On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 11:08 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:58:57 -0500, Jesse Noller (mailto:jnol...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > > > My apologies for sounding a sour n
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > My apologies for sounding a sour note, by the way, I think I was unduly
> > influenced by my previous (very poor, from a UI perspective) experience
> > with a system like this, and had a knee-jerk reaction.
> >
> > I think it is gr
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > I applaud the foundation for getting an electronic signature method in
> > place.
> >
> > However, I have to say that to my mind echosign is nothing more than
> > "authentication theater", and I wonder if it is going to make us loo
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
> > I applaud the foundation for getting an electronic signature method in
> > place.
> >
> > However, I have to say that to m
On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 10:24 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I applaud the foundation for getting an electronic signature method in
> place.
>
> However, I have to say that to my mind echosign is nothing more than
> "authentication theater", and I wonder if it is going to make us look
> more
See: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig
Open archives. As the header says this is for the discussion of CLA/other
issues. If specific legal questions or alterations to Python/the PSF
trademarks, CLA/etc are requested those *must* be sent to p...@python.org for
board overs
On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>>
>> Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be
>> compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its ow
I'll be there the entire time. probably not sprinting though. working on
conference things.
On Monday, February 25, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'll try to attend 1-2 days of sprints (and the rest of the
> conference, of course, and the language summit if there is one).
>
> On
On Monday, January 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Several contributor agreement were send last months and wait for accepting.
>
> Ben Morgan (Ben.Morgan) http://bugs.python.org/issue12004
Received by the PSF Admin
> Zack Weinberg (zwol) http://bugs.python.org/issue16624
Not
I just sent email to Ewa, the psf Admin to verify she has copies of these.
On Monday, January 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Several contributor agreement were send last months and wait for accepting.
>
> Ben Morgan (Ben.Morgan) http://bugs.python.org/issue12004
> Zack Weinber
On Jan 1, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 01/01/2013 05:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
On Jan 1, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> We also discussed about the cont
On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> [...]
>> In order to deal with this, here is my proposal that should placate those of
>> us calling for a ban now and those that feel like there has not been enough
>> of a war
+1
On Aug 23, 2012, at 7:59 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'd like to propose granting Eric Snow commit privileges.
>
> He's been contributing for a couple of years, mostly working on the
> import system replacement with Brett and participating in design
> discussions on import-sig, but also contri
On May 30, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>> Jesse, I had read it and I think it's a good RFP. Kudos to all
>> involved. My point was to address Steve's request for "any one person
>> in the dev community". It seemed to me that th
On May 30, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
>>> Is any one person in the dev community anxious to represent that community
>>> in the (hopefully forthcoming) "new new python.org" development. Pro
That's a question for martin or georg/antoine I think
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 at 2:01 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jesse Noller (mailto:jnol...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > Get CLA's in to Pat Cambell so she can set your bit in the tr
Get CLA's in to Pat Cambell so she can set your bit in the tracker and send in
your public SSH keys, as far as I know :)
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So far Philip Jenvey has been doing the foot work for getting new
> Jython committers a co
I'm +1 on your recommendation alone
On May 15, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> I'm proposing we grant commit privileges to Daniel Urban.
>>
>> He's provided patches for a number of fixes and feature requests for
>> 3.2 and 3.3, in
+1
On May 13, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Hynek Schlawack has now contributed several patches (11 of which appear
>> to have been committed) and has generally been pleasant to work with,
>> being both respon
>
> Guido mentioned him at the 2011 Language Summit as a vanished
> contributor that we'd really like to get an agreement from.
>
> +1
>
> --
> KBK
Interesting note: We supposedly have a contributor agreement on file for him
now:
Contributor Form Received Yes on: 2012-02-26.05:00:00
I'll f
> >
> >
> > Uh, Wow. Yes. He should have commit rights - he was granted them when
> > the multiprocessing pep was approved, but then vanished for several
> > years (myself and others tried getting a hold of him).
>
>
>
> Actually, I don't see his name in the SSH keys history, so apparently he
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be
> seen from (part of) its contributions below:
>
>
[snip]
>
> He writes good code, has good ideas, is reactive to comments and
> reviews,
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 mai 2011 à 09:18 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit :
>> Please make sure he sends in a contributor agreement
>
> I am in contact with Charles-François. I asked me to sign the
> contributor agreement. I told him t
Please make sure he sends in a contributor agreement
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> For the record, and since the devguide commit
> (http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/0e8e3057d7bc) didn't make it to
> python-checkins (because of
> http://hg.python.org/hooks/rev/aebbd6f
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:31 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
>> I would to propose him to commit grant. What do you think?
>
> Including me, we have 4 votes for, none against.
>
> I asked him and he would like to become a Python developer
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:31, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This guy rocks! He understood and fixed many subtle bugs like race
>> conditions recently. Example from the NEWS of Python 3.3:
>>
>> - Issue #12060: Use sig_atomic_t typ
I just think we need to put the ssh key on the server. I know Brett can do it.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> So, nobody seems to disagree and Nadeem's contributor agreement has been
> received some time ago. What is needed for this to go forward?
>
> Regards
>
> Antoin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Steve Holden wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 11:25 -0500, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
> So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that
> he did send the form, that would be good eno
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> I completely agree with you - we have to make this process modern, and
>> simple. We just disagree on if it's necessary or not.
>
> I hate arguments from authority, but here's the 2010 breakdown of
> committers by changesets (thanks Mercur
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> > No, sorry, that doesn't parse.
>> > We don't need an explanation, we need a *solution*. Nobody cares about
>> > explanations when most online projects accept patches and enrole
>> > committers freely.
>>
>> While I agree with you that we
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 à 07:25 -0500, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > Please don't blame the PSF for the inadequate state of digital
>> > signature technologies and their uncertain place i
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Fortunately this *can be discussed at the members' meeting. Since I don't
> always follow python-dev I wasn't aware this was blocking commits - the
> process is pretty straightforward as it is. Guido established the Foundation
> to do what i
We have to have contributor agreements on file for core committers.
On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> What is the process now? Is it a showstopper?
>
>
>
> Message transféré
> De: Pat Campbell
> À: Antoine Pitrou
> Cc: Steve Holden
> Sujet: Re: [pytho
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 17:24 -0500, R. David Murray a écrit :
>> Has any progress been made on an electronically signable agreement
>> and/or adding "posting a patch to this tracker means you have the right
>> to contribute it and you do
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Sep 2010, at 15:43, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I propose we give commit privileges to Łukasz Langa. He has submitted
>> various non-trivial patches of rather good quality (for example new
>> features for ConfigParser
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:13 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 27.08.2010 15:28, schrieb Jesse Noller:
>> Can someone with the power make sure Ask (asksol) has dev-level privs
>> on the tracker?
>
> Benjamin took care of that.
>
Can someone with the power make sure Ask (asksol) has dev-level privs
on the tracker?
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 16.08.2010 19:22, schrieb Jesse Noller:
>> Does anyone have an issue with me requesting commit privs for Ask
>> Solem to help me with the multiprocessing module? He's the author of
>> the celery pac
Does anyone have an issue with me requesting commit privs for Ask
Solem to help me with the multiprocessing module? He's the author of
the celery package (http://celeryproject.org/) and one of the biggest
multiprocessing users I know of. He's also submitted several patches,
and I consult with him o
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> So if everyone agrees Eric gets commit access, and works with me on
>> Distutils, and I stay the official maintainer
>
> +1
>
>
> -Fred
+1 as well
___
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ronald Oussoren
wrote:
>
> On 27 Jul, 2010, at 16:24, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> Le mardi 27 juillet 2010 à 07:15 -0700, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
>>> Well like it or not Tarek is not going to do it. So who will? You, or
>>> a new volunteer?
>>
>> Well, we don't
My apologies everyone. Apparently my three year old knows how to work the mail
app on my iPhone.
On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mail
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 05, 2010, at 02:56 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>>I would like to propose Jean-Paul Calderone (exarkun) for commit access.
>>
>>He is a core-twisted developer and a very experienced Python developer
>>with a passionate belief in good test
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
There have been a couple of commits to the Python 2.6 branch since the
2.6.5rc1 tag. Since these were done by Florent and Victor, I just
wanted to
re-iterate that all substantive changes (i.e. anything other than
svnmerge
blocks) need to b
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:52, Michael Foord wrote:
>>> What is the risk of going ahead with a broken system?
>>>
>>> The crux of the matter is that building Python for Windows could break if
>>> someone accidentally
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> David Malcolm is the Fedora maintainer for the Python package and has
>> written a gdb plugin to replace and dramatically improve our old
>> Misc/gdbinit file using
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
2009/9/18 Jesse Noller :
I would like to propose we give the commit bit to Doug Hellmann in
order for him to help out with documentation and GHOP style tasks
(he's helped in the past).
You might know him from the "Python
The docs are the initial thing, I'll ask him to run anything else by me.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
As long as he sticks to the docs (at least initially unless you are
going to personally approve all code commits) I'm fine with it.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10
I would like to propose we give the commit bit to Doug Hellmann in
order for him to help out with documentation and GHOP style tasks
(he's helped in the past).
You might know him from the "Python Module of the Week" series here:
http://www.doughellmann.com/PyMOTW/
Many of his examples, and doc s
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Trent Nelson
wrote:
... snip
>Snakebite is my gift to you!
>
>
>Trent.
Wow, thank you Trent - this really rocks.
-jesse
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7 Dec, 2008, at 2:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ronald> * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x
>>
>> Brett> That requirement right there take me out for being able to to do
>> Brett> the binary.
>>
>> Jesse> I coul
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
>Martin> Yes, it's broken.
>
>Skip> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
>Martin> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
>Jesse> My 10.5 buildbot should
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
> Yes, it's broken.
>
>> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
My 10.5 buildbot should still be ac
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>
> How
On Aug 15, 2008, at 10:54 AM, "A.M. Kuchling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:48:49PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
And, if you pick up that bug six month later, or three year later,
you
lose twenty minutes reading the whole discussion, and then realize
that neither yo
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
Yup - it went in during alpha, and I underestimated the amount of
work, which won't happen again.
Stunning
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 14, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
By the way the guys are totally awesome, dude. :)
I agree wholeheartedly!
That's what branches are for. I really stron
Although I'm new, I would be +1 - more windows experience with a
willingness to provide patches is something I feel we need.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do people think about making Hirokazu Yamamoto a committer? I rarely
> see any mailing li
60 matches
Mail list logo
