On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
When PEP 450 (the statistics module) was accepted, it looks like we
missed the step of granting Steven commit access for module
maintenance purposes. We should probably fix that :)
I'm happy to handle the task of bringing
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Am 25.01.2014 14:09, schrieb Larry Hastings:
I'd like to extend the Derby by two more weeks and add a fourth beta.
In the past I did like the way how accurate the releases were planned and
didn't
slip at all, or only
Interesting. Chromium has something kind-of similar, named commit queue,
for developers without actual commit access. Once they get an LGTM, the
thing rolls automatically. In fact, core developers often find it useful
too because the Chromium tree is sometimes closed (red). We don't really
do the
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:13 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.comwrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:59:19 -0800, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Eli Bendersky eli
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On mer., 2014-01-08 at 12:06 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'm saying hacking in a complex change in a few weeks when there isn't
consensus even on the basics of the design just because a few
moderately high profile
Hello,
Does it really make sense to introduce large amounts of code churn after
the release of 3.4 beta2? It started innocently enough, but now it seems
that the whole implementation is being reconsidered (Antoine's email to
pydev). This doesn't look like something we should be doing so late in
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.comwrote:
2014/1/7 Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com:
Are we really that much in need of convert-to-clinic *now*?
Why not creating the 3.4 branch after the beta1 and develop Python 3.5
in default during the stabilisation
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On mar., 2014-01-07 at 13:18 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
Hello,
Does it really make sense to introduce large amounts of code churn
after the release of 3.4 beta2? It started innocently enough, but now
it seems
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.orgwrote:
Here's another idea. Ban him temporarily from the tracker and the
lists(*) and tell him that to be unbanned he has to talk to me, and to me
only
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With PEP 453 accepted, could Donald please be upgraded to full
committer access for ensurepip maintenance (the initial PEP 453
commits will still go through review on the tracker). (His SSH key is
already on file for PEP
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 08/03/2013 11:22 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
* PEP 435, a standardized enum module
* PEP 442, improved semantics for object finalization
* PEP 443, adding single-dispatch generic functions to the standard library
*
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 08/03/2013 02:08 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Can we, uh, live with that, for alpha 1?
Ned pointed out, signal and zipimport worked on the retry. So it's
sporadic, whatever it is. I think we can live with that.
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Greetings!
I was recently added as a core-dev (yes, saying it still makes me smile ;).
Python is an awesome language and I am happy to be a part of it.
Minor history: I authored PEP 409 (raise ... from None), and
Thanks, Brett!
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Ethan should now have commit rights and be subscribed to this list.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
I'll go ahead and point Ethan to the dev guide, so
:
On 5/8/2013 4:44 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
So I guess I can move forward with this unless there are objections in
the next day or two,
I have not responded before since Guido's approval seems sufficient ;-).
The main concrete step is that one of the repository supervisors add his
access
Hello,
I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored PEP
309, has been very helpful in the Enum saga (and is the de-facto author of
the current reference implementation), and has also been active on the
tracker for a couple of years (username stoneleaf). I think he has
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored PEP
309,
s/309/409/ - sorry for the typo
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:40 PM, serwy roger.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
My name is Roger Serwy and I would like to introduce myself. I am a
graduate student at the University of Illinois in electrical and computer
engineering. Python has been a primary language for my research in
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.comwrote:
It's maybe not the right place to discuss that, but why is IDLE part
of the Python stdlib? Can't we maintain IDLE outside Python? I guess
that maintaining it outside the stdlib would allow to develop it
faster and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.ukwrote:
On 25 Feb 2013, at 20:21, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article
CAP7+vJ+No6yy_kpd6ZTtkNVOK=k95gnms69-rseg-amc+90...@mail.gmail.com,
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I'll try to attend 1-2 days of
Great news to finally have this available!
On Mar 4, 2013 7:30 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
I applaud the foundation for getting an electronic signature method in
place.
However, I have to say that to my mind
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.comwrote:
Is the attendee list for next March's PyCon available to registrants?
What core developers are attending? Maybe members of this list that
are going can reply to this e-mail, or someone more familiar with the
Did anything come of this? There are now a few more threads on
python-ideas that are almost pure Anatoly-instigated noise :P
Back in November, I had asked if anyone had ever given him an
official/explicit warning that he would be kicked out if he continued
certain behavior, and it didn't
Hello,
I had the privilege of joining Google's Mountain View office yesterday, and
was wondering who else from the core development team works there, or in
Google in general (in addition to Guido, of course). It could be great to
meet for lunch now and then and discuss issues of common interest.
Just to be sure, you mean the 3.1.4 will be the last bugfix release? 3.1.5
will
be security fix only? So for example, as Python 2.6, doc updates are no more
accepted in 3.1?
Correct.
That's great. Shorter pull dances for all :)
Eli
___
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:09, Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
added a boolean flag to the bug tracker indicating what user accounts
belong
to committers.
I'm showing as a committer, but not that my contributor
26 matches
Mail list logo
