 at

Re: [pypy-dev] 5.7.1 bug fix release

So i read , the 3.5 version is still considered beta? What are missing / known issue for 3.5 now ? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:14 PM Gelin Yan wrote: > Hi Matti > >Thanks. The website is still pointing to 5.7.0 > > Regards > > gelin yan > ___ > pypy-d

Re: [pypy-dev] 2, 7 and 3.5 release is almost here - please help check you favorite platform

Teating. Saw warning that it is much slower than pypy2? How much slower? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017, 02:17 Matti Picus wrote: > The release is almost ready. Please check the website for obvious typos, > > http://pypy.org/download.html (note I fixed a typo in the hashsum titles > in 536afa5d31cf ) > >

Re: [pypy-dev] revisit web assembly?

Very intersting! I can't wait to write Javascript in python. On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 6:15 AM Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > I just found that: > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00044.html > > It might be cool to see, maybe we can relatively easily compile to the > web platform. Even in

Re: [pypy-dev] Speeds of various utf8 operations

SSE measn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_SIMD_Extensions? in comparison to CPython is this much slower ? On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Hello everyone > > I've been experimenting a bit with faster utf8 operations (and > conversion that does not do much). I'

Re: [pypy-dev] Pandas on PyPy

Hi See this : https://morepypy.blogspot.com/2016/11/pypy27-v56-released-stdlib-2712-support.html On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:38 AM Singh, Yashwardhan < yashwardhan.si...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I was hoping to use Pandas with PyPy to speed up applications, but ran > into compatibility

Re: [pypy-dev] GIL

Continuation of PyPy-STM dev. On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:41 PM Phyo Arkar wrote: > Currenly focus is on PyPy3.5 right? will there be continuation of > development after PyPy3.5? > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:59 PM Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Sebastian K

Re: [pypy-dev] GIL

Currenly focus is on PyPy3.5 right? will there be continuation of development after PyPy3.5? On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:59 PM Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Sebastian K via pypy-dev wrote: > > > can someone explain me why pypy needs the gil? In CPython the main > > reason is the re

Re: [pypy-dev] GIL

Please check PyPy-STM http://doc.pypy.org/en/latest/stm.html On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:43 PM Sebastian K via pypy-dev < pypy-dev@python.org> wrote: > Hello everbody, > > can someone explain me why pypy needs the gil? In CPython the main reason > is the reference counting but pypy doesnt use refe

Re: [pypy-dev] 3.6?

Thank you very much on working towards 3.5 guys. As users we can forget about 3.6 for now since 3.5 gives a lot of improvment that most of us are looking for (asyn await and co ). Would like to see it released soon , PyPy 3.5 is only thing we are waiting , to move forward from python 2.7.x On Sun

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy3.3 release

Richard , thank you very much for moving directly to 3.5! On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:22 PM Richard Plangger wrote: > Hello, > > I have prepared an alpha release for the python 3.3 branching from the > py3k branch. As far as I understood this means that the development will > now continue towards p

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy segfault while playing around with odoo.

.10 pyusb==1.0.0b2 qrcode==5.1 reportlab==3.1.44 requests==2.6.0 six==1.9.0 suds-jurko==0.6 vatnumber==1.2 vobject==0.6.6 wsgiref==0.1.2 xlwt==0.7.5 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:25 PM Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Phyo, > > On 16 August 2016 at 20:06, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > But i got to a s

[pypy-dev] pypy segfault while playing around with odoo.

Hello Pypy team. i am using latest pypy , to try odoo with pypy , to see if it is compatible enough now . it fails while compliling gevent and pyscopg but i switched them to gevent>=1.1 psycopg2cffi>=2.5.4 . that get it going to the point that odoo able to run. But i got to a stop when creating n

Re: [pypy-dev] jetbrains vulnerability and py3k money

WOW , Wow!! Pypy3k coming!! Time to swtich to Python3 totally. Please Quick push forward 3.5 guys!! On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:41 AM Alex Gaynor wrote: > Cool! > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski > wrote: > >> So apparently someone just made a big donation to pypy 3k project

[pypy-dev] Microsoft is starting its own JIT for Python.

Hello PyPy Team; I guess you guys already known. Microsft is starting its own pypy : https://github.com/Microsoft/Pyjion The main reason they mention there is due to weak CPyext support but It is just duplicating work, as you guys are already working on it . Shouldn't microsoft contribute into C

Re: [pypy-dev] integration with java

sorry i just mean it as a joke. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 6:17 PM Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Phyo, > > On 15 July 2016 at 15:58, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > For most python programmers we stay away from Java as much as possible. > We > > are allergic to it. > > That'

Re: [pypy-dev] integration with java

if you want python that works well with Android , check Kivy.org For most python programmers we stay away from Java as much as possible. We are allergic to it. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:30 PM Andrey Rubik wrote: > Hi > Ok, thank you for answer. I look at the jython. > > -- > Best Regards, > An

Re: [pypy-dev] fix libpypy-c.so needing certein versions

Here is portable pypy. https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy You can just use it by directly unzipping and running it. it comes with a virtual-env directly too. Regards, Phyo. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:00 PM William ML Leslie < william.leslie@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 June 2016 at 1

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy2 v5.3.0 released, help us get the word out

Nice to see nim guys on PyPy too , Kirbyfan! On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:09 AM Ryan Gonzalez wrote: > Posted to /r/programming! > > -- > Ryan > [ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your > program. Something’s wrong. > http://kirbyfan64.github.io/ > On Jun 8, 2016 2:53 PM,

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy2 v5.3.0 released, help us get the word out

WOW!! Thank you veryy veryy much on keeping working on cpyext!! On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:25 AM Matti Picus wrote: > And this time in plain text not html > > > https://morepypy.blogspot.co.il/2016/06/pypy2-v53-released-major-c-extension.html > This is the culmination of ~6 months of teamwork to g

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy3.3-v5.2-alpha1 release

Thanks a lot for continuing development of pypy 3.3. can't wait for pypy 3.5 On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:10 PM Konstantin Lopuhin wrote: > Ah, sorry, my bad: I did not know about ensurepip module, checked if > after reading the blog post, and it works: it installs pip and "python > -m pip" works

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy & Django: recommended mySQL module?

try pymysql ?purepython mysql client https://github.com/PyMySQL/PyMySQL it works much faster than mysqlpython back when i used mysql. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:23 PM Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > > On Sun, 8 May 2016, Maciej Fijalkowski wro

Re: [pypy-dev] 5.1 has been released

I would like to help , i can get Two Interns who love python a lot . But cpyext needs C skills , right? On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:34 AM Matti Picus wrote: > On 22/04/16 07:02, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > Congrats PyPy Team! > > It keeps getting better and better! > > And th

Re: [pypy-dev] release seems ready

I am going to test it out , quite interesting release. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:12 PM Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > yay! > > can we call it rc1? if noone objects we'll make rc1 the release say in 24 > or 48h > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:49 PM, matti picus wrote: > > It seems we have a release, v

[pypy-dev] More Push towards Python 3.x?

Pypy, Python 3.x is lagging behind a lot. Python 3.5 is a version we should be Evolving to so Is there any planned timeline for Pypy Python 3.x ? ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Current status of GUI support in PyPy

Rapydscript is pure pythonic javascript. HTML5 + http://www.pyjeon.com/rapydscript On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote: > I find HTML5 overkill if you're not using JS... > > > On December 18, 2015 7:52:40 AM CST, Phyo Arkar > wrote: >> >> B

Re: [pypy-dev] Current status of GUI support in PyPy

Best GUI for every language these days is HTML5. Use PyPy as backend process , and use HTML5 as UI. Check out Electron .http://electron.atom.io/ HTML5 Desktop UI that powers Atom editor. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > After a casual bit of googling I'm not sure what i

Re: [pypy-dev] Performance regression from 2.6.1 to 4.0.0 ?

can you try with latest master? On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Tobias Oberstein < tobias.oberst...@tavendo.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some measurements comparing JSON and MsgPack > serialization/deserialization performance > > https://github.com/oberstet/scratchbox/tree/master/python/serper

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

yeah , that sounds weird. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Alexander Walters wrote: > PyPy3 4.0.0 > > > On 10/26/2015 02:47, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > PyPy 4.0.0 sounds a lot better but how we will name newer versions of > PyPy3 ? > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Alex

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

PyPy 4.0.0 sounds a lot better but how we will name newer versions of PyPy3 ? On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Alexander Walters wrote: > On 10/20/2015 19:09, Matti Picus wrote: > >> After a short discussion on IRC, it turns out this is the popular view, >> so the next release wll be called PyPy

Re: [pypy-dev] Any Release incoming for pypy 3.x?

? >> >> It might be time for another release of the 3.2 version with an >> upgraded cffi among other things from the default branch (which should >> be less work than finishing 3.3 support). >> >> -- >> Philip Jenvey >> >> On Oct 20, 20

Re: [pypy-dev] Any Release incoming for pypy 3.x?

ust an updated version of >> the 3.2 compatible pypy3? >> >> It might be time for another release of the 3.2 version with an >> upgraded cffi among other things from the default branch (which should >> be less work than finishing 3.3 support). >> >> -- &g

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

Just make a pypy that automatically compatible between python2 nd 3 and name it pyoy5 :P I know it is not feasible. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, 5:40 AM Matti Picus wrote: > On 21/10/15 00:48, Antonio Cuni wrote: > > why using yy.mm instead of just a single increasing int > > number li

[pypy-dev] Any Release incoming for pypy 3.x?

I am waiting to switch to Python3 , but i am not switching without pypy3 moving forward ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Any Release incoming for pypy 3.x?

Any progress in it? On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > I am waiting to switch to Python3 , but i am not switching without pypy3 > moving forward > ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

Lol I C. I was thinking that way. How abt also adding code names? I can come up with fun ones. On Oct 17, 2015 3:28 PM, "Armin Rigo" wrote: > Hi Phyo, > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Phyo Arkar > wrote: > > So that will work like 15.11 , 15.5 ? something like

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

warmup time improvement of 20% or so at the cost of a minor regression in jitted code speed. 20% Warmup is huge! That will skyrocket in bencmarks. But Minor regression? how minor ? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > So that will work like 15.11 , 15.5 ? something like t

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 15.11 release is imminent

So that will work like 15.11 , 15.5 ? something like that? Predefined release cycle ? And Awesome work Guys!@ On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Matti Picus wrote: > I have started a major release cycle, and consensus was to start a new > numbering scheme, based on yy.mm > > While every release

Re: [pypy-dev] About gurobipy

. Fixing them is just a matter of using with statement or manually closing . On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Vasily Evseenko wrote: > Hi, > Could you explain about closed file objects (do you mean open file > descriptors)? > I've never heard about this restriction before. > >

Re: [pypy-dev] About gurobipy

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Luis José Novoa wrote: > gurobipy Never heard of it. Here are things PyPy Can help: - If it is Pure Python - If CExtensions are with CFFI - If file objects (if any) are closed PyPy will work fine and you can expect average 7x performance gain , up to 20-30x.

[pypy-dev] Trying to support PyPy on PyAV

Mike Boers is trying to support PyAV (python Audio Video editing/merging/converting library based on FFMPEG) . The current master fails 6 of the unit tests: - 4 of them are in __repr__ methods, and seem to be due to basic difference in module name handling. - 1 is with Numpy; I expect th

Re: [pypy-dev] State of GUI toolkits with PyPy?

With this stack , It works on every platform that pypy works. Also possible for mobile UI On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > Use Electron + RapydScript on client side , along with bootstrap or > Material Design Light . https://github.com/atsepkov/RapydScript > >

Re: [pypy-dev] State of GUI toolkits with PyPy?

Use Electron + RapydScript on client side , along with bootstrap or Material Design Light . https://github.com/atsepkov/RapydScript And use PyPy on backend. you got everything done in python. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Hi Eric > > There has been some success w

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy 2.6 memory leak bug!! very importent

If you can show as a sample code it will be better. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:29 PM, 于大伟 wrote: > hi, > i use pypy 2.6 with BeautifulSoup module and pymongo. i make a spider > with the pypy. > when i run pypy ,i found a problem ,the pypy use memory higher then 6GB > when i run pypy at once

Re: [pypy-dev] use as benchmark pypy vs python if you please

Forgot to add , they are different code and there is no Set operation , so might not be related. ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] use as benchmark pypy vs python if you please

i am just testing a n_queen solver, yesterday with 2.6.1 vs Nodejs. The code i tested is from https://github.com/chaddotson/puzzles But pypy is much faster as nqueen grows . And it is 40% faster than nodejs. In smaller numbers < 10 it is slower but it has to do with JIT Warmup right? (pypy-cu

Re: [pypy-dev] 2.6.1 release cycle has begun

ah i c On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > I don't think so, our 3.x releases are usually done at different times > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Phyo Arkar > wrote: > > Will there be any 3.x r

Re: [pypy-dev] 2.6.1 release cycle has begun

Will there be any 3.x release included in this? ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] 2.6.1 release cycle has begun

How is python 3.4 release coming?. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Matti Picus > wrote: > > On 19/08/15 22:54, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > >> > >> I fixed a few bugs, I will write a parser for vmmap tomorrow > >> Maciej Fijalkowski >

Re: [pypy-dev] For Donations, List How Much is Left (or Spent)?

Anything new on this Pypy 3.x move? On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > I can help you to iron out issue tomorrow I guess? > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc > wrote: > > 2015-06-25 9:11 GMT+02:00 Armin Rigo : > >> > >> Hi Amaury, > >> > >> On 25

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy-2.3.1 memory profiling strategies

Memory handling is improved on 2.6.1 , theres no memory leak there. we running for 2 months already. You gotta upgrade. On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:51 PM, jim horng wrote: > Hi all, > Not sure if it's appropriate to post here since there's no pypy-user group > :) > My question is as title, we got

[pypy-dev] Can we announce What we've build using pypy on this list?

We have built an addictive Team communication platform using python and server side is purely running on pypy! Can I announce on this mailing list? ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Increase the default stack limit

I am sure it is fine for most modern linux distros . On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > should improve the default limit by +-4x > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Phyo Arkar > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Macie

Re: [pypy-dev] Increase the default stack limit

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > stack limit That will help alot with recursions? ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] For Donations, List How Much is Left (or Spent)?

What do you guys think about skipping directly to pythin 3.5 and release it in-time when it releases? On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Donald, hi everybody, > > On 1 June 2015 at 22:00, Donald Stufft wrote: > > So out of someone complaining about PyPy's lack of an up to da

Re: [pypy-dev] Question

use easy_install On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Ram Rachum wrote: > I tried that now. It wouldn't run `get-pip.py`. Says "Could not find a > version that satisfies the requirement pip (from versions: ) > No matching distribution found for pip" > > On Thu, Jun 11

Re: [pypy-dev] Question

It is just Download , extract , Run, and have fun. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > Have you tried portable pypy ? https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy > it works for me , in every linuxes. > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Ram Rachum wrote: > >

Re: [pypy-dev] Question

Have you tried portable pypy ? https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy it works for me , in every linuxes. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Ram Rachum wrote: > When you use the ppa, where will nosetests be located? > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote: > >> sudo add-apt

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.6.0 release binaries available

> On May 27, 2015 8:52:46 AM CDT, Phyo Arkar > wrote: >> >> Congrats! i love that pypy releases are getting faster and faster! >> i haven't even upgrade to 2.5.1 yet in my systems, 2.6 is relased. Time >> to try it out now and upgrade this one. >> >> On

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.6.0 release binaries available

Congrats! i love that pypy releases are getting faster and faster! i haven't even upgrade to 2.5.1 yet in my systems, 2.6 is relased. Time to try it out now and upgrade this one. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Matti, > > On 26 May 2015 at 22:19, Matti Picus wrote: > > T

Re: [pypy-dev] Build pypy 2.5.1 source code on Redhat EL5.7

ofcoz , it is an opensource project. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 10:59 +0800, Yicong Huang wrote: > > > > Could you please provide the document on how to build the portable > > version? > > Have a look at the last section of the readme in the po

Re: [pypy-dev] Build pypy 2.5.1 source code on Redhat EL5.7

https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy On May 8, 2015 9:23 PM, "Phyo Arkar" wrote: > can you try with portable pypy ? > Hi, > > We would like to try latest pypy 2.5.1. > However, we found out the downloaded binary was not compatible with our > Linux enviroment

Re: [pypy-dev] Build pypy 2.5.1 source code on Redhat EL5.7

can you try with portable pypy ? Hi, We would like to try latest pypy 2.5.1. However, we found out the downloaded binary was not compatible with our Linux enviroment (Redhat EL5.7, kernel 2.6.32). And for some reasons, we have no plans to upgrade Linux soon. I tried to build pypy 2.5.1 source code

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.5.1 is live, please help get the word out

For those linux pypy users who have trouble with dependencies to openssl/etc : use https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy# its most portable of all and developer updates it frequently. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Matti Picus wrote: > Tell your friends, your employer, your employees.

Re: [pypy-dev] could it be that cpyext is faster than python + cffi?

Very interesting. If that really working it will be game changer. Can it build Scipy, scikit-learn, matplotlib now? Pandas already working i think. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Matti Picus wrote: > I am close to releasing a blog post about numpy.linalg > > https://gist.github.com/mattip/25680

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy3 2.4.0 released

Thanks a lot for the benchmarks. So we still have to wait , i guess. Would be nice a blogpost with PyPy 2 vs PyPy3 vs CPython 2 and 3. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Philip Jenvey wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > >> Congrats! >> I am using

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy3 2.4.0 released

Congrats! I am using Pypy 2.4 for tornado based web development , performance improvement is the real deal there. i am waiting to switch to python3 and its becoming near! Its when pypy3 3.4 is ready (ie , Python3 is only starting to interesting after 3.4.x due to asyncio module) . I have a questi

Re: [pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

Thanks a lot for the explanation Armin Rigo. > PyPy to be in the same > ballpark performance as V8 Since Debian shootout no longer includes pypy we do not know where to look for good benchmarks, so I had to look at TechEmpower benchmark. Its my fault for looking at TechEmpower benchmark and not r

Re: [pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

Right, I just realize that. There using plain HHVM vs All other Frameworks , not even fair. Only thing that is not framework is Node.js there. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote: >>uwsgi+pypy outperforms tornado + pypy by > quite a large margin (I hit client limits wh

Re: [pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

>uwsgi+pypy outperforms tornado + pypy by quite a large margin (I hit client limits when trying) Very interesting , i got to try uwsgi+pypy-tornado combo. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > sorry guys , i forgot to mention i was talking about TechEmpower > benchm

Re: [pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

sorry guys , i forgot to mention i was talking about TechEmpower benchmarks. Not Debian shootout. I haven;t check there yet. But i think Techempower case is a bit more real world? but only covering web+database benchmarks tho. ___ pypy-dev mailing list p

Re: [pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r9&hw=peak&test=query Sorry , this benchmark game i meant :D On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > bah. > > Did you notice that pypy is not even in the benchmark game? > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014

[pypy-dev] Will pypy reach performance of HHVM?(one Day)

I am wondering, is it theoretically possible to reach performance of HHVM? >From benchmark game , it is the highest performance of all the dynamic languages. ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy Benchmark of Tornado.

esult >> to a unique Request, you’re going to need to tag it appropriately. I prefer >> to use dictionaries and the callback attribute handed to me by gen.Task and >> pass a unique-enough key to C to callback in with. >> >> As with everything in optimization, profile your

Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy Benchmark of Tornado.

e very appreciated. > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Jolitz Ben - bjolit > wrote: >> >> I use Tornado and have found PyPy can yield a 30-50% performance increase >> for a moderately complex project. >> >> Ben >> >> From: Phyo Arkar >

Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy Benchmark of Tornado.

, Jolitz Ben - bjolit wrote: > I use Tornado and have found PyPy can yield a 30-50% performance > increase for a moderately complex project. > > Ben > > From: Phyo Arkar > Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 at 8:21 AM > To: pypy-dev > Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy Be

Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy Benchmark of Tornado.

I expect pypy to be faster in those cases but select io is not cpu intensive thing to do so no real benefit using pypy here i guess. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > It just return json document with a few thousand characters (1053 bytes) > $siege -c 400 -t 20s -r

[pypy-dev] Pypy Benchmark of Tornado.

It just return json document with a few thousand characters (1053 bytes) $siege -c 400 -t 20s -r 2000 http://localhost:/js Python 2.7.7: Lifting the server siege... done. Transactions: 14478 hits Availability: 100.00 % Elapsed time: 19.

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy 2.3.1 json encoding performnce is Extremely slow (30x slower ).

Very nice. Pypy is the future. On Sep 1, 2014 10:25 PM, "Armin Rigo" wrote: > Hi, > > On 1 September 2014 17:06, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > Thanks a lot. I haven't get to test lastest commit yet. > > So in that , attached benchmark in pypy is running faster than

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy 2.3.1 json encoding performnce is Extremely slow (30x slower ).

Thanks a lot. I haven't get to test lastest commit yet. So in that , attached benchmark in pypy is running faster than python now? On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Re-hi, > > On 1 September 2014 12:20, Armin Rigo wrote: >> Tweaked! > > Note that the final result is 33% faster

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy 2.3.1 json encoding performnce is Extremely slow (30x slower ).

Thanks a lot! i am waiting to switch to PyPy. Also there is one performance problem. I haven't profile it properly yet just from looking at Chrome DEV Console. A simple Tornado async (callback) + pymongo + motor + reading 100 records from db and returning them in json , in Python its takes only 1

[pypy-dev] pypy 2.3.1 json encoding performnce is Extremely slow (30x slower ).

$ pypy benchmark.py Array with 256 doubles: json encode : 5044.67291 calls/sec json decode : 19591.44018 calls/sec Array with 256 utf-8 strings: json decode UTF : 71.03748 calls/sec json decode UTF : 482.03748 calls/sec $ /usr/bin/pyt

Re: [pypy-dev] blist, was Re: pypy-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 5

or write CFFI version? On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Nathan Hurst wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:32:39AM +, cuitao wrote: > > hello, can you consider adding the blist support in pypy ? > > blist: a list-like type with better asymptotic performance and similar > performance on small l

Re: [pypy-dev] uWSGI 1.9.11 released with PyPy support

wow good job roberto and pypy team. that will surely increase adoption of pypy. so zeromq working in pypy now too? On May 26, 2013 1:26 PM, "Roberto De Ioris" wrote: > > Hi everyone, thanks to the effort of Maciej Fijalkowski (and contributions > of Alex Gaynor and Armin Rigo) we now have a fully

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.0 - Einstein Sandwich

it used to work fine before. its not problem i can build from source. On May 11, 2013 3:26 AM, "Armin Rigo" wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Phyo Arkar > wrote: > > ./bin/pypy: error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: cannot > open

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.0 - Einstein Sandwich

just did that. got ELF header error @ /usr/lib64/libtinfo.so.5 On May 10, 2013 9:32 PM, "Phyo Arkar" wrote: > Ah that's why i cannot find libtinfo.so > thanks i will try that. > On May 10, 2013 9:25 PM, wrote: > >> Phyo, >> >> On Fri, 10 May 201

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.0 - Einstein Sandwich

Ah that's why i cannot find libtinfo.so thanks i will try that. On May 10, 2013 9:25 PM, wrote: > Phyo, > > On Fri, 10 May 2013, Phyo Arkar wrote: > >> ./bin/pypy: error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: cannot >> open shared object file: No such file

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy 2.0 - Einstein Sandwich

Sabayon Linux64bit i am not sure i tested 1.9 on this laptop On May 10, 2013 8:37 PM, "Amaury Forgeot d'Arc" wrote: > > 2013/5/10 Phyo Arkar > >> Unfortunately there is a dependency on libtinfo.so : >> >> ./bin/pypy: error while loading shared libra

  1   2   >