On Jan 01, 2013, at 09:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>Yes, I think lost contributor agreements have already happened.
In fact, my original one was lost. I submitted a new one a few Pycons back.
-Barry
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committe
Le mardi 01 janvier 2013 à 23:39 +0100, Charles-François Natali a
écrit :
> Am I the only one feeling uncomfortable about having such a discussion
> take place on a public mailing list?
> I mean, we're debating whether to ban him from the tracker/mailing
> lists, but to me, this whole thread is muc
On 1 Jan 2013, at 22:39, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Am I the only one feeling uncomfortable about having such a discussion
> take place on a public mailing list?
> I mean, we're debating whether to ban him from the tracker/mailing
> lists, but to me, this whole thread is much more harmful
Am I the only one feeling uncomfortable about having such a discussion
take place on a public mailing list?
I mean, we're debating whether to ban him from the tracker/mailing
lists, but to me, this whole thread is much more harmful than any
other action we could take.
Imagine what will happen when
One note on the CLA issue - Allison Randall spent some time discussing the
CLA in person with Anatoly at the PyCon US 2011 sprints, so he may have
signed it then.
As I understand it, the CLA itself gives the PSF the rights it needs to
redistribute under a different licence, while the accompanying
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> I still don't understand the CA issue: either he sent one some months back,
> and it got lost: then he can re-submit it.
Apparently he did and it got lost, and I hope he will resubmit it again now.
> Or he thinks there is something
> wron
On Jan 1, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
On 01/01/2013 11:13 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>>
I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he t
Hello,
Le mardi 01 janvier 2013 à 15:55 -0600, Brian Curtin a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> >>
> >>> I say Ezio lets him know that this is
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>
>>> I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he talked to him
>>> recently and is in the no-ban-yet camp.
>>>
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
>> I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he talked to him
>> recently and is in the no-ban-yet camp.
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I talked to him, informed him about the probation
On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> I say Ezio lets him know that this is the plan since he talked to him
> recently and is in the no-ban-yet camp.
>
>
> Yesterday I talked to him, informed him about the probation and showed him
> this
> message. I hope this is official enoug
Hi Ezio,
Le mardi 01 janvier 2013 à 18:54 +0200, Ezio Melotti a écrit :
>
> We also discussed about the contributor agreement and IIUC:
>
> 1) he signed it already 1.5 years ago but apparently it got lost
> (that wouldn't be too surprising if it really happened);
Yes, I think lost contributor
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> [...]
> I sent it to a lawyer. Note the CLA was designed by PSF legal counsel, to
> whom I have sent this thread.
>
Thanks for doing that!
> If he signed it 1.5 years ago, the CLA has not changed. Ergo, I fail to see
> what the issue is today
On Jan 1, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> We also discussed about the contributor agreement and IIUC:
>>> 1) he signed it already 1.5 years
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> We also discussed about the contributor agreement and IIUC:
> 1) he signed it already 1.5 years ago but apparently it got lost (that
> wouldn't be too surprising if
On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> [...]
>> In order to deal with this, here is my proposal that should placate those of
>> us calling for a ban now and those that feel like there has not been enough
>> of a war
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> [...]
> In order to deal with this, here is my proposal that should placate those
> of us calling for a ban now and those that feel like there has not been
> enough of a warning ((I can't communicate with him because I want him
> banned
19 matches
Mail list logo
