On 21.09.2018 14:59, Paul Moore wrote:
> Balance, forgiveness, and a mature level of empathy are what's
> *really* needed ("among the things that are needed...":-)). Not
> policies. Policies should be weapons of last resort.
Agreed.
I guess we'll also have to learn that flamebait as we had it in
On 09/21/2018 07:51 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 21/09/2018 à 14:45, Paul Moore a écrit :
It's not likely to be a practical option on a mailing list, but in
primary school (which the whole conversation felt like) a likely
response would have been to put *everyone* involved in a time-out for
a
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/09/2018 à 14:45, Paul Moore a écrit :
>>
>> It's not likely to be a practical option on a mailing list, but in
>> primary school (which the whole conversation felt like) a likely
>> response would have been to put *everyone*
Le 21/09/2018 à 14:45, Paul Moore a écrit :
>
> It's not likely to be a practical option on a mailing list, but in
> primary school (which the whole conversation felt like) a likely
> response would have been to put *everyone* involved in a time-out for
> a period of cooling off, to think about
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 13:30, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> So part of being and open and welcoming community, is knowing and
>> understanding that words, images, etc like that can make people feel like
>> we’re either a group that will
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 13:30, Donald Stufft wrote:
> So part of being and open and welcoming community, is knowing and
> understanding that words, images, etc like that can make people feel like
> we’re either a group that will directly engage in those attacks that have
> been associated with
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 13:26, Carol Willing wrote:
> Context is important. I wonder though if the author's intent was constructive
> comment...
I'm sure it wasn't. But in context, it was a statement made in a
thread that had long previously become nothing more than
non-constructive invective.
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 12:38, Carol Willing wrote:
>
>> Much of the discussion here has focused on the use of a few words.
>>
>> IMHO, discussing violence, assault, and implying that its okay to accept and
>> trivialize this violence do
Hi Paul,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Fear of speaking or fear of reading - both are not ideal. The balance of
respectful discourse likely falls somewhere between the two.
Context is important. I wonder though if the author's intent was
constructive comment...
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 8:01
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 12:38, Carol Willing wrote:
> Much of the discussion here has focused on the use of a few words.
>
> IMHO, discussing violence, assault, and implying that its okay to accept and
> trivialize this violence do not belong in posts about the Python language.
>
> From the
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 7:07 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/09/2018 à 12:55, Christian Heimes a écrit :
>> On 21/09/2018 12.46, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 21/09/2018 à 02:06, Nathaniel Smith a écrit :
Now sure, that taboo is an American thing, and I wouldn't support
11 matches
Mail list logo