On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> Thanks for the nice explanation. I find interesting that english, being
> so used to interchange verbs, adjetives and nouns, is so picky here :).
I have a T-shirt that says "English doesn't borrow from other
languages. English follows other lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/11 21:44, Terry Reedy wrote:
> This mistake, which I have seen before, has an understandable reason.
> 'Precise' is derived (borrowed) from the French "pre'cis" which is at
Thanks for the nice explanation. I find interesting that english, bei
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> For the benefit of people who are not native-English speakers and who
>> wish to write literate English: The English word 'precise' is only an
>> adjective, and not a verb, so the above does not work as an English
>> sentence.
>>
I find
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> Ok, I've found a later message:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/090959.html
>
This post precedes the creation of py3k-datetime branch, so no wonder
that it was not mentioned. I wonder, though why sandbox was no
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 18:25 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> ..
> > A quick search found the following message by Dirkjan, but it is likely
> > earlier messages on the subject had been posted too:
> > http://mail.python.org/piperma
> For the benefit of people who are not native-English speakers and who
> wish to write literate English: The English word 'precise' is only an
> adjective, and not a verb, so the above does not work as an English
> sentence.
>
> This mistake, which I have seen before, has an understandable reason
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> A quick search found the following message by Dirkjan, but it is likely
> earlier messages on the subject had been posted too:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-July/090325.html
>
No wonder I missed that. I assume you a
> Regardless, since Alexander's previous work was in the sandbox repo (not
> the python repo), I don't think it would have been possible to integrate
> it during the hg migration.
See the message I just sent - it's *not* a separate repository (else
subversion would not be able to reconstruct the f
> It looks like this history survived the cvs to svn migration, but was
> lost in migration to hg.
It's not there anymore, but it isn't lost, either - you can still get it
from svn if you want to (and should still be able to do so twenty years
from now if you care - just as you can still get the o
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 15:44 -0400, Terry Reedy a écrit :
> > Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where
>
> For the benefit of people who are not native-English speakers and who
> wish to write literate English: The English word 'precise' is only an
> adjective, an
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 17:43 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:00:21 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > ..
> > > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> > > (feature bran
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:00:21 -0400, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> ..
> > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> > (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if
> > Alexander's changese
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
> All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches
> (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if
> Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where
> they were made in the S
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Can you be more precise? How did you do that?
>
> See the example that he gave, e.g. r82065. The changes are in
> /sandbox/branches/py3k-datetime.
Martin mostly answered Antoine's question for me.You can get more
details by comparin
Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where
For the benefit of people who are not native-English speakers and who
wish to write literate English: The English word 'precise' is only an
adjective, and not a verb, so the above does not work as an English
sentence.
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I propose that the redirector (hg.../lookup) redirects to the subversion
> viewer if it can't find a matching hg revision.
That sounds like an extremely user-friendly solution.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden
st...@holdenweb.com
_
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 14:29 -0400, Steve Holden a écrit :
>>
>> Great advice for the future, Antoine. Now can you help with the Hg
>> issue?
>
> As far as I understand it, this is not so much an hg issue than a
> migration issue.
>
>> I ha
> Can you be more precise? How did you do that?
See the example that he gave, e.g. r82065. The changes are in
/sandbox/branches/py3k-datetime.
>> However, hg log of this file starts with my commit about a year ago.
>> Is it possible to re-add the old history?
>
> We cannot "add" any past history
Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 14:29 -0400, Steve Holden a écrit :
>
> Great advice for the future, Antoine. Now can you help with the Hg
> issue?
As far as I understand it, this is not so much an hg issue than a
migration issue.
> I had understood that *all* history was going to be retained. Did I
>
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> The history of datetime.py
>> is very helpful for understanding various design decisions implemented
>> in that module.
>
> I would advise to document design decisions in source code comments or
> in a separate file. Having to dig in VCS logs,
Sorry, reply initially sent off-list.
Message transféré
De: Antoine Pitrou
À: Alexander Belopolsky
Sujet: Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:58:50 +0200
> When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was don
I am not sure where to report such issues, so I'll post it here.
Please advise if another list is more appropriate.
When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was done
in a way that preserved the history of that file going back to 2002.
However, hg log of this file starts with my
22 matches
Mail list logo
