Re: [jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-59) Add get_session() method torequestobject

Graham Dumpleton wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote .. I think the automatic session unlock needs to stay. It's just too easy for the user to forget a manual unlock, deadlock the session and hose their server in very short order. In your following comments I'm assuming you are talking about the ca

[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-45: - Resolution: Fixed This has been resolved a while ago. We now need some documentation. > Implement a file-based session manager > -

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-8) Improve apache.load_module with a two-level locking scheme

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-8?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-8: --- Fix Version: 3.3.0 (was: 3.2.0) Description: We should rewrite apache.load_python with a two level locking scheme, in order to

Re: 3.2

Hi, I've marked #45 as resolved, since the FileSession class has been checked in for a while now. We only need a bit of documentation, but a few seconds of source browsing can help an adventurous user to see how to use FileSession. Now, what should we do about the new req.get_session() API ? Is it

Re: 3.2

Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolutionIds=-1&pid=10640&fixfor=-1 Maybe some of them should be included in the 3.2 release ? Regards, Nicolas2005/7/28, Nicolas Le

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-54) Add a way to import a published page into another published page

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-54?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-54: Fix Version: 3.3.0 (was: 3.2.0) Description: Before mod_python 3.2, standard Python modules and published modules could be i

Re: 3.2

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolutionIds=-1&pid=10640&fixfor=-1 Maybe some of them should be included in the 3.2 re

Re: 3.2

OK, +1 for me. Regards, Nicolas2005/7/28, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:> Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues :>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priorit

Re: 3.2

As a non-developer, just as an user: +1 Nicolas Lehuen wrote: OK, +1 for me. Regards, Nicolas 2005/7/28, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : >

Re: 3.2

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolutionIds=-1&pid=10640&fixfor=-1 Maybe some o

Re: 3.2

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I've either commited fixes or have fixes ready for 6 or 8 of those issues. Also there some that don't apply to 3.2 (eg website or mailing list issues). Must run right now but will make a list this evening of issues which can be closed. Do you think

Re: 3.2

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I've either commited fixes or have fixes ready for 6 or 8 of those issues. Also there some that don't apply to 3.2 (eg website or mailing list issues). Must run right now but will make a list this evening of issues

Re: 3.2

Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, I've marked #45 as resolved, since the FileSession class has been checked in for a while now. We only need a bit of documentation, but a few seconds of source browsing can help an adventurous user to see how to use FileSession. Now, what should we do about the new r

Re: 3.2

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I don't want to leave req_get_session in as-is since people may start using it which would make things difficult if the final solution ends up being something completely different. Rather than delete req_get_session() completely I'd like to change it

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-59) Add get_session() method to request object

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-59?page=all ] Jim Gallacher updated MODPYTHON-59: --- Version: 3.3.0 (was: 3.2.0) Defering implentation to 3.3. > Add get_session() method to request object > -

Re: 3.2

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I don't want to leave req_get_session in as-is since people may start using it which would make things difficult if the final solution ends up being something completely different. Rather than delete req_get_session

Re: 3.2

Jim Gallacher wrote: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolutionIds=-1&pid=10640&fix

Re: 3.2

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: I just looked on JIRA, and there are 3 issues marked for 3.2. http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolutionIds=-1&pid=10640&fixfor=11060 I don't see any of them as show stop

Re: 3.2

Sorry, getting a bit overwhelmed with all these rapid changes in state of things as bit busy today. Will probably will only know what is going on when I look at latest code in repository. Then I'll probably pipe in with some more pertinent comments about 3.2. One report I would like to get some co

Re: 3.2

Jim Gallacher wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Note that there are 29 unscheduled issues : http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolut